Hello,

I dont know anyone that knows anything about this car i want to buy so i thought you guys were best suited. I was thinking of buying a 1978 Ford Mustang II im not totaly sure on miles but it has new drums, exhaust system, oil pump and some other little things. The man is offering $1,500 and i want to know if this is a good deal and a car worth of spending that money on to eventual restore and be dependent on. Im a newbie looking for my first car and i have a small budget but im willing to learn and build on to the car if needed.

Also im from Portage, Indiana

that vintage mustang is the bastard child, your better off to move up to the fox body mustangs.

yeah....us in the "Ford Family" dont talk about those dark times........

This car you are speaking of NEVER existed! I thought all of them were destroyed as a public service years ago.

ok.... i started reading the history of the Mustang II and well ...... dang this car is hated more than the pinto

i dono if you have ever seen "The Goonies"....but if you have, that car is about the equivlent of "Sloth".

yeah.....at least a pinto would get some laughs and stuff...people would know your just joking....u drive around in a Mustang II and they sorta turn their heads as if they dont see you there.......

ok! i give up! im quiting on the MII idea ill look for a $200 honda civic

ok one last question. Where would be a good website or paper to look for good local deals?


srry im asking you guys these questions but the only guy i know (step father) is a dick and i would rather not talk to him

Look on craigslist.com. There are different sections for several large cities.

the only thing those cars are good for is parts for a real mustang

I wouldnt give $1500 for one, but they arent bad if you can get past the looks. They accept a V8, and parts abound for the suspension. Its used in streetrods extensively.

Ford people look at you like you have a 3rd eye in your forehead, GM people point and laugh. But for a beater they are okay. I have even seen some fast ones, if you can believe that. Restore value isnt much. They had no real performance options and no desireability for anything but a beater.

I agree 120% with Thumping he hit the nail on the head the only thing that I can add is[sm=badidea.gif]

Wouldnt you guys think that in like 30 years an all original 78 mustang would have some serious value. They are very "rare"

Gosh guys, y'all are kinda harsh don't you think ? I'd give my left nut for a nice 78 King Cobra with a 302 and a 4 speed. I'll admit that these cars weren't really well accepted and many of us saw them as the end of an era , BUT .... They're still a Mustang. As far as fast goes, damn skippy they're easily made to be very quick ! I've seen my share of these little lightweight ponies that would dispose of our "purebreds" in short order.

Tyler is right on the money in that these cars are going up in value. Take a gander on ebay at the prices of a nice 74-78 Cobra or King Cobra with a V-8. In fact, a buddy of mine called me this morning about one he found for sale here locally. I'm going to look at it this morning.

Every car has its' niche market and loyal fan base. As I've said before I don't really like spring yellow , I don't like coupes , I don't like 67-70 convertibles , I don't like 6 cylinders of any Mustang vintage ..... BUT it sure as hell doesn't mean that I wouldn't stop to help a Mustang brother on the side of the road with the hood up on a 67 spring yellow convertible with a 6 cylinder. We're all in this boat together guys and if the kid wants to enter our family with a Mustang II , LET HIM !!! Instead we've driven him to look for an F-ing HONDA ???????

JMHO, Dean

local://upfiles/26494/F55EAFFD478D4BD1A41D4432F999B84E.jpg

I think that these cars will turn into a very rare collector car.

ORIGINAL: RSRXION

Gosh guys, y'all are kinda harsh don't you think ? I'd give my left nut for a nice 78 King Cobra with a 302 and a 4 speed. I'll admit that these cars weren't really well accepted and many of us saw them as the end of an era , BUT .... They're still a Mustang. As far as fast goes, damn skippy they're easily made to be very quick ! I've seen my share of these little lightweight ponies that would dispose of our "purebreds" in short order.

Tyler is right on the money in that these cars are going up in value. Take a gander on ebay at the prices of a nice 74-78 Cobra or King Cobra with a V-8. In fact, a buddy of mine called me this morning about one he found for sale here locally. I'm going to look at it this morning.

