Mustang Forums   Mustang Classifieds   Photo Gallery   Calendars   Search   Live Chat   Contact MF   Sponsors
  Mustang Recalls   Mustang TSB's   News   Timeslips   Timeline   Wallpaper   Member List   Register   Login

What years

  Printable Version
Mustang >> Ford Mustang Tech >> 5.0 Mustang >> What years Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
What years - 6/11/2006 1:34:41 PM   
!bigman!

 

Posts: 3
Joined: 6/6/2006
Status: offline
What years of the stangs had the 5.0's in them?
Post #: 1
RE: What years - 6/11/2006 1:38:59 PM   
302RideOrDie


Posts: 363
Joined: 5/31/2006
Status: offline
302RideOrDie's photo gallery

quote:

ORIGINAL: !bigman!

What years of the stangs had the 5.0's in them?


The first 5.0 was released in 1968, I think the first year was in 1975 for stangs..

_____________________________


94 Mustang GT 5 Spd
Bomz CAI
Roush UDP
King Cobra Clutch
Flowmaster 40's
Cat's Cut-Out
A/C and Smog pump removed
Bumped Timing 14*
3.73's

(in reply to !bigman!)
Post #: 2
RE: What years - 6/11/2006 2:27:56 PM   
OnyxCobra


Posts: 6965
Joined: 11/27/2005
From: Chicago - in Rochester, NY
Status: online
OnyxCobra's photo gallery
what about the 1969 Boss 302? I think they used the 5.0 in a Mustang in '68 also...

_____________________________

CarDomain - My Website

(in reply to 302RideOrDie)
Post #: 3
RE: What years - 6/11/2006 2:50:09 PM   
r.barn


Posts: 5259
Joined: 2/5/2006
Status: offline
r.barn's photo gallery
think what he is asking is on late model stangs.

5.0 started in 86-93

new body style in 94-95 still had same 5.0 engine too.

_____________________________


"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a
little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
"

Ben Franklin
Plaque in Statue of Liberty

(in reply to OnyxCobra)
Post #: 4
RE: What years - 6/11/2006 4:01:19 PM   
StrongStang50

 

Posts: 1639
Joined: 11/13/2005
Status: offline
all the way up too the 95's

_____________________________


(in reply to r.barn)
Post #: 5
RE: What years - 6/11/2006 4:13:51 PM   
HACKGT350



Posts: 5862
Joined: 1/28/2006
Status: offline
the fox bodies started the 5.0 in 79 with the first but it was a 2bbl dog

_____________________________

quote:

ORIGINAL: FiveLiterRiceEater
i saw this whore do a sweet trick with about 7 ping pong balls...


(in reply to StrongStang50)
Post #: 6
RE: What years - 6/11/2006 7:25:25 PM   
tinman

 

Posts: 2450
Joined: 8/3/2004
Status: offline
Be careful, the 302CID engine showed up in Fords in '68..
Be aware that some Fox Mustangs built from'80 -mid '83 used a 255CID (4.2) V-8 that will look the same on the outside.....
They are DOGS........
5.0 went away after '95......
But was used in same SUV type things as late as '99........

_____________________________

GOOD,FAST, CHEAP-----------YOU CAN ONLY GET 2 OUT OF 3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

(in reply to HACKGT350)
Post #: 7
RE: What years - 6/11/2006 8:11:55 PM   
tokinGLX



Posts: 869
Joined: 1/7/2006
From: denver
Status: online
tokinGLX's photo gallery
quote:

ORIGINAL: tinman

Be careful, the 302CID engine showed up in Fords in '68..
Be aware that some Fox Mustangs built from'80 -mid '83 used a 255CID (4.2) V-8 that will look the same on the outside.....
They are DOGS........
5.0 went away after '95......
But was used in same SUV type things as late as '99........


the 302 was optional in every mustang since 68 except in 74, which did not have a v8. 80 and 81 had the 255ci engines

cmon people, in this age of google, there is no reason to be posting false information

_____________________________


it's psychosomatic. you need a lobotomy. ill get a saw.
-calvin

(in reply to tinman)
Post #: 8
RE: What years - 6/11/2006 8:28:51 PM   
tinman

 

Posts: 2450
Joined: 8/3/2004
Status: offline
I used the book by Al Kirschenbaum for a referance. Maybe you should get one. It's expensive but really good.
Get it from Amazon, maybe cheaperthan Borders.
I think it even has a Ford part number..
BTW, LOC is ISBN-0-8376-0210-6
BTW, Ford racing part number is M1832-Z4
I do think they know what they are talking about.........

_____________________________

GOOD,FAST, CHEAP-----------YOU CAN ONLY GET 2 OUT OF 3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

(in reply to tokinGLX)
Post #: 9
RE: What years - 6/11/2006 8:35:54 PM   
Valcore

 

Posts: 760
Joined: 4/15/2005
Status: offline
I believe you could get them from 79-81 but they became standard in the mustang GT in 1982

the 1982 5.0 had 157hp and 240ft lbs tq

the fox chassis ended in 1993 but the 5.0 was still used up untill 1995 in mustangs.

I think there were some classic mustangs also that offered the 5.0 (302)

_____________________________


-perfection-

(in reply to tinman)
Post #: 10
RE: What years - 6/11/2006 8:36:17 PM   
tokinGLX



Posts: 869
Joined: 1/7/2006
From: denver
Status: online
tokinGLX's photo gallery
right on. but if it says that the 82 and 83 v8 mustangs came with anything less than a 302, then your book is just plain wrong.

