Mustang Forums   Mustang Classifieds   Photo Gallery   Calendars   Search   Live Chat   Contact MF   Sponsors
  Mustang Recalls   Mustang TSB's   News   Timeslips   Timeline   Wallpaper   Member List   Register   Login

RE: fineally took down an SRT4!

  Printable Version
Mustang >> Speed Zone >> Street/Strip >> RE: fineally took down an SRT4! Page: <<   < prev  7 8 9 [10] 11   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: fineally took down an SRT4! - 6/27/2006 7:08:34 PM   
Adams_02GT


Posts: 542
Joined: 6/9/2006
Status: offline
Adams_02GT's photo gallery
took me an hour just to read all this! nice kill!

_____________________________



drhoward is my best friend

(in reply to bluebeastsrt)
Post #: 181
RE: fineally took down an SRT4! - 6/27/2006 7:10:26 PM   
redass02gt



Posts: 7040
Joined: 4/21/2005
Status: online




this made my day.

_____________________________

Pitchforks and torches are the answers to all of our nation's problems. KOBE4MVP

(in reply to Adams_02GT)
Post #: 182
RE: fineally took down an SRT4! - 6/27/2006 7:15:14 PM   
98LS1


Posts: 7043
Joined: 10/30/2003
Status: offline
98LS1's photo gallery

quote:

ORIGINAL: White2000GT

I like FI cars but Ford always has to use FI to keep up with GM.


I think it is more like this: GM always has to use huge displacement engines to keep up with Ford's small displacement FI engines. i.e. the 6.0L LS2 compared to Ford's 4.6L. Even with the S/C'd 5.4's in the GT and in the GT500, GM has the LS7 sitting at 7.0L just to turn over similar numbers. That's a 1.6L difference (or the entire displacement of a Honda engine ). I think it is great what Ford engineers have accomplished with the small displacement engines.



Do you understand what FI does to a motor? And the increased displacement it "adds"? Ever wonder why GM motors get 30mpg with a .600+ life cam in them, yet Ford's small motors only get 20mpg?

I'm biased, of course, there's no way to tell you guys otherwise, but just look at the cars out nowadays. Ford just can't engineer a motor to make the power GM does. They build a $80k car, the GT500, and GM makes more power out of a $60k naturally aspirated Vette. When GM builds FI cars, what happens then? Just look at the GNX for example. What's gonna happen when GM builds the "Blue Devil?" LS7 + boost......it's crazy.

_____________________________

1998 TransAm

Idle/Walkaround

(in reply to White2000GT)
Post #: 183
RE: fineally took down an SRT4! - 6/27/2006 7:52:26 PM   
Mustang9668


Posts: 138
Joined: 11/23/2005
Status: offline

[/quote]
I'm biased, of course, there's no way to tell you guys otherwise, but just look at the cars out nowadays. Ford just can't engineer a motor to make the power GM does. They build a $80k car, the GT500, and GM makes more power out of a $60k naturally aspirated Vette. When GM builds FI cars, what happens then? Just look at the GNX for example. What's gonna happen when GM builds the "Blue Devil?" LS7 + boost......it's crazy.
[/quote]

Where does 80k come from? The MSRP is 40K. Pre orders on ebay shouldn't be a factor in this b/c the prices won't be anywhere near that high in a few months.

_____________________________

96 GT Conv. auto BBK TB, MAC CAI, BBK O/R H-Pipe, 2 chambers, Saleen body kit, Chrome Cobra R's
68 Mustang GT Conv. 289 with Edel. Perf. carb, intake, cam, Eleanor front end and side scoops,67 GT500 hood and deck lid

(in reply to 98LS1)
Post #: 184
RE: fineally took down an SRT4! - 6/27/2006 7:53:30 PM   
pLaGuIeNtO


Posts: 159
Joined: 1/8/2006
Status: offline
There is one SRT-4 around here that is just driving me crazy, the owner has easily put over 20k in that car, is has a HUGE Hahn turbo and just to make things better it also runs with nitrous oxide, I found a small video of that car in Youtube : Sick SRT-4

What you guys think is needed to take this car down? I have a couple of mods in my 03 GT like : CAI, 75mm TB and plenum, Headers, H-pipe no Cats, Magnapacks, 4.10´s, Computer programmer,etc. I know for sure that is not enough at all but I really would like to know what would be enough to beat it.