Every car has its' niche market and loyal fan base. As I've said before I don't really like spring yellow , I don't like coupes , I don't like 67-70 convertibles , I don't like 6 cylinders of any Mustang vintage ..... BUT it sure as hell doesn't mean that I wouldn't stop to help a Mustang brother on the side of the road with the hood up on a 67 spring yellow convertible with a 6 cylinder. We're all in this boat together guys and if the kid wants to enter our family with a Mustang II , LET HIM !!! Instead we've driven him to look for an F-ing HONDA ???????

JMHO, Dean

local://upfiles/26494/F55EAFFD478D4BD1A41D4432F999B84E.jpg


well i mean if its gonna come to ricer vs. mustang II....obviously get the mustang II....but i just think everyone was letting him know how much better a 65-73 would be.....if he likes it, he will buy it....people on a web forum should spend his money for him. :)

The value might go up some, but it wont ever be anything spectacular. They arent bad cars to drive, just kinda homely to most people. I dont mind them, but I dont see much mass appeal in them either. Ever notice how some cars are going up in value while others arent and they look the same, are the same year but one is $20k-$40k more? Performance options. A DragPak car is worth more than a 6 cylinder car, right? A 428CJ 4 speed in the same condition will bring more money than a 289 2v auto, dont you agree? Even if the same body style, same color and options other than engines.

Why isnt the Mustang II going to be high value? Well I know you are all Ford guys but take for an example the GM F body. After 73 the Camaro didnt have anything bigger than a 350 and most V8s were 305s. The 350s were slugs in any form and 74 -92 Camaros arent selling for big $$. Then look at the Trans Am and Formula. They had 455ci engines up to 76, and 400ci untill 79 and with 4 speeds. The value on them is skyrocketing compared to the camaros of the same vintage. Its all about the engine, and the 302 2v in the Mustang II just isnt a muscle engine. So the prices will stay low.

Just cuz a car is old and rare doesnt mean its valuable. It has to have something people want. Check the prices on a stone stock restored model T or A prior to 1932, then look and see how much a LS6 454 Chevelle or a 426 Hemi Cuda is selling for and you might get the point..


I do want to add something.. A Mustang II is far better to me as a driver than a Honda is. If you like the car and can afford it, its your choice man. It just isnt a BOSS 429 sittin there ya know?

realistically i think its got a great basis for a fast sleeper car. who wants to get oned by a homely lil mustang 2? i sure dont, then again, i have a station wagon fetish. I also love weird oddball sleeper cars tho. I dont know what rear end they had, 8.8 maybe? probly 7.5 actually, i dont know. anyway, they have the famed mustang 2 front suspension (duh) and came with 302s, so put in a roller 302 with some gt heads, aod, 8.8, injection, and nobody would know until you leave them in the dust. id say go for it, just dont expect to get much out of it when you sell it.

to me....its like mommy mustang had a wild night with an amc gremlin and out popped the mustang II. :)

yeah, um, bump up to a fox body. the only thing that seems to be fading for these cars are body kits (but they all look like **** anyhoo!) and parts are a dime a dozen and easy to find. it's an all around car for a first build/project. plus they are bound to have a little less rust than something older which will def help in your build.




but seriously, a mustangII?!? i saw one at the parts store the other day, side pipes, 347 stroker. sounded nice, but the only way to make it look good is to go with a clear plexyglass body! i wouldn't use one as a paper weight.

i want to get an 06, 96 and an 86 to go with my 66 (every 10 year model). notice i left out 76 cause they look like turd.

couldnt you just imagine pulling into the local hotspot in this?
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/1977-Mustang-II-Gia-V8-beautiful-clean-and-original_W0QQitemZ4642849933QQcategoryZ6236QQrdZ1Q QcmdZViewItem
but seriously tho, now picture it with a 347/aod/injection. youd have an ugly little pig on wheels that would beat the pants off most fox-bodies on the street. they dont seem like such a bad car to start with, and actually look ok if done in moderation.
this one with some modern wheels doesnt seem like it would be so bad. i could live with it
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/MUSTANG-COBRA-2_W0QQitemZ4642808927QQcategoryZ6236QQrdZ1QQcmdZVi ewItem

