RE: N/A big block vs. a blown small block; which is better?
Login | |
|
RE: N/A big block vs. a blown small block; which is bet... - 7/4/2006 1:21:03 AM
|
|
|
pyromania
Posts: 95
Joined: 6/15/2006 From: Braselton, GA Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: C6 VETTE quote:
ORIGINAL: pyromania quote:
ORIGINAL: 2000GT4.6 quote:
ORIGINAL: pyromania quote:
ORIGINAL: C6 VETTE I will admit the last few years has'nt been in GM's favor. In the mid 90's almost every police dept. in the country used Impala's/ Caprice's now look. GM decided to shrink the Impala and turn it into a 6cyl. Now the Ford Crown Vic's dominate the Police/Govt fleets as well as the taxi cab company fleets. Also I used to work for a limo company in the mid 90's and asked what ever happen to the Caddy Fleetwood limo's and sedans. Their response was Cadillac turned their full sized sedans into front wheel drive and the limo industry went the way of the Lincoln. So I do agree that GM needs to find something and stick with it. Even on the side of Ford, everybody has to stick with a car and if they abandon it and then years later try to reintroduce the line it just makes it that much harder for the product to sell (its a gamble). remember the Thunderbird. Although I think the high asking price had alot to do with its demise. I just hope this does'nt happen to the Camaro. But on the bright side unit sales were up last year maybe it had to do with the redesign of the Vette. you are right there. about the t-bird. but the cougar was changed to a FWD coupe and i don't see them anywhere either. i think the new vette might promote more vette sales but GM has to get a real sports coupe, they go from the cavabalt to the solstice/sky straight to the 60k+ vette. they need something in the middle, something that starts out at around 20k and is able to go to 40k. they need to use the stang as an example, base v6 20-25k, v8 option 22-27k, kickass model 26-33k, and maybe a specialty. i honestly don't see it happening. +1 regardless of who you are. Except the not seeing it happening thing. They tried with the GTO, only no base models. I think they will do the base/mid/high level models with the new camaro if it ever comes out, just to keep up with ford if nothing else. GM had it with the GTO/Monaro. they had something going. don't know what, but no base v6 killed that car I think this car was doomed from the start. Everybody's squakking more about the looks more than the price. Mid $30's is'nt bad for the roomy interior , a fairly spacious back seat and a powerful engine with impressive performance numbers. If this car was a looker it might have sold. And instead of saving money by having a six cyl option, they give you a GS 6. (A completely different car) You want to see a car thats worthless to a dead market it's the GS6 is that the one that is replacing the grand am line. it dead. it can't happen. i think that the ford fusion might be dead in few years as well.
_____________________________
1993 GT with 351W and Kenne Bell blower. R.I.P. 2003 V6 5-Speed With 4.3 SSM Forged Stroker, MAC Shorties, Pypes Offroad X-Pipe And SLP Loudmouth Cat-Back. I Want Boost.
|
|
|
|
|
|
RE: N/A big block vs. a blown small block; which is bet... - 7/4/2006 1:35:26 AM
|
|
|
C6 VETTE
 Posts: 2869
Joined: 5/17/2006 Status: offline
|
It is VERY important for the Camaro to survive it's reincarnation. If it does'nt , I don't see GM to ever be a major player in the mid price muscle car arena. I can't remember any model line that had it's plug pulled then be reintroduced to have any margin of success compared to its previous history before its demise (GM has a tough task on their hands). All we can do is wait. I will say this much, the F-bodys are still common place which has kept the rivalry active, but could you imagine how dead this forum would be without the GM rivalry. It's is extremely crucial for GM, but in a lesser extent its also crucial for FORD.
< Message edited by C6 VETTE -- 7/4/2006 1:42:30 AM >
_____________________________
2006 Corvette coupe/Corsa sport exhaust w/ mid-pipe 1999 Mustang GT/stock
|
|
|
|
RE: N/A big block vs. a blown small block; which is bet... - 7/4/2006 1:43:36 AM
|
|
|
pyromania
Posts: 95
Joined: 6/15/2006 From: Braselton, GA Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: C6 VETTE It is VERY important for the Camaro to survive it's reincarnation. If it does'nt , I don't see GM to ever be a major player in the mid price muscle car arena. I can't remember any model line that had it's plug pulled then be reintroduced to have any margin of success compared to its previous history before its demise (GM has a tough task on their hands). All we can do is wait. I will say this much, the F-bodys are still common place but could you imagine how dead this forum would be without the GM rivalry. It's is extremely crucial for GM, but in a lesser extent its also crucial for FORD. that's true. it will cause ford to lower it's prices on the stang. it might also force mopar to introduce their own pony car. it could make, or break, the Big 3.