Thanks!! have a nice day!!

_____________________________


Mustang 2007 GT
-Procharger 12psi
-JBA LT´s
-O/R X-Pipe
-3.73 gears
-Tokico D-specs
-Eibach Pro kit
-BMR Upper and Lower Control Arms

(in reply to 98LS1)
Post #: 185
RE: fineally took down an SRT4! - 6/27/2006 8:18:24 PM   
Shaybuttainbk


Posts: 388
Joined: 3/19/2006
Status: offline
i hate srt-4's, hate hate hate hate. plus their front wheel drivem which make me hate them even more

_____________________________

2006 Mustang GT (Stock)
20" Zenneti Wide Trac

(in reply to 1BAD3V)
Post #: 186
RE: fineally took down an SRT4! - 6/27/2006 10:50:34 PM   
STANMAN

 


Posts: 1217
Joined: 7/5/2005
Status: offline
STANMAN's photo gallery

quote:

ORIGINAL: pLaGuIeNtO

There is one SRT-4 around here that is just driving me crazy, the owner has easily put over 20k in that car, is has a HUGE Hahn turbo and just to make things better it also runs with nitrous oxide, I found a small video of that car in Youtube : Sick SRT-4

What you guys think is needed to take this car down? I have a couple of mods in my 03 GT like : CAI, 75mm TB and plenum, Headers, H-pipe no Cats, Magnapacks, 4.10´s, Computer programmer,etc. I know for sure that is not enough at all but I really would like to know what would be enough to beat it.

Thanks!! have a nice day!!


If he can drive and put the power down, you'll need a 10 second car. Hahn turbos are not that big, definatly not the biggest you can put w/o modding the firewall, (that would be a GT35R) but with the NOS, a 10 second car should be able to run with that Neon.


_____________________________



Saleen twin screw. Enough said!

(in reply to pLaGuIeNtO)
Post #: 187
RE: fineally took down an SRT4! - 6/28/2006 12:57:39 AM   
JT76



Team MF Member #281
Posts: 4267
Joined: 8/30/2005
From: IN THE ZONE
Status: offline
JT76's photo gallery
i am also a fan of ford engines because of what they can do with small displacement.... however i am somewhat of a "rare breed" , while most guys are eiether Ford guys or Chevy guys (sometimes a touch of Mopar or some import) I like Chevy and Ford, the classic Muscle car showdown. For that reason i recently picked up a 1968 Camaro SS out of some guys garage and plan to restore it someday. It will be great to have 2 of the biggest rivals of the muscle car era in my garage. Before i had my 02' Mustang, i drove a Lt1 Camaro for a while and was very impressed with it. Mustangs will always be my favorite ( Terminator Cobra, 67-70 Shelbys, 68-67 fastback just to name my top favorites) But a very close second will always be the chevy camaro (67-69's namely SS and Yenko's and 98-02 Ls1's) However, i dont like mopars, more spacificaly NEON Srt4 (and yes its a neon, i hate the ppl that say its not a neon its an SRT4) , probably never will and i think its the fact that every cocky poser around here has an SRT4, plus the fact that they took a Chrysler 300, doctored it up and put on the charger badge, its just turned me off. Also i am sure i will get bashed for this and everyone kisses its ass but i also dont like the Viper, i think its overrated for a 10 cylinder car. Give me a Terminator or a Vette any day over that thing. Just my personal prefrence....and as long as i am on a rant, i will say that chevy has also pissed me off lately by putting an "SS" badge on every POS they make...plus they killed the camaro in 02'.................wait a second... i started this thread didnt i?