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO Don't say Ghia!!! It just aint right!!! Although, the Cobra like others mentioned is, well, sort of acceptable. But any other, with a 4 or 6...just get a Chevette and drive off the bridge. It's quicker and the results are the same. You will be shamed to death and no one will find you!!!!!!!! Just kidding, get what you want. Although, I would rather a rusted 66 for the same money!

thanks all well ive delayed the buying of the MII and im searching for a "REAL" car...... but sadly..... not having any luck finging a good car in my area within my budget.

a mustang's a mustang, you just decided on "heap" years. i wouldn't say not to get it, it's all up to you. BTW, what is your budget? around what amt just to buy the car and how much are you looking to spend afterwards?

If the car is a V-8 hatchback, buy it. If it isn't a rustbucket you can drive it like it is for a while and sell it when you find something better. The car I looked at today is a V-6 hatchback that is rock solid for $ 1,200.00. I would have jumped all over it if it had been a V-8 , 4 speed car. No rust at all, a bent hood and broken grille, white with good black interior , etc ... jmho, dEAN

they are cute:D



local://upfiles/19521/194A083B324E496FB10E2E1FF6C50BF8.jpg

I think the cobras and king cobras are a very nice looking car. It's something that no one else will have. How many II Cobra's have you seen driving around?

ORIGINAL: ideal_mustangs

I think the cobras and king cobras are a very nice looking car. It's something that no one else will have. How many II Cobra's have you seen driving around?


could be a very logical reason u dont see many around. :)

Heres a link to Mustang II site http://www.mustangii.org might help you make up you mind. I had a 76 cobra built up the motor it had a 4 speed
It didn't last long started to twist things cracked the seams at the rear Quarter panel and roof line. went like hell though :D

i got some more info from what i see and my research its the 78 black Mach 1 or fastback and these are the new parts he has put on : Brakes, Roters, Calippers, drums, clutch, crank seal, oil pump, and exhaust system. It does have minor rust and inside looks just fine. Taking the test drive tomorrow.

also i will try to get some pics of it

Is the car a V-8 ?

Unless it's a Cobra then the value will never go up. The fact that they're rare doesn't mean anything until there is demand for them which, as this site is proving, there wont be. But I guess you never know because Edsel's sell for a lot of $$ these days :D

ORIGINAL: mustanglover66

the only thing those cars are good for is parts for a real mustang

Can you please explain yourself? If you need a 74 to 78 for parts, then it must be worth something. Then the only thing useable would be the engine and tranny.

Tipsup..by now you have opinions left and rigth , however it all up to you..if you like the car go for it!!!, if you are not sure do some more reserch and also consider if after buying it is the car that you are going to be proud of it, also you may consider to wait and save a bit more and go for a restorable nice 65 66 coupe..but is only my opinion the important thing is that in the long run is yours the one that matters..good luck and let us know:)

Thanks Dean for your support.

To you other guys who claim to be part of the Ford family, I don't care for '79 to '86 Stangs. My brother has an '87GT convertible, and 2 of my nephews have owned early 90s Cobra convertibles. The biggest problem with Fox body Mustangs, is they don't look like a Mustang, yet they became very popular. They don't have one thing in common with a 60s Mustang. No styling, a detuned 302 until they brought back the GT.