_____________________________
1993 GT with 351W and Kenne Bell blower. R.I.P. 2003 V6 5-Speed With 4.3 SSM Forged Stroker, MAC Shorties, Pypes Offroad X-Pipe And SLP Loudmouth Cat-Back. I Want Boost.
|
|
|
|
|
|
RE: N/A big block vs. a blown small block; which is bet... - 7/4/2006 8:07:29 PM
|
|
|
Clif Brohn
Team MF Member #885 Posts: 2626
Joined: 12/4/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: pyromania quote:
ORIGINAL: C6 VETTE It is VERY important for the Camaro to survive it's reincarnation. If it does'nt , I don't see GM to ever be a major player in the mid price muscle car arena. I can't remember any model line that had it's plug pulled then be reintroduced to have any margin of success compared to its previous history before its demise (GM has a tough task on their hands). All we can do is wait. I will say this much, the F-bodys are still common place but could you imagine how dead this forum would be without the GM rivalry. It's is extremely crucial for GM, but in a lesser extent its also crucial for FORD. that's true. it will cause ford to lower it's prices on the stang. it might also force mopar to introduce their own pony car. it could make, or break, the Big 3. Huh? If it does anything, it will cause Ford to kick it into high gear. More Mustang models, maybe even new cars. We could see the return of the Gran Torino, or hopefully see the return of SVT as a means to compete with GM. On a Side note, what are the "Big 3" right now? I dont think it's still Ford, GM, and Daimler/Chrysler. Not sure though.
_____________________________
quote:
Warning: Clif is extremely snide, sarcastic, and a little crazy
|
|
|
|
RE: N/A big block vs. a blown small block; which is bet... - 7/4/2006 8:08:58 PM
|
|
|
hammeron
Posts: 7823
Joined: 5/17/2006 Status: offline
|
great question, cant' wait for the answer
|
|
|
|
RE: N/A big block vs. a blown small block; which is bet... - 7/4/2006 11:11:50 PM
|
|
|
angcobra
Posts: 1694
Joined: 11/16/2004 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Clif Brohn quote:
ORIGINAL: pyromania quote:
ORIGINAL: C6 VETTE It is VERY important for the Camaro to survive it's reincarnation. If it does'nt , I don't see GM to ever be a major player in the mid price muscle car arena. I can't remember any model line that had it's plug pulled then be reintroduced to have any margin of success compared to its previous history before its demise (GM has a tough task on their hands). All we can do is wait. I will say this much, the F-bodys are still common place but could you imagine how dead this forum would be without the GM rivalry. It's is extremely crucial for GM, but in a lesser extent its also crucial for FORD. that's true. it will cause ford to lower it's prices on the stang. it might also force mopar to introduce their own pony car. it could make, or break, the Big 3. Huh? If it does anything, it will cause Ford to kick it into high gear. More Mustang models, maybe even new cars. We could see the return of the Gran Torino, or hopefully see the return of SVT as a means to compete with GM. On a Side note, what are the "Big 3" right now? I dont think it's still Ford, GM, and Daimler/Chrysler. Not sure though. Still listed as big 3 on todays news when they discussed sagging sales for June GM down 26% Ford down 6% Chrysler down 13% may not be the exact numbers but it was something like that
|
|
|
|
RE: N/A big block vs. a blown small block; which is bet... - 7/5/2006 5:42:12 AM
|
|
|
Pewterwssicc
Posts: 310
Joined: 3/15/2006 Status: offline
|
I read almost all of this post and there are only three things i have to say. I dont wanna be rude and the mods probably wont like this, but here it goes. Birdieman i almost thought you might have some good info until you made this post. I do see the point you where trying to make, but you went about it the wrong way and a lot of what you said was jsut plain incorrect. I dont know how the hell you could say a cast iron 4V is lighter than a pushrod aluminum engine. You said all things being equal, well they arent all equal. You cant just use a magical new engine for your comparison "a 4V with an aluminum block, titanium cams, and carbone fiber valves." If your comparing you have to compare whats there. Anyway a 4V aluminum engine with a S/C i am sure weighs more than our 5.7L aluminum pushrod engine. Think about it, you have 3 more cams, 16 more springs, and so on and so forth. That 4V is also noticeably bigger in proportional size, which in my opinion is why the front of musangs are shaped as aerodynamically as the pushrod cars are, IMO. Could be wrong on the aerodynamics, but it definately looks like it. 