_____________________________


2000 Trans Am WS6 M6
doing a lot with a little



(in reply to STANMAN)
Post #: 188
RE: fineally took down an SRT4! - 6/28/2006 2:34:14 AM   
White2000GT


Posts: 1274
Joined: 4/30/2004
Status: offline
White2000GT's photo gallery

quote:

ORIGINAL: redass02gt





this made my day.


I'm glad you approve! Haha!

And yes 98LS1, I am well aware what FI does to an engine. And I am well aware that GM engines still get decent gas mileage even though they have huge displacements. Believe me, I'm not hating on GM at all. I think the C6 ZO6 is the most monstrous N/A V8 on the road today and I would give my left nut to own one. My whole point is that Ford is able to make huge power out of small displacement engines. But so many people are trying to make it sound like Ford engineers couldn't build a similar engine themselves. I'm sure if Ford was to resurrect the 428 and bring it into the 21st century with modern day technology that is available to them that they could have a genuine N/A monster too.
"Blue Devil" huh? LS7 + boost = death sentence waiting to happen. That would be crazy power!

_____________________________

2000 GT 5-speed
BBK LT headers
BBK O/R X pipe
Magnaflow Magnapack catback
UPR CAI.
Motive Gear 3.73

(in reply to redass02gt)
Post #: 189
RE: fineally took down an SRT4! - 6/28/2006 2:48:20 AM   
JT76



Team MF Member #281
Posts: 4267
Joined: 8/30/2005
From: IN THE ZONE
Status: offline
JT76's photo gallery

quote:

ORIGINAL: White2000GT


quote:

ORIGINAL: redass02gt





this made my day.


I'm glad you approve! Haha!

And yes 98LS1, I am well aware what FI does to an engine. And I am well aware that GM engines still get decent gas mileage even though they have huge displacements. Believe me, I'm not hating on GM at all. I think the C6 ZO6 is the most monstrous N/A V8 on the road today and I would give my left nut to own one. My whole point is that Ford is able to make huge power out of small displacement engines. But so many people are trying to make it sound like Ford engineers couldn't build a similar engine themselves. I'm sure if Ford was to resurrect the 428 and bring it into the 21st century with modern day technology that is available to them that they could have a genuine N/A monster too.
"Blue Devil" huh? LS7 + boost = death sentence waiting to happen. That would be crazy power!

where do i sign up

_____________________________


2000 Trans Am WS6 M6
doing a lot with a little



(in reply to White2000GT)
Post #: 190
RE: fineally took down an SRT4! - 6/28/2006 3:40:58 AM   
White2000GT


Posts: 1274
Joined: 4/30/2004
Status: offline
White2000GT's photo gallery

quote:

ORIGINAL: stanggang1892


quote:

ORIGINAL: White2000GT


quote:

ORIGINAL: redass02gt





this made my day.


I'm glad you approve! Haha!

And yes 98LS1, I am well aware what FI does to an engine. And I am well aware that GM engines still get decent gas mileage even though they have huge displacements. Believe me, I'm not hating on GM at all. I think the C6 ZO6 is the most monstrous N/A V8 on the road today and I would give my left nut to own one. My whole point is that Ford is able to make huge power out of small displacement engines. But so many people are trying to make it sound like Ford engineers couldn't build a similar engine themselves. I'm sure if Ford was to resurrect the 428 and bring it into the 21st century with modern day technology that is available to them that they could have a genuine N/A monster too.
"Blue Devil" huh? LS7 + boost = death sentence waiting to happen. That would be crazy power!

where do i sign up


You've already got one.

_____________________________

2000 GT 5-speed
BBK LT headers
BBK O/R X pipe
Magnaflow Magnapack catback
UPR CAI.
Motive Gear 3.73

(in reply to JT76)
Post #: 191
RE: fineally took down an SRT4! - 6/28/2006 3:52:28 AM   
JT76



Team MF Member #281
Posts: 4267
Joined: 8/30/2005
From: IN THE ZONE
Status: offline
JT76's photo gallery
quote:

ORIGINAL: White2000GT


quote:

ORIGINAL: stanggang1892


quote:

ORIGINAL: White2000GT


quote:

ORIGINAL: redass02gt





this made my day.