Put a '75 to '78 that has a V8 with equal horsepower up against a 60 something, and I guarantee you, it will out perform it on any road course.

yeah, as long as the suspension is stock! the suspension from the 60's had less technology than the 70's suspension.

as per the fox bods. i like 'em, i have a 66 sitting in my driveway, my first car was an 86 stang, just got rid of an 89 stang and would love to find another fox gt.

you say they dont look like a mustang, well, the 64 1/2 thru 69 had very common body lines, the 70-73 started getting a little boxy, but a very one of a kind body style, 74-78 looked like early stangs that got smooshed, the 79-86 would have more closely resembled the classics, as they had the set in headlights, and the 87-93's had the same body lines. than the sn-95's come out, based on the fox chassis, and they had a bit more "style" to them. than the new edge sn-95's came out, somewhat reverting to the boxy lines of the ever present fox, and our newest addition to the family, a very god attempt to revive the classic body lines. i will admit, when that first came out i didn't like it at all. i thought it was a lame ass attempt for ford to sell more stangs, but i must admit, that style has grown on me big time. yeah, if they kept the stang looking exactly the same forever all of them would look cool as the origional, but come on dude. people will get tired of that quick and there wouldn't be a "classic" section to this forum.

here i agree by disagreeing.

I'll take a 78 King Cobra over ANY 65-73 coupe anyday. I think it's true that most people enjoy the cars they couldn't have as teenagers. We were way too poor to even consider me getting a brand new car in high school. BUT.... I still took my happy ass down to the Ford dealers and sat in everything that I thought was cool.

It's kind of funny, there was a 1979 F-150 Indianapolis 500 truck on the showroom here at Bobby Hopper Ford in Springdale, Arkansas. I remember sitting in that truck and marveling at its' beauty. I wanted it terribly . I watched the truck grow old right here in this same little town and I was broken hearted every time I saw it had a new dent or scrape. Then one day 20 plus years later , I was taking my daughter to softball practice and there it sat on the roadside with a for sale sign. I stopped and bought it on the spot. THE VERY SAME TRUCK that I sat in as a wide eyed 16 year old now lives in my driveway. I'll restore her this winter.

Most people don't give a rodents' anus ( that's a rats' ass in laymans terms ) about the F-150 Indy trucks , but I do. It's all in the eye of the beholder. Now where is that red King Cobra that sat on the Lewis Ford showroom ? I'd buy it if I could find it. I won a million races and traveled a million miles in that car, all in the course of one summer on the dealers showroom floor.

Kind of funny how we get so attached to an inanimate object huh ? Long live the 74-78 Mustang II's and every other year and model of our beloved Mustangs. I suspect there's a stable waiting for just about any of them.

JMHO, Dean

local://upfiles/26494/A425BE51050B4FF4B83768B0ED167721.jpg

ORIGINAL: Clu7ch

you say they dont look like a mustang, well, the 64 1/2 thru 69 had very common body lines,... 74-78 looked like early stangs that got smooshed, the 79-86 would have more closely resembled the classics, as they had the set in headlights, and the 87-93's had the same body lines. than the sn-95's come out, based on the fox chassis, and they had a bit more "style" to them. than the new edge sn-95's came out, somewhat reverting to the boxy lines of the ever present fox, and our newest addition to the family, a very god attempt to revive the classic body lines. i will admit, when that first came out i didn't like it at all. i thought it was a lame ass attempt for ford to sell more stangs, but i must admit, that style has grown on me big time. yeah, if they kept the stang looking exactly the same forever all of them would look cool as the origional, but come on dude. people will get tired of that quick and there wouldn't be a "classic" section to this forum.

here i agree by disagreeing.

The '05 Mustang is very retro. It has "THE" Mustang "side" body styling like the '74 to '78 and the '94 up, except the plus of the '94 up was the had style and aerodynamics. The '79 to '93 look plain. The only reason they became so popular, was because they were cheaper, and more common than Camaros.

I don't know how old you are, but growing up with 60s and early 70s muscle, gives me an appreciation for the new Mustang, the potential Camaro, the potential Challenger. I was impressed with the retro Thunderbird, and it's resemblance to the 50s style that outsold the Corvette. I liked the mid 90s Impala SS, and it's bold look, that was far better than a front wheel drive Bonneville SSE, or the newer Impala, or the Nova that looked like a Chevette. I was upset by the way Chrysler went bananas with front wheel drive in the 80s, and the new Labaron, Charger, Daytona, the Shelby Omni etc.