20004.6 i never really thought you knew what you where talking about and after this one i believe even less. Build quality on the F-bodies and Mustang are not that far apart. I have seen lots of both cars break trannies, rear-ends, and so forth. My friend had to go to Arbitration to get his 02 GT lemon lawed because it had endless tranny and electrical problems, after he bought an 02 WS6 and again broke the tranny a couple times and eventually blew the motor. But he did those with 430rwhp and it wasnt broken in properly on the drive here we think. The Vette is working off of a long long period of progressive development and uses many parts or similar parts that it has used for years now. So i dont see how it could not be profitable, by your own explanation of a car needing some years for the production to get streamlined and parts cheaper, how much cheaper do you want parts than basically a 10 year old engine. Lastly Pzero, i just dont have the words for this one. Ill start with the comment that F-bodies handle like crap. Its funny that they outhandle every mustang Ford has made except the 03/04 Cobras. F-bodies can pull a .88-.89 lateral G, in comparison to the Mustang GTs .84. You shouldnt ask old mechanics about todays performance, really you shouldnt ask any mechanics, ask a speed shop. Those ASE mechanics work on Hondas and Toyotas and such most of the time. And if there old, they probably stillt hink Carburated is better than EFI. 30rwhp from exhaust is easily attainable, a set of long-tubes, off-road Y-pipe, and a cutout or cat-back will easily get you another 30rwhp. For my final thoguht on this thread I would like to point out that i am not a Mustang hater and i dont think LS cars are gods gift to racing. There are plenty of cars on both sides that are stupid fast and can wreck shop on each other. I do think the LS cars are a better platform for racing and modding, except for the mighty 03/04 Cobras. Those are without a doubt some bad ass cars. The 03/04 Cobras are to Ford guys, what the ZO6 is to chevy guys. It is an awesome performer and excellent capabilities. Thought of buying one myself when they first came out. Anyhow those are my thought, like them or not. And ofcourse ill leave you guys with two sayings. Run what you brung There really is no replacement for displacement
< Message edited by Pewterwssicc -- 7/5/2006 5:48:12 AM >
_____________________________
2008 Panther Black Pontiac G8 GT 2001 Pewter T/A WS6 6-Speed (SOLD)
|
|
|
|
RE: N/A big block vs. a blown small block; which is bet... - 7/5/2006 4:28:43 PM
|
|
|
ThisBlood147
Posts: 3402
Joined: 1/19/2006 From: Louisiana Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Pewterwssicc I read almost all of this post and there are only three things i have to say. I dont wanna be rude and the mods probably wont like this, but here it goes. Birdieman i almost thought you might have some good info until you made this post. I do see the point you where trying to make, but you went about it the wrong way and a lot of what you said was jsut plain incorrect. I dont know how the hell you could say a cast iron 4V is lighter than a pushrod aluminum engine. You said all things being equal, well they arent all equal. You cant just use a magical new engine for your comparison "a 4V with an aluminum block, titanium cams, and carbone fiber valves." If your comparing you have to compare whats there. Anyway a 4V aluminum engine with a S/C i am sure weighs more than our 5.7L aluminum pushrod engine. Think about it, you have 3 more cams, 16 more springs, and so on and so forth. That 4V is also noticeably bigger in proportional size, which in my opinion is why the front of musangs are shaped as aerodynamically as the pushrod cars are, IMO. Could be wrong on the aerodynamics, but it definately looks like it. 20004.6 i never really thought you knew what you where talking about and after this one i believe even less. Build quality on the F-bodies and Mustang are not that far apart. I have seen lots of both cars break trannies, rear-ends, and so forth. My friend had to go to Arbitration to get his 02 GT lemon lawed because it had endless tranny and electrical problems, after he bought an 02 WS6 and again broke the tranny a couple times and eventually blew the motor. But he did those with 430rwhp and it wasnt broken in properly on the drive here we think. The Vette is working off of a long long period of progressive development and uses many parts or similar parts that it has used for years now. So i dont see how it could not be profitable, by your own explanation of a car needing some years for the production to get streamlined and