I'm glad you approve! Haha!

And yes 98LS1, I am well aware what FI does to an engine. And I am well aware that GM engines still get decent gas mileage even though they have huge displacements. Believe me, I'm not hating on GM at all. I think the C6 ZO6 is the most monstrous N/A V8 on the road today and I would give my left nut to own one. My whole point is that Ford is able to make huge power out of small displacement engines. But so many people are trying to make it sound like Ford engineers couldn't build a similar engine themselves. I'm sure if Ford was to resurrect the 428 and bring it into the 21st century with modern day technology that is available to them that they could have a genuine N/A monster too.
"Blue Devil" huh? LS7 + boost = death sentence waiting to happen. That would be crazy power!

where do i sign up


You've already got one.


yeah , but imagine if they brought that back with todays tech .......nothing would touch it

< Message edited by stanggang1892 -- 6/28/2006 3:53:29 AM >


_____________________________


2000 Trans Am WS6 M6
doing a lot with a little



(in reply to White2000GT)
Post #: 192
RE: fineally took down an SRT4! - 6/28/2006 5:17:40 AM   
White2000GT


Posts: 1274
Joined: 4/30/2004
Status: offline
White2000GT's photo gallery

quote:

ORIGINAL: stanggang1892


yeah , but imagine if they brought that back with todays tech .......nothing would touch it


We could always hope.

_____________________________

2000 GT 5-speed
BBK LT headers
BBK O/R X pipe
Magnaflow Magnapack catback
UPR CAI.
Motive Gear 3.73

(in reply to JT76)
Post #: 193
RE: fineally took down an SRT4! - 6/28/2006 4:03:55 PM   
98LS1


Posts: 7043
Joined: 10/30/2003
Status: offline
98LS1's photo gallery

quote:

ORIGINAL: stanggang1892

yeah , but imagine if they brought that back with todays tech .......nothing would touch it


Because it'd be fuel injected?

_____________________________

1998 TransAm

Idle/Walkaround

(in reply to JT76)
Post #: 194
RE: fineally took down an SRT4! - 6/28/2006 4:31:24 PM   
eindow


Posts: 1079
Joined: 3/17/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: STANMAN


If he can drive and put the power down, you'll need a 10 second car. Hahn turbos are not that big, definatly not the biggest you can put w/o modding the firewall, (that would be a GT35R) but with the NOS, a 10 second car should be able to run with that Neon.



Hey Stan you do realize you sound like a ricer when you say that right.... Remember NOS is just a brand...

RICER....

_____________________________

04 Cobra Conv. 8.1@85mph (Bone Stock)
03 Cobra Coupe 7.5@93mph (2.9 Pulley,K&N,Exhaust)
05 STI 8.5@80mph (Bone Stock)
& Others
Still the KING of S/S

(in reply to STANMAN)
Post #: 195
RE: fineally took down an SRT4! - 6/28/2006 8:44:42 PM   
JT76



Team MF Member #281
Posts: 4267
Joined: 8/30/2005
From: IN THE ZONE
Status: offline
JT76's photo gallery

quote:

ORIGINAL: 98LS1


quote:

ORIGINAL: stanggang1892

yeah , but imagine if they brought that back with todays tech .......nothing would touch it


Because it'd be fuel injected?


well the 428's of old were great for their time but stock for stock, todays engines are much better.......just look at what chevy can do with the 350 LS1 ( i know its not 350 its like 347 or something but you know what i mean) ii imagine that extra displacement can be put to good use

_____________________________


2000 Trans Am WS6 M6
doing a lot with a little



(in reply to 98LS1)
Post #: 196
RE: fineally took down an SRT4! - 6/28/2006 8:55:00 PM   
98LS1


Posts: 7043
Joined: 10/30/2003
Status: offline
98LS1's photo gallery
That's all in the engineering...there's absolutely nothing interchangeable with a SB 350 to an LS1. Plus the LS1 is an all aluminum motor. The heads on the LS1 are the best engineered of any small block to date...well, until the LS7 heads and such, but they're all built on the same platform.