I realize that everybody has their own taste, but Ford got away from what made the Mustang so stylish, with the Fox body. That's why they had to came back to a retro look.

ORIGINAL: 76MACH1
The '05 Mustang is very retro. It has "THE" Mustang "side" body styling like the '74 to '78 and the '94 up, except the plus of the '94 up was the had style and aerodynamics. The '79 to '93 look plain. The only reason they became so popular, was because they were cheaper, and more common than Camaros.

I don't know how old you are, but growing up with 60s and early 70s muscle, gives me an appreciation for the new Mustang, the potential Camaro, the potential Challenger. I was impressed with the retro Thunderbird, and it's resemblance to the 50s style that outsold the Corvette. I liked the mid 90s Impala SS, and it's bold look, that was far better than a front wheel drive Bonneville SSE, or the newer Impala, or the Nova that looked like a Chevette. I was upset by the way Chrysler went bananas with front wheel drive in the 80s, and the new Labaron, Charger, Daytona, the Shelby Omni etc.

I realize that everybody has their own taste, but Ford got away from what made the Mustang so stylish, with the Fox body. That's why they had to came back to a retro look.


i do agree that they were extremely understyled, but they do have a tendancy to grow on people. you say mustang and you'll either make someone think of a fox bod or a 64 1/2-69. i also LOVED the "retro" job they did on the t-bird and totally agree with the Novette! i'm glad dodge (chrysler) came back out with a rear drive platform, just as i was when lincoln came out with the LS rear drive platform.

So you agree the Fox body was under styled. That was my point, and you and I can agree. And disagree on other points

Same goes for the bobtail Bronco, and the next generations, including the II.

not so sure about teh "bob tail bronco" got a pic?

but yeah, i see what i did there i put "i agree by disagreeing", but i ment to say, "i agree and disagree"

i agree that the foxes were understyled, but that helped with "blending in" and i disagree with (unless i interpreted it wrong) the comment about the other mustangs not looking like "mustangs". like i had said in regards to that was, if ALL mustangs looked the same, they really wouldn't be as diverse as they are and there wouldn't be a "classic section" on a technicallity.

The "bobtail" was a reference to the original '66 to '77 Broncos. This isn't mine, but it shows the style I fell in love with.



local://upfiles/39029/C1CCFBD52B8344AABB249E733BC5FC4B.jpg

local://upfiles/39029/CB1A740036024BA6A7974AD1EA596F44.jpg

It cracks me up when Mustang "Enthusiasts" get so pissy about the IIs. Guess what kiddies... nothing had performance at that time in the '70s. Even the Trans-Ams and Vettes were performance choked.

What do you think would have happened to your precious Mustang line if the II was never produced? The same thing that almost happened in '94... it would have been killed, buried and forgotten. Or worse yet... forgotten until someone with no imagination decides to resurrect it as a minivan like the poor Fairlane -

Then:
http://www.yeticans.com/images/oldfairlane.jpg

Now:
http://www.yeticans.com/images/newfairlane.jpg

You guys should give a little thanks to that car every time you see one on the street. If it wasn't for the II you'd probably be trying to hot rod a Explorer knock off with a pony on the grille.

ORIGINAL: lClutchl

It cracks me up when Mustang "Enthusiasts" get so pissy about the IIs. Guess what kiddies... nothing had performance at that time in the '70s. Even the Trans-Ams and Vettes were performance choked.

What do you think would have happened to your precious Mustang line if the II was never produced? The same thing that almost happened in '94... it would have been killed, buried and forgotten. Or worse yet... forgotten until someone with no imagination decides to resurrect it as a minivan like the poor Fairlane -

Then:
http://www.yeticans.com/images/oldfairlane.jpg

Now:
http://www.yeticans.com/images/newfairlane.jpg

You guys should give a little thanks to that car every time you see one on the street. If it wasn't for the II you'd probably be trying to hot rod a Explorer knock off with a pony on the grille.





i still like how this:

http://www.aaca.org/hershey/2001photos/35%20FORD%20PHAETON.jpg

became this:

http://www.autogazeta.com/g/406/phaeton.jpg

you wanna talk about WTF!?!

