300zx vs gt, winner? (Full Version)

Mustang Forum >> Ford Mustang Tech >> 5.0 Mustang

300zx vs gt, winner?

  

ANTICIVIC -> 300zx vs gt, winner? (3/23/2003 10:45:32 PM)

Who do you guys think would win, an 90 non turbo stock auto 300zx, or a 94 gt auto stock?

  
91GT5.0 -> 300zx vs gt, winner? (3/24/2003 6:28:08 PM)

The stang, no question. I can beat Stock turbo 300ZX with my 91 5 spd GT by 2-3 cars

lloydchristmas -> 300zx vs gt, winner? (3/24/2003 7:31:09 PM)

I can run faster than a 300z with no turbo

noslow50 -> 300zx vs gt, winner? (3/24/2003 8:18:56 PM)

Dumb ???? of course the stang

91GT5.0 -> 300zx vs gt, winner? (3/25/2003 1:08:26 PM)

Quote: Originally posted by 91GT5.0 on 24 March 2003

The stang, no question. I can beat Stock turbo 300ZX with my 91 5 spd GT by 2-3 cars





EDIT: Excuse me, that was when my car was STOCK except for the air silencer delete mod

DrifterX -> 300zx vs gt, winner? (3/28/2003 5:47:47 PM)

Yeah..non turbos are garbage..

cornhusker85 -> 300zx vs gt, winner? (3/31/2003 1:24:13 PM)

300zx i beat plenty of stangs with my old 300zx now im looking at a 95 stang though

86monster -> 300zx vs gt, winner? (3/31/2003 3:15:59 PM)

definetly the gt the non turbo suck but the twin turbos are the ones you have to watch out for.

jeep45238 -> 300zx vs gt, winner? (3/31/2003 6:28:55 PM)

Quote: Originally posted by cornhusker85 on 31 March 2003

300zx i beat plenty of stangs with my old 300zx now im looking at a 95 stang though







You're on crack boy.....

91GT5.0 -> 300zx vs gt, winner? (3/31/2003 8:19:31 PM)

Quote: Originally posted by cornhusker85 on 31 March 2003

300zx i beat plenty of stangs with my old 300zx now im looking at a 95 stang though





Your 300zx HAD to have been turboed, and then it would HAD to have aftermarket turbo's. I killed TT 300zx's in my stock GT. Especially on the freeway where I got more room

noslow50 -> 300zx vs gt, winner? (3/31/2003 9:10:53 PM)

NICE wish my stang could beat my other car...that's how messed upt he stang is....lol oh well...i'll fix it ...

351stang -> 300zx vs gt, winner? (4/3/2003 7:37:01 PM)

LOL! you guys must be racing some crappy 300's. ive had two non-turbo 1990+ 300's, and one twin turbo. the non turbo 2seater i had ran 14.9@93 with nothing but exhaust and air intake, and the 2+2 model i had ran 15.1@94, but both of those were 5 speeds. the twin turbo would eat any stock mustang for breakfast running 13.6@106 bone stock. the only thing holding those cars back is a good driver, and a properly maintenenced engine.



maybe you guys are thinking about the older 80's model 300s??? either way i think a 94gt auto vs. a 90+300zx non turbo would be a pretty close race, but i'll say the gt should win, but not by much.

spike306 -> 300zx vs gt, winner? (4/4/2003 12:33:32 PM)

my buddy had two non turbos, one auto, and one 5-speed. both simi quick, and he was a good driver with a properly maint. eng. however, his auto 90' would have been beaten by a stock 94' gt

91GT5.0 -> 300zx vs gt, winner? (4/4/2003 3:26:10 PM)

Well, all the drivers I went against must have sucked bad because I never had a problem pulling 2-3 cars on 'em

spike306 -> 300zx vs gt, winner? (4/4/2003 4:46:44 PM)

i love to hear that!!

DougBlevins -> 300zx vs gt, winner? (4/7/2003 2:53:40 PM)

i feel sorry for a 5.0 owner that can't run a 14.9 like u say ur 300 zx ran

five-o -> 300zx vs gt, winner? (4/7/2003 7:56:28 PM)

I was in a 91 300zx non turbo with a 5 and it was rather quick, although tha Stang would win. Also, imports aren't that bad, dude, chill!

351stang -> 300zx vs gt, winner? (4/7/2003 11:32:23 PM)

Quote: Originally posted by DougBlevins on 07 April 2003

i feel sorry for a 5.0 owner that can't run a 14.9 like u say ur 300 zx ran





true, but its not gonna be as bad a loss stock vs. stock, as some of you are making it out to be. keep in mind the 94-95 5.0 is the slowest of the pack as far as the 5liter motor is concerened. with a good driver they usually can do high to mid 14's, with a lower trap speed than the z. the listed hp is 215, compared to the z's 222. i'll say it again, it should be a close race, but the stangs torque will win it off the line. the z will probably start pulling slightly on the upper end though, just not enough to make a difference in the 1/4.

DougBlevins -> 300zx vs gt, winner? (4/8/2003 1:30:31 PM)

u got that right, the '94 and '95 breed of mustangs w/ the horizonal tail lights r the mark of the beast. although the new body style from the fox mustang did look good, they were very sick in the performance department. if u do the same stuff to a '93 that u do to a '94 5.0, the '93 will b much quicker.

Killnboy -> 300zx vs gt, winner? (4/8/2003 8:06:40 PM)

LOL all imports suck.... they are nothing without their turbos and TT, and stickers......who can forget about the stickers. And yes since when is TT bone stock?

  

Page: [1] 2 3   next >   >>

Return to Mustang Forums home page or view the Full Version of this page.