Just b/c a motor is large doesn't mean it's going to perform. That's like comparing the old 427 to the new small block, LS based 427. It's a whole new motor man.

If Ford wanted to build a new 428, it'd be just that, a NEW 428. It'd be nothing like the old one.

_____________________________

1998 TransAm

Idle/Walkaround

(in reply to JT76)
Post #: 197
RE: fineally took down an SRT4! - 6/28/2006 9:44:48 PM   
mikey5.0

 

Posts: 18
Joined: 6/2/2006
Status: offline
SRT the fastest car on the road these days. looks like i might have to start my 4V 351c bulid soon but bfore i do that i would like to beat one with the 5.0 frist i have to say atleast us stangboys have something challageing from the FWD cars. I was being a smart ass on the frist comment lol.


mikey

_____________________________

83' capri 306ci stock rods/ARP bolts stock crank ,comp mag timing chain, FMS E303, RPM intake, 600cfm carb, sucky milled E6s, TFS springs,BBk headers, custom Hpipe, flowmaster 2chs with dumps, C4 trans, 3:73s SSM UCAs, svo lowers, 3way drag shocks.

(in reply to 98LS1)
Post #: 198
RE: fineally took down an SRT4! - 6/28/2006 10:18:22 PM   
STANMAN

 


Posts: 1217
Joined: 7/5/2005
Status: offline
STANMAN's photo gallery

quote:

ORIGINAL: eindow


quote:

ORIGINAL: STANMAN


If he can drive and put the power down, you'll need a 10 second car. Hahn turbos are not that big, definatly not the biggest you can put w/o modding the firewall, (that would be a GT35R) but with the NOS, a 10 second car should be able to run with that Neon.



Hey Stan you do realize you sound like a ricer when you say that right.... Remember NOS is just a brand...

RICER....



Only babies need the bottle, lol!!!

And I see the same pic is on here as on Camaro forums. Please change it to how I requested over there, lol!!

_____________________________



Saleen twin screw. Enough said!

(in reply to eindow)
Post #: 199
RE: fineally took down an SRT4! - 6/29/2006 3:23:49 AM   
White2000GT


Posts: 1274
Joined: 4/30/2004
Status: offline
White2000GT's photo gallery

quote:

ORIGINAL: 98LS1

That's all in the engineering...there's absolutely nothing interchangeable with a SB 350 to an LS1. Plus the LS1 is an all aluminum motor. The heads on the LS1 are the best engineered of any small block to date...well, until the LS7 heads and such, but they're all built on the same platform.

Just b/c a motor is large doesn't mean it's going to perform. That's like comparing the old 427 to the new small block, LS based 427. It's a whole new motor man.

If Ford wanted to build a new 428, it'd be just that, a NEW 428. It'd be nothing like the old one.


But that's just the point. Even Ford's engineers wouldn't be stupid enough to buy a couple of old 428's off of Ebay and slap them in a new car. Of course they would reengineer the engine. I'm sure they would even learn a few things from the GM engineers and strive to put the best possible flowing heads and intake manifold, and figure out the best cam configuration to produce the maximum amount of power from the engine. We all know it's not gonna happen though.

_____________________________

2000 GT 5-speed
BBK LT headers
BBK O/R X pipe
Magnaflow Magnapack catback
UPR CAI.
Motive Gear 3.73

(in reply to 98LS1)
Post #: 200
Login OR Register now to post a reply to this forum topic.
Page:   <<   < prev  7 8 9 [10] 11   next >   >>

 

 
Mustang Forums >> Speed Zone >> Street/Strip
Jump to:
Forum Rules & FAQ
Today's Posts
Most Active Topics
RSS Feeds
Make A Donation

Mustangs:
Classic Mustang
Mustang II
Fox Body Mustang
sn95 Mustang
New Edge Mustang
s197 Mustang
Mustang Clubs
2007 GT500 Mustang
2009 Mustang
Ford Mustang Prices


Featured Sponsors
Advertising Info

Top 10 Posters