ORIGINAL: Clu7ch


ORIGINAL: lClutchl

It cracks me up when Mustang "Enthusiasts" get so pissy about the IIs. Guess what kiddies... nothing had performance at that time in the '70s. Even the Trans-Ams and Vettes were performance choked.

What do you think would have happened to your precious Mustang line if the II was never produced? The same thing that almost happened in '94... it would have been killed, buried and forgotten. Or worse yet... forgotten until someone with no imagination decides to resurrect it as a minivan like the poor Fairlane -

Then:
http://www.yeticans.com/images/oldfairlane.jpg

Now:
http://www.yeticans.com/images/newfairlane.jpg

You guys should give a little thanks to that car every time you see one on the street. If it wasn't for the II you'd probably be trying to hot rod a Explorer knock off with a pony on the grille.





i still like how this:

http://www.aaca.org/hershey/2001photos/35%20FORD%20PHAETON.jpg

became this:

http://www.autogazeta.com/g/406/phaeton.jpg

you wanna talk about WTF!?!

I like the old purple one better.:D The gas crunch in the 70's really wreaked havok with performance cars. If you lived through those years as an adult, you will remember the gas lines. Hey, there were even gas rage shootings at the pumps. The norm back then for a regular Mustang was the 4 banger. If you owned a V8, you were in high cotton, but short on change to buy gas. The Foxes are in a world of their own, and IMO, served their purpose during those short on gas years. But, we have to come to reality. They were weak.....not only with engine performance, but suspension, etc. Now, the 80's brought on the 5.0 which turned out to be quite a performer, but not like the 60's muscle cars. Today, we enjoy the years of 2000 where performance has returned to what it used to be during the 60's, but with modern technology. However, the old gas crunch gremlin is facing us again, so these days of glory may be short lived.

I believe there is an old 78 king cobra down the road just sitting in the yard. I dont think it runs. Ill see if I an get pics.

I bought one of those new in 77, nice little 302 automatic...worst piese of junk I ever made a payment on, dumped it as soon as I could for a new 79 T-bird that wasnt a lot better, but at least an improvement

Well, the II's may not be the prettiest car in the world but like I said before, It's something different. I like driving something different that everyone else. I know there are a lot of mustangs like mine around, but I have the only one in my town. My daily driver is a 1970 F100 and it is a one of a kind in my town. I think it would be cool too to drive a king cobra or even a clone of a king cobra. There's not a lot of people who seen them and most would probably even look and say, Hey, what kind of car is it? Everyone has the fox bodies and everyone has the "classics" but the II's are something different to set you apart. Just my little opinion.

I think the coolest part of owning a nice Mustang II would be the overall impression that it's a turd. As evidenced here most people think they are gutless and won't get out of their own way. Wouldn't it be sweet to shove a 351 Clevor into a nice little Cobra II ? Can't you just see the looks when a big horse motor sends the tires up in smoke ? Those little cars look bad ass guys and like it or not they're part of the breed. Don't bash them ... welcome them. Don't hate them ..... embrace them.

A few of the bow tie faithful turned their backs on the Camaros and look what happened. Now the Chevy crowd is reduced to hoping GM stays out of bankruptcy long enough to build their beloved Camaro's namesake and praying that the car lives up to the hype. I'll take a 78 King Cobra over a 2009 , 2010 , 2011 ?????????????????? Camaro anyday.

JMHO, Dean

http://www.seriouswheels.com/pics-1970-1979/1978-Ford-Mustang-King-Cobra.jpg
You all have to admit its a pretty nice looking car.