< Message edited by tokinGLX -- 6/11/2006 8:44:32 PM >


_____________________________


it's psychosomatic. you need a lobotomy. ill get a saw.
-calvin

(in reply to tinman)
Post #: 11
RE: What years - 6/11/2006 8:39:27 PM   
boss429


Posts: 792
Joined: 5/21/2006
Status: offline
just checked in the stang book, i thought they didnt come in stangs until 69.

but they were indeed availible in 68. i dont think they were very popular in the 68's.

because i've never seen a 68 with a 302?

_____________________________


'88 Notch
Hooker Super Competition Headers
Flows
K&N


www.**** Canuck Version

(in reply to tinman)
Post #: 12
RE: What years - 6/11/2006 8:53:44 PM   
Scout2232

 

Posts: 1193
Joined: 5/4/2006
Status: offline
Scout2232's photo gallery
Also be aware that there are roller and non-roller 302's.

_____________________________


290rwhp and 315rwtq on mustang dyno. 306, 10:1 pistsons w/TFS Heads, TFS Stage 1, GT-40 intake, 1.7rr, 70mm Tbody. 17mpg city 21.5mpg fwy.

(in reply to boss429)
Post #: 13
RE: What years - 6/11/2006 9:00:31 PM   
Valcore

 

Posts: 760
Joined: 4/15/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tokinGLX

right on. but if it says that the 82 and 83 v8 mustangs came with anything less than a 302, then your book is just plain wrong.


"Another interesting and even lesser known fact is that, in Canada, the '82 GT was apparently available with any engine offered in the Mustang line-up (the 4 cylinder 2.3L was standard, with the following engines offered as optional equipment: 2.3L turbo 4 cylinder offered ONLY in Canada in 1982 Mustangs, 3.3L 6 cylinder, 4.2L V8 or 5.0L HO V8)."

thats a direct quote from mustanggt.org

_____________________________


-perfection-

(in reply to tokinGLX)
Post #: 14
RE: What years - 6/11/2006 9:34:37 PM   
tokinGLX



Posts: 869
Joined: 1/7/2006
From: denver
Status: online
tokinGLX's photo gallery
ya, i cant be held accountable for canadian going ons. the book i have says nothing about them.

_____________________________


it's psychosomatic. you need a lobotomy. ill get a saw.
-calvin

(in reply to Valcore)
Post #: 15
RE: What years - 6/11/2006 10:48:18 PM   
tinman

 

Posts: 2450
Joined: 8/3/2004
Status: offline
I still have the idea that some written by a well known auto motive writer and carrying a Ford part number maybe a fairly accurate source over what some peeps post on-line.....

_____________________________

GOOD,FAST, CHEAP-----------YOU CAN ONLY GET 2 OUT OF 3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

(in reply to tokinGLX)
Post #: 16
RE: What years - 6/12/2006 3:15:12 PM   
!bigman!

 

Posts: 3
Joined: 6/6/2006
Status: offline
Why did they stop putting them in the stangs?
quote:

ORIGINAL: tinman
But was used in same SUV type things as late as '99........

They did use them as late as 2001, I have a 2001 Explorer with the 302 in it. Im not sure but i thik that 2001 was the last model year with 302's in them for the explorer.

(in reply to tinman)
Post #: 17
RE: What years - 6/12/2006 7:00:20 PM   
tinman

 

Posts: 2450
Joined: 8/3/2004
Status: offline
The mod motor was going to be the replacement for the conventional SBF. Remember, it first showed up in 1962 as 221CID
I think one of the real reasons was due to emissions standards in passenger cars and they could make something like the mod (4.6) run cleaner than a 5.0.
Remember also that trucks and SUV's have differant standards and so it could go for a few more years there.......
BTW, all the american car builders have done redesign on all the V-8's in the past 10-15 years, The SBC don't even resemble a Chevy anymore and Mopar has done the deal twice. First with the 'Magnam' type engine and now with the 'Hemi' thats not a true hemi at all...

_____________________________

GOOD,FAST, CHEAP-----------YOU CAN ONLY GET 2 OUT OF 3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

(in reply to !bigman!)
Post #: 18
Login OR Register now to post a reply to this forum topic.
Page:   [1]

 

 
Mustang Forums >> Ford Mustang Tech >> 5.0 Mustang
Jump to:
Forum Rules & FAQ
Today's Posts
Most Active Topics
RSS Feeds
Make A Donation

Mustangs:
Classic Mustang
Mustang II
Fox Body Mustang
sn95 Mustang
New Edge Mustang
s197 Mustang
Mustang Clubs
2007 GT500 Mustang
2009 Mustang
Ford Mustang Prices


Featured Sponsors
Advertising Info

Top 10 Posters
pro50sc17932
nanaki14694
dan04cobra14536
88bluegt14536
addermk214016
ride of the 13720
hotrods_n_bo13332
2000gt4.612516
mustangman0211995
1slo8511780

New Vendors
Extreme Dimension
BMR Fabrication
Year One
Auto Badges
Trickflow
Speedware Motorsports
LTM Global
Late Model Restoration
Southern Mustang Parts
BrandMotion

MustangForums.com is not affiliated with or endorsed by Ford Motor Company.