parts cheaper, how much cheaper do you want parts than basically a 10 year old engine. Lastly Pzero, i just dont have the words for this one. Ill start with the comment that F-bodies handle like crap. Its funny that they outhandle every mustang Ford has made except the 03/04 Cobras. F-bodies can pull a .88-.89 lateral G, in comparison to the Mustang GTs .84. You shouldnt ask old mechanics about todays performance, really you shouldnt ask any mechanics, ask a speed shop. Those ASE mechanics work on Hondas and Toyotas and such most of the time. And if there old, they probably stillt hink Carburated is better than EFI. 30rwhp from exhaust is easily attainable, a set of long-tubes, off-road Y-pipe, and a cutout or cat-back will easily get you another 30rwhp. For my final thoguht on this thread I would like to point out that i am not a Mustang hater and i dont think LS cars are gods gift to racing. There are plenty of cars on both sides that are stupid fast and can wreck shop on each other. I do think the LS cars are a better platform for racing and modding, except for the mighty 03/04 Cobras. Those are without a doubt some bad ass cars. The 03/04 Cobras are to Ford guys, what the ZO6 is to chevy guys. It is an awesome performer and excellent capabilities. Thought of buying one myself when they first came out. Anyhow those are my thought, like them or not. And ofcourse ill leave you guys with two sayings. Run what you brung There really is no replacement for displacement +1 Yea, this thread shoulda died a horrid death about 9 pages ago. But there's nothin like a good ole fashioned fanboy war to send a thread's post count soaring into the stratosphere.
_____________________________
98 Mustang V6: stock 93 Mustang vert: H/C/I 302 (SOLD) 05 GT: twin screw s/c + full suspension & tires
|
|
|
|
RE: N/A big block vs. a blown small block; which is bet... - 7/6/2006 3:21:13 AM
|
|
|
pyromania
Posts: 95
Joined: 6/15/2006 From: Braselton, GA Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: 03YellowPony quote:
ORIGINAL: pyromania quote:
ORIGINAL: C6 VETTE When Porsch releases a 911 Carrera w/ 4 seats and a 4cyl to make it affordable to the masses then we can talk about Corvette makeovers................. actually porsch made an entry level car. it was the 914. i don't know specs, and i don't really give a SH!T about 'em. what everyone is saying is GM needs to drop a few of the crappy selling cars from their lineup, and bring back an affordable sports car with an entry and performance level engine. and they need to do something called quality control. they actually had a thing going with the GTO, just no v6. if they had done that and called it the Le Mans like back in the day, it would be selling like crazy, instead of on a respirator. the f-bodies were fast, but there is a very good reason they are taking a dirt-nap, they didn't sell. you could get a Mustang GT well-equipped for the price of a similarly equipped v6 f-body. and it is a more reliable car. You are so full of it BUGGER OFF!! here you go. the "mighty" porsche 914 http://vista.pca.org/stl/914.htm
_____________________________
1993 GT with 351W and Kenne Bell blower. R.I.P. 2003 V6 5-Speed With 4.3 SSM Forged Stroker, MAC Shorties, Pypes Offroad X-Pipe And SLP Loudmouth Cat-Back. I Want Boost.
|
|
|
|
RE: N/A big block vs. a blown small block; which is bet... - 7/6/2006 3:48:32 AM
|
|
|
03YellowPony
Posts: 7434
Joined: 5/31/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: pyromania quote:
ORIGINAL: 03YellowPony quote:
ORIGINAL: pyromania quote:
ORIGINAL: C6 VETTE When Porsch releases a 911 Carrera w/ 4 seats and a 4cyl to make it affordable to the masses then we can talk about Corvette makeovers................. actually porsch made an entry level car. it was the 914. i don't know specs, and i don't really give a SH!T about 'em. what everyone is saying is GM needs to drop a few of the crappy selling cars from their lineup, and bring back an affordable sports car with an entry and performance level engine. and they need to do something called quality control. they actually had a thing going with the GTO, just no v6. if they had done that and called it the Le Mans like back in the day, it would be selling like crazy, instead of on a respirator. the f-bodies were fast, but there is a very good reason they are taking a dirt-nap, they didn't sell. you could get a Mustang GT well-equipped for the price of a similarly equipped v6 f-body. and it is a more reliable car. You are so full of it BUGGER OFF!! here you go. the "mighty" porsche 914 http://vista.pca.org/stl/914.htm EVERYONE notice the tag under his username...BELIEVE IT!