ORIGINAL: ideal_mustangs

Well, the II's may not be the prettiest car in the world but like I said before, It's something different. I like driving something different that everyone else. ... but I have the only one in my town. ... There's not a lot of people who seen them and most would probably even look and say, Hey, what kind of car is it? ... but the II's are something different to set you apart. Just my little opinion.

Thanks. I love driving down the street, and hearing young kids say "cool car". Most of the Mustang IIs were gone before the 90s due to accident or rust, so a lot of kids have never seen one. I purchased my second II in '02, first one was back in '78. I now have 2 fastbacks(hatchbacks), and only know of 2 other Mustang IIs within 25 to 30 miles from where I live. As I drive mine almost daily, everybody knows my car.

Here is a pic of my II just after I bought it. Yes it needs paint, but it's almost 31 years old.

local://upfiles/39029/3C6E87B7CD0F437780863E76E1B3AC68.jpg

That car gives me wood ! The white with gold cars are very nice ..........BUT , the red with gold trim cars are the bomb diggity ! Just my humble and slightly demented opinion. Dean

For those who want to bash the II -- here are my 2 cents.

I own 2 of these, both are '78 Ghia's. Have you even looked at ebay lately? Yes, you can pick up a Mustang II cheaper than the other shelby's, etc., but the pricing on these cars have nearly doubled in a just a couple of years. It is not uncommon to pay over $10,000 for one on Ebay. One of the '78s I have owned since '79. And it has been my daily driver. The other '78 I purchased last July. Now I can tell you from my own experience that my first '78 - with a stock 302 V-8 in it and auto transmission - BEAT Corvettes in '79. So like another poster said, none of the cars during that time had the power that they do today. But realistically, look at how much hp you get in todays cars. I've got a Ford rebuilt 302 in my '78 that has 200 HP - and that along with the lighter body will still outrun some of the newer cars today - STOCK. Parts have become easier to find than they used to, and the value is going up on them.

I personally have rarely had anyone come up and snub me on my car. One fellow Mustanger did at a local car show last year - he said "I always thought those were the ugliest cars." I was appalled! I know a lot of people don't care for them, but really - if you can't say something nice - then keep you pie hole shut! Ironically, I placed higher than he did at the car show.

Bottom line -- it is your decision whether to buy a Mustang II or not. But if you like it and have the money to buy it - you will enjoy driving it. And if it weren't for these little Mustang II's there would not have been any Mustangs after that!

A Mustang II is a Mustang TOO!

The mustang 2 is without a doubt the ugliest and biggest POS Mustang ever made. I'd be ashamed to drive one of those around. They are worth more as PARTS cars then they deserve to be for a normal car.

Is it just me or is that air cleaner sideways?

ORIGINAL: Decurion

couldnt you just imagine pulling into the local hotspot in this?
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/1977-Mustang-II-Gia-V8-beautiful-clean-and-original_W0QQitemZ4642849933QQcategoryZ6236QQrdZ1Q QcmdZViewItem
but seriously tho, now picture it with a 347/aod/injection. youd have an ugly little pig on wheels that would beat the pants off most fox-bodies on the street. they dont seem like such a bad car to start with, and actually look ok if done in moderation.
this one with some modern wheels doesnt seem like it would be so bad. i could live with it
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/MUSTANG-COBRA-2_W0QQitemZ4642808927QQcategoryZ6236QQrdZ1QQcmdZVi ewItem

ORIGINAL: 76MACH1

Thanks. I love driving down the street, and hearing young kids say "cool car". Most of the Mustang IIs were gone before the 90s due to accident or rust, so a lot of kids have never seen one. I purchased my second II in '02, first one was back in '78. I now have 2 fastbacks(hatchbacks), and only know of 2 other Mustang IIs within 25 to 30 miles from where I live. As I drive mine almost daily, everybody knows my car.

Here is a pic of my II just after I bought it. Yes it needs paint, but it's almost 31 years old.

local://upfiles/39029/3C6E87B7CD0F437780863E76E1B3AC68.jpg


That car is BAD ASS.