Should Ford include the engine cover?

local://upfiles/7336/Nl303402692.jpg

local://upfiles/7336/Rm388327491.jpg


POLL (http://forums.bradbarnett.net/index.php?showtopic=2508)

looks bad ass

If without the cover will look like that, then Yea.

But if they kept it like the powdercoat color greyish or chrome-like
then without

I think it looks bad @$$. A good change.

reminds me too much of a chevy tho

I definitely like the way it looks with the cover on.

I like the cover too >> Think it looks cool :)

Thanks for your replies. After posting this poll on several boards, it seams that over 80% want the cover, just hope that Ford is listening[sm=smiley2.gif]

I think ford needs to include a real engine with some hp's

What are we talkin'... 400hp+, 500hp+

well 500 would be unreasonable but that 400 would help without a power adders

Well you figure $s per HP, Mustang GT is @ $92, GTO @ $95 C6 @ $119, Viper @ $170 & Ford GT @ $282 at best... -The current Cobra the only one that beats the equation...

need a low frills hotrod mustang

no power windows,locks,defogger,light wt seats,alum rad,driveshift, 8.8 rear with 3.73's under drive pulleys, f'berglass hood,no sound deading material subercharger on a 5.4 engine ..no roots charger.for around 20-21k

I like the cover, I think it looks good, definitely better than without.

I don't like the covers. Thats just one more thing that has to be removed before you can work on the engine.

I saw one with out the cover last week, it would be nice if they add it but not at extra cost.

Overall, I think the engine bay in the new Mustang looks sloppy and unorganized. You can tell the bean-counters were involved under the hood. They could stand to take some lessons from the Japanese.

Yeah but good luck working on just about any foreign car... [:@]

With the cover. Looks bare without it and I'm sure if you are worried about taking it off to work on the motor that it is not going to be a complicated task.