_____________________________
Sound clip http://h1.ripway.com/03YellowPony/S4300181.WAV Sally's gone.. the REAL RedAss MFFDTC #7 MFI#6
|
|
|
|
RE: N/A big block vs. a blown small block; which is bet... - 7/6/2006 1:20:24 PM
|
|
|
eindow
Posts: 1079
Joined: 3/17/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: 2000GT4.6 I can tell you one thing for 100 percent sure, after being in the automotive buisness for awhile, and seeing how things work in the buisness and how they make money. Every vette that rolls off the line costs GM money. Hell, every car they make, including econobox 4cyl, are costing them money. On the changes thing, it is not the general concept that changes, but the tooling required to make the car. Look at the camry, how long did that mid 90s bodystyle last? Forever. And they made a entire company off the car. This is simply because the longer you make the exact same product, the more inovation you can come up with to make it cheaper and faster, and the more streamlined the production process is, so you make more money. It's not a matter of what the vette costs the consumer. Its the fact that it is such a low volume car. This is why the other cars in the performance range of the vette cost so much more. Because they are low volume cars, and the suppliers that make them refuse to (because they can't afford it) loose money on the cars. GM however is so large that for the time being they can afford to loose money. You need to make ALOT of cars of the same exact type to make money. This is why the escape/tribute line was making money, but the mariner line was not. They sold the CRAP out of escape/tribute (200+ thousand a year minmum on the escape alone). We make soo many of them, and got so good at it, it cost us virtually nothing to produce. Then, Ford steps in with the mariner line, with an extremely complicated applique (fake wood) plastic panel, and all the money goes out the door. I am not saying that if the vette was making money GM would be making money. Nor am I saying that the vette is the reason GM is in trouble, far from it. All I am saying is that it would make good buisness since, and it would guarentee that the vette will always be around (well so long as we are still allowed to even produce performance cars). You might say that the vette is invicincible, but I bet more than a few people would have said the same thing about the camaro/firebird just a few years ago. BTW, there can be absoluty no arguement that the imports are doing a better job of producing, marketing, and selling cars than the domestic car companys. This is not a opinion, its just simple fact. Edit: BTW, how can you say nobody would buy a 25K~ V6 vette? They would sell so fast it would make your head spin. Just like the V6 mustang. Do you have any idea how fast the Mustang would be gone if they could not sell the V6 anymore? I have no idea what you guys are discussing(to many ****ing pages to read) but hey 2000GT, DAAAAAAAAAAAAmMMMnnNNNnn Bro everytime I see one of your post it looks like a chapter out of a book... ......C6 your not that far behind either I've seen acouple of your chapters/long post ....
_____________________________
04 Cobra Conv. 8.1@85mph (Bone Stock) 03 Cobra Coupe 7.5@93mph (2.9 Pulley,K&N,Exhaust) 05 STI 8.5@80mph (Bone Stock) & Others Still the KING of S/S
|
|
|
|
|
|
RE: N/A big block vs. a blown small block; which is bet... - 7/7/2006 8:53:49 PM
|
|
|
98LS1
Posts: 7043
Joined: 10/30/2003 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: janine Well, tell me this, since engines are basically air pumps, if a stock 281 2V makes 230 rwhp, and the same engine putting out 10 - 12 psi makes 430 rwhp, how many more cubic inches would it take for that engine to make 430 rwhp normally asperated? If a 281 ci engine makes 230 HP, that means it makes one HP per 1.22 cubic inch. Given that formular, to make another 200 hp, you would have to multiply 1.22 x 430 (target HP) = 524ci. How many pounds is a 524 ci engine and how many pounds is a 281 ci engine with an additional 80 or so pounds? I think the blown small block beats out the big block head and shoulders. Any arguments? Janine Wow....this is truly amazing. Let's make this simple. Turn on your TV. Search for drag racing. Check out the top fuel stuff. Find out what motors they run. Period. I mean hell Janine, even your fully built 281 ci motor with a supercharger, makes 70rwhp less than my stock headed/cam only/125hp DRY shot 346 ci motor. Granted, engineering plays a HUGE role in our two cars, but generally, the larger motor is gonna make more power with equal mods. Typically, A LOT more power.
