2005v6stang

How much fast is the manual, in 0-60 time and quarter mile times than an auto.

workshop4ever

stock or tuned?

__________________

2005v6stang

stock

powerProdigy

i hear 6.9 seconds, though with a manual the driver makes ALL the difference.

Derf00

oh fuk, here we go.

__________________
quote:

ORIGINAL: P Zero

He could strap a rocket to his ass and beat em on foot too.
-P.

jericho73

6.9 0-60 is what C&D got for the auto, manual is prolly .3 or .4 tenths quicker.

__________________
06 Redfire Mustang
C&L/tune
JBA axleback
GT front & rockers

chavalo_nm1

well what about 1/4 mile times..........stock

__________________
Too many mods to list

blackfoot

doesnt matter where you go0, somone always asks the VS question....

__________________
05 V6 black,std, red int
alpine CD9835
10" rockford P2
directedaudio x2600 amp
xenon rear window scoops
eibach pro-kit
Dual GT take offs

1970 convertible, lots of goodies

Goliath

stock for stock, the manual is better.

Both modded, the manual will make more power (marginally) but the auto will be more consistent and leave less to the driver. The auto tranny is apparently a little more robust and will take a beating better than the weak clutch in the manual.

__________________
SCT tune Evolution Performance, C&L CAI, FRPP (Borla) exhaust, Hurst short throw

rygenstormlocke

Auto if you are braket racing, or stuck in bumper to bumper traffic a lot....

Manual if you want every ounce of HP you can get out of the car....

Or just pick what you like.

__________________

Best 1/4: 10.97@122.09, 1.56 60ft w/4.0 V6
Best 1/4: 11.67@115.45, 1.64 60ft w/5.4 3V
Best 1/8: 7.401@92.77, 1.65 60ft w/5.4 3V
www.rygen.net/stang