Mustang Forums   Mustang Classifieds   Photo Gallery   Calendars   Search   Live Chat   Contact MF   Sponsors
  Mustang Recalls   Mustang TSB's   News   Timeslips   Timeline   Wallpaper   Member List   Register   Login

Stage 3 Roush reviewed in Road and Track

  Printable Version
Mustang Forums >> Ford Mustang Tech >> Saleen, Roush and Boss Mustangs >> Stage 3 Roush reviewed in Road and Track Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Stage 3 Roush reviewed in Road and Track - 7/24/2006 2:32:31 PM   
xzo6


Posts: 211
Joined: 6/13/2006
Status: offline
xzo6's photo gallery
The August issue of Road and Track had some nice things to say about The Roush Mustang.They did a few comparisons with the new Shelby Gt 500 .In the area of handling and acceleration ,in particular .Both vehicles will go zero to 60mph in 4.7 seconds.The quater mile trap speed is slightly better for the Shelby(13.1 at 112.2mph) and the Roush(13.3 at 107.8 mph).
It made note of the weight distribution of both cars,saying the Roush is well balanced compared to the nose heavy ShelbyGT 500..."the aluminum block 4.6 liter V8 is much trimmer than the cast iron Triton 5.4 GT500".In the slalom the Roush's performance ..."is balanced all around...threading past the cones at 68.5mph(compared to 65.3)"..on the skid pad the Roush generated 0.94g versus the Shelby0.87g."

I only mention this article since I thought a few may be interested.Also I felt compelled to pass this on since I own a Stage 3 Roush
Post #: 1
RE: Stage 3 Roush reviewed in Road and Track - 7/24/2006 2:41:38 PM   
S281 E

 

Posts: 2682
Joined: 3/30/2006
Status: offline
If you don't mind me asking how much was the final damage?

(in reply to xzo6)
Post #: 2
RE: Stage 3 Roush reviewed in Road and Track - 7/24/2006 3:12:02 PM   
xzo6


Posts: 211
Joined: 6/13/2006
Status: offline
xzo6's photo gallery
The Roush lists out at $46,945.00.(US).When I was shopping for a replacement for my 2004 Zo6(I paid $65,000.00 for the Vette with 2000 miles on it in 2004...brand new they listed for $81,000.00(CDN)
I picked up a Mustang Gt converted to a Stage 3 Roush by the Dealer.It didn't have all the components but I paid $47,000.oo (CDN).Since then I put about $5,000.00 (CDN)into it and completed the package(suspension,brakes,wheels and tires,BFG drag radials, front bumper cover.)The car came with 18" ford Bullit style wheels and BFG G force tires.The blower was already installed (by the Dealer)along with the fake hood scoop,duckbill rear spoiler and side quarter window covers.To have one of these for what I paid in Canadian dollars seem okay to me.I didn't want the Roush rear bumper cover or the exhaust kit that goes with it.The Dealer had already put in Borla stingers and Eibach springs.I think the OEM stock rear bumper cover is nicer.My only regret is the fake hood scoop(I know it is supposed to add character)...

(in reply to S281 E)
Post #: 3
RE: Stage 3 Roush reviewed in Road and Track - 7/24/2006 3:22:18 PM   
dotbomb

 

Posts: 820
Joined: 7/10/2006
Status: offline
Thanks for sharing that info/article.

The points it brings out are exactly why I chose to purchase a supercharged Saleen over waiting for a GT500. Glad to see the "experts" chime in on these differences with some official comparisons.

_____________________________

1968 GT/CS Sold
2006 S281 SC #469



475 HP kit (more like 465), 3.73 Gears, "E" Panhard & Lower Control Arms

(in reply to xzo6)
Post #: 4
RE: Stage 3 Roush reviewed in Road and Track - 7/24/2006 7:11:17 PM   
Daniel60



Posts: 3818
Joined: 12/24/2004
Status: offline
Daniel60's photo gallery
Do you think you can out run the Shelby GT500?

_____________________________



____________________________
Too Much , Too Quick, Too Fast.

_________________________________________

(in reply to dotbomb)
Post #: 5
RE: Stage 3 Roush reviewed in Road and Track - 7/24/2006 7:20:30 PM   
dotbomb

 

Posts: 820
Joined: 7/10/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Daniel60

Do you think you can out run the Shelby GT500?