_____________________________
1998 TransAm Idle/Walkaround
|
|
|
|
RE: N/A big block vs. a blown small block; which is bet... - 7/7/2006 9:12:26 PM
|
|
|
wannabeVobra
Posts: 211
Joined: 7/27/2004 Status: offline
|
ummm 98ls1, please do not argue with janine. she is always right.... or when she has her back against the wall she posts pictures of herself. i really do not want this to happen, ahhhhh
_____________________________
too poor to have a sig
|
|
|
|
RE: N/A big block vs. a blown small block; which is bet... - 7/7/2006 10:38:12 PM
|
|
|
janine
Posts: 850
Joined: 11/25/2004 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: 98LS1 quote:
ORIGINAL: janine Well, tell me this, since engines are basically air pumps, if a stock 281 2V makes 230 rwhp, and the same engine putting out 10 - 12 psi makes 430 rwhp, how many more cubic inches would it take for that engine to make 430 rwhp normally asperated? If a 281 ci engine makes 230 HP, that means it makes one HP per 1.22 cubic inch. Given that formular, to make another 200 hp, you would have to multiply 1.22 x 430 (target HP) = 524ci. How many pounds is a 524 ci engine and how many pounds is a 281 ci engine with an additional 80 or so pounds? I think the blown small block beats out the big block head and shoulders. Any arguments? Janine Wow....this is truly amazing. Let's make this simple. Turn on your TV. Search for drag racing. Check out the top fuel stuff. Find out what motors they run. Period. I mean hell Janine, even your fully built 281 ci motor with a supercharger, makes 70rwhp less than my stock headed/cam only/125hp DRY shot 346 ci motor. Granted, engineering plays a HUGE role in our two cars, but generally, the larger motor is gonna make more power with equal mods. Typically, A LOT more power. Top fuel cars typically run 426 Hemi's bored out to the max. They make thousands of HP. But I thought the issue here was a supercharged SB vs the old High Performance stock Big Blocks -- great engines as the Ford 427, 428, 429 Cobra Jet and 429 Boss. Also the Chevy 396, 427, 454 and even the Dodge 426 and 440 Six Pack. Any one of these engines in their true stock form would get beat by a blown 4.6 2V in a straight up contest in the same car. Of course if you take any one of those big block engines mentioned and put a blower on it, it will make incredible power and absolutely destroy any 281 2V engine. I know this for a fact. I got beat by a 1971 Hemi Cuda by at at least 30 cars -- and I ran 11:31 QM.
_____________________________
02GT DSS BuiltLB VT StageIII HeadsCams AfterCooledVortech15PSI Dual Focus255LpmPumps CobraTank w/1"Line P51 INTAKE MMScoiloversFRONT&REAR SPEC2Clutch 14"Brembo's ROH Wheels18" MMS Subs StdaSwayBars AlburnPosi w/3:73 539WHP@640
|
|
|
|
RE: N/A big block vs. a blown small block; which is bet... - 7/8/2006 2:40:19 AM
|
|
|
Pewterwssicc
Posts: 310
Joined: 3/15/2006 Status: offline
|
Actually Janine the argument wasnt against older big blocks. What i think Birdie meant when he said big block was our small block LS1. He just doesnt know enough about cars to know that its a small block in the F-bodies, Vettes, and GTO's. We discussed this in length and the plain and simple fact is that more Cubes ultimately have a greater capability than less cubes, its a fact, not contestable. The other major point was on which is lighter and again the small block LS1, LS2, LS6, and LS7 are all lighter than the 4V 4.6.
_____________________________
2008 Panther Black Pontiac G8 GT 2001 Pewter T/A WS6 6-Speed (SOLD)
|
|
|
|
|