ATTENTION: USERNAMES & PASSWORDS ARE CASE SENSITIVE
Ford Mustang Forums - Ford Mustang Classifieds - MustangForums.com Photo Galleries - MustangForums.com Chat Room - Create an Account - Mustang News

Go Back   MustangForums.com > Ford Mustang Tech > General Tech




Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-17-2004, 04:19 PM   #1
Ck9887
New Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location:
Posts: 131
Default 5.0 vs 4.6

I know this has been asked but am trying to decide wehter or not I want a 94-95 GT 5.0 or a 96-97 GT 4.6.

I plant to just add a few bol t ons like intake and maybe exhaust.

I will also drag it occasionally.


Whats the pros/cons of each engine?
__________________
90 5.0. 5spd black on black
3.55
Flows
Moroso intake
Pro 5.0 shifter
Ck9887 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2004, 04:27 PM   #2
fantasyfords
New Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 100
Default RE: 5.0 vs 4.6

In my opinion I would go with the 5.0. 96 was the first year of the 4.6 so it is not the best year for that motor. Correct me if im wrong. Probably pick up a nice 94-95 for around 5-6 grand.
__________________
89 lx aod- o/r x pipe, flowmasters, cai, subframe connectors, pulleys, no smog, cobra r hood, 17in cobra y2k's, full body kit also have 00 v6 5sp with cai.
fantasyfords is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2004, 04:37 PM   #3
VertStangGT86
New Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location:
Posts: 1,494
Default RE: 5.0 vs 4.6

Yea, if you go with the 5.0 you'll have more/cheaper options for modding. Nothing wrong with the 4.6 but I just like the 5.0's.
__________________
86 Gt Vert, flowmasters, x-pipe, equal length shorties, 93 block with MAF, CAI, 5 star ponies, KYB's, and underdrive pullies.

"What's with you today? What's with today, today?"
VertStangGT86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2004, 04:50 PM   #4
mdvaldosta
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 8,826
Default RE: 5.0 vs 4.6

Let me say something, and I dont want to offend anyone driving these cars but...

THE 1996 - 1998 MUSTANG GT'S WERE THE WORST MUSTANGS MADE SINCE THE MUSTANG II'S

Sorry for shouting
mdvaldosta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2004, 04:52 PM   #5
Acer2428
Super Moderator
 
Acer2428's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location:
Posts: 7,613
Default RE: 5.0 vs 4.6

ummm... not really... Give the 4.6 the same time that the 5.0 has had and the 96-98's will have their day. Hell, an intake upgrade from livernois will put you at the same levels as a PI headswap w/ a better looking body (opinion of course)
__________________
Acer2428 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2004, 04:57 PM   #6
mdvaldosta
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 8,826
Default RE: 5.0 vs 4.6

Never said they can't be helped, just basically that you if you get one your starting with a severe disadvantage.
mdvaldosta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2004, 05:14 PM   #7
roundman
New Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location:
Posts: 4,813
Default RE: 5.0 vs 4.6

I'd go with a 5.0 model as there are many more mods available and they are easier to work on than the overhead cam 4.6. also there is no replacement for displacement!
__________________

retired and drag racing all I can now that I have the time!
13.533 @ 96.24 mph w/1.780 60', ALL THROTTLE, NO BOTTLE! 13.557 @ 98.24 mph most recentl
roundman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2004, 05:17 PM   #8
VertStangGT86
New Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location:
Posts: 1,494
Default RE: 5.0 vs 4.6

He also said 96-98's not the 4.6 in general. The post 98 4.6's were a lot better.
__________________
86 Gt Vert, flowmasters, x-pipe, equal length shorties, 93 block with MAF, CAI, 5 star ponies, KYB's, and underdrive pullies.

"What's with you today? What's with today, today?"
VertStangGT86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2004, 05:28 PM   #9
Ck9887
New Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location:
Posts: 131
Default RE: 5.0 vs 4.6

How is the reliability on the 5.0's compared to the 4.6?

stock vs stock, which one turns better times at the drag strip? And also, does the different engine cuase any difference in handling?


thanks for all the replies so far
__________________
90 5.0. 5spd black on black
3.55
Flows
Moroso intake
Pro 5.0 shifter
Ck9887 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2004, 06:21 PM   #10
USAMuscle
New Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 1,405
Default RE: 5.0 vs 4.6

Quote:
ORIGINAL: mdvaldosta

Never said they can't be helped, just basically that you if you get one your starting with a severe disadvantage.
True, but they can be had for a lot less $$$ than a newer GT, and you could spend the money saved on a PI head and intake swap and some other mods and walk all over the newer GT's (stock). I personally like the body style better, especially the '96-'98 Saleen models, than the newer body style. It's possible to come out way ahead with a '96-'98 GT for the same amount of money. Anyway, it's all about Mustangs though, and that's what's important.
__________________
Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity.

USAMuscle is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors









New Sponsors


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:35 AM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.