No


_____________________________

1968 GT/CS Sold
2006 S281 SC #469



475 HP kit (more like 465), 3.73 Gears, "E" Panhard & Lower Control Arms

(in reply to Daniel60)
Post #: 6
RE: Stage 3 Roush reviewed in Road and Track - 7/24/2006 8:19:31 PM   
Jonsey

 

Posts: 1008
Joined: 2/15/2006
From: Fullerton, CA
Status: offline
Jonsey's photo gallery
Do you think you can out run the Shelby GT500? _____________________________

If by out run you mean a road course battle, I will take a Saleen SC everytime. Better balance, lower weight should put the SC ahead.

If by out run you mean a drag strip it will depend on the driver. Look at the difference between the Motor Trend run and the MM & FF run. The Saleen Sc beats motor Trend but not MM & FF. Put the 475 upgrade on and it would be closer with MM & FF.

I could not agree with Dotbomb more. This is why I bought my Saleen and did not wait for the Shelby.


_____________________________

2006 Saleen SC Silver #458

2002 911-sold to buy Saleen
2003 S2000-sold
1997 SVT Cobra-sold
1988 GT-sold
1986 Cobra (Canadian)-sold


(in reply to dotbomb)
Post #: 7
RE: Stage 3 Roush reviewed in Road and Track - 7/25/2006 10:45:12 AM   
SMOKE


Posts: 343
Joined: 8/21/2003
From: United States
Status: offline
SMOKE's photo gallery
quote:

ORIGINAL: Jonsey

Do you think you can out run the Shelby GT500? _____________________________

If by out run you mean a road course battle, I will take a Saleen SC everytime. Better balance, lower weight should put the SC ahead.



Agreed.

The case by and large for the ROUSH, SALEEN, STEEDA and KB built GT based cars. STOCK for STOCK, they all have been good as or better in handling. In some cases by a large margin.



_____________________________


"Own a Roush? Check it out."

(in reply to Jonsey)
Post #: 8
RE: Stage 3 Roush reviewed in Road and Track - 7/25/2006 11:54:34 AM   
dotbomb

 

Posts: 820
Joined: 7/10/2006
Status: offline
Yup. This was the first time I purchased a car based on test driving one and watching videos of the other one I was considering. It was pretty obvious that I wouldn't care for how the stock GT500 handled. So it is good to hear these observations validated by the reviews that are coming out regarding the GT500.

Don't get me wrong, for $45k the GT500 is a hell of a car. If I end up hitting a jackpot or two I may just have to own both a GT500 and a Saleen

_____________________________

1968 GT/CS Sold
2006 S281 SC #469



475 HP kit (more like 465), 3.73 Gears, "E" Panhard & Lower Control Arms

(in reply to SMOKE)
Post #: 9
RE: Stage 3 Roush reviewed in Road and Track - 7/25/2006 12:12:28 PM   
Bob D.


Posts: 290
Joined: 6/8/2006
Status: offline
Prior to buying my Saleen I had a tweaked '98 Porsche Carerra 2 "S," and have been lucky enough to have other great-handling cars. I was/am shocked with how well the Saleen handles. I love the HP but what sold me was the handling, which is the icing on the cake IMHO, and a huge improvement over the stock GT.

_____________________________

Satin Silver 2005 Saleen S281 SC Convertible
JDM 3.4, ''08 Extreme CAI, 14" brakes, HID headlights


(in reply to dotbomb)
Post #: 10
Login OR Register now to post a reply to this forum topic.
Page:   [1]

 

 
Mustang >> Ford Mustang Tech >> Saleen, Roush and Boss Mustangs
Jump to:
Forum Rules & FAQ
Today's Posts
Most Active Topics
RSS Feeds
Make A Donation

Mustangs:
Classic Mustang
Mustang II
Fox Body Mustang
sn95 Mustang
New Edge Mustang
s197 Mustang
Mustang Clubs
2007 GT500 Mustang
2009 Mustang
Ford Mustang Prices


Featured Sponsors
Advertising Info

Top 10 Posters
pro50sc17921
nanaki14685
88bluegt14536
dan04cobra14527
addermk213993
ride of the 13712
hotrods_n_bo13326
2000gt4.612516
mustangman0211983
1slo8511744

New Vendors
Extreme Dimension
BMR Fabrication
Year One
Auto Badges
Trickflow
Speedware Motorsports
LTM Global
Late Model Restoration
Southern Mustang Parts
BrandMotion

MustangForums.com is not affiliated with or endorsed by Ford Motor Company.