Mustang Forums   Mustang Classifieds   Photo Gallery   Calendars   Search   Live Chat   Contact MF   Sponsors
  Mustang Recalls   Mustang TSB's   News   Timeslips   Timeline   Wallpaper   Member List   Register   Login

RE: 351W vs 302 vs 289

  Printable Version
Mustang Forum >> Ford Mustang Tech >> Classic Mustangs >> RE: 351W vs 302 vs 289 Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: 351W vs 302 vs 289 - 5/15/2006 1:56:10 PM   
67Rally

 

Posts: 237
Joined: 5/5/2006
Status: offline
67Rally's photo gallery

quote:

ORIGINAL: myshifter

I think you guys who love the clevelands so much have little experience in the winsor arena. The Winsor is far superior. Like I said all we used to run were clevelands, including my father our drag racing experience with clevelands stretches 2 decades and we always got the best stuff that was used up from bob glidden in NHRA. 21st century racers with the big dollar would run the cleveland if there was an advantage, there isnt, thats all there is to it. They are extremely tempermental, take a ton of work to make the same power as winsors and have nowhere near the reliability. As to the cleveland market. Sorry but your prayers for a resurgence like an FE is not gonna happen. Regardless of australia. Let the cleveland rest already.



That is quite an assumption. You know what they say when you make an assumption.

Where did anyone say anything about racing Clevelands? We're talking about street. Going back to first Cleve entry, it was all about the street. Now, I'm not one for street racing...I leave that up to the 19-year-old idiots.

Cleveland lives.

_____________________________

1967 Coupe-front disc, rear drum, Shelby 10-spk rims
289 4V-Hol 1850, Ed Torker II, Erson Cam, Roller Rockers, dbl roller, MSD Pro Street dizzy- MSD 6AL - Blaster 2
Toploader-9" rear
frnt bench, dlx dash & overhead cons

(in reply to myshifter)
Post #: 41
RE: 351W vs 302 vs 289 - 5/15/2006 2:02:24 PM   
myshifter

 

Posts: 1364
Joined: 5/9/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: 67Rally


quote:

ORIGINAL: myshifter

I think you guys who love the clevelands so much have little experience in the winsor arena. The Winsor is far superior. Like I said all we used to run were clevelands, including my father our drag racing experience with clevelands stretches 2 decades and we always got the best stuff that was used up from bob glidden in NHRA. 21st century racers with the big dollar would run the cleveland if there was an advantage, there isnt, thats all there is to it. They are extremely tempermental, take a ton of work to make the same power as winsors and have nowhere near the reliability. As to the cleveland market. Sorry but your prayers for a resurgence like an FE is not gonna happen. Regardless of australia. Let the cleveland rest already.



That is quite an assumption. You know what they say when you make an assumption.

Where did anyone say anything about racing Clevelands? We're talking about street. Going back to first Cleve entry, it was all about the street. Now, I'm not one for street racing...I leave that up to the 19-year-old idiots.

Cleveland lives.
An assumption, most definately. But we all know anyone playing with clevelands are 99% older folks, older folks who are stuck in there ways as demonstrated by their love for dinosaur clevelands in this thread. Regardless I will concede, long live the cleveland

(in reply to 67Rally)
Post #: 42
RE: 351W vs 302 vs 289 - 5/15/2006 2:28:27 PM   
67Rally

 

Posts: 237
Joined: 5/5/2006
Status: offline
67Rally's photo gallery

quote:

ORIGINAL: myshifter

quote:

ORIGINAL: 67Rally


quote:

ORIGINAL: myshifter

I think you guys who love the clevelands so much have little experience in the winsor arena. The Winsor is far superior. Like I said all we used to run were clevelands, including my father our drag racing experience with clevelands stretches 2 decades and we always got the best stuff that was used up from bob glidden in NHRA. 21st century racers with the big dollar would run the cleveland if there was an advantage, there isnt, thats all there is to it. They are extremely tempermental, take a ton of work to make the same power as winsors and have nowhere near the reliability. As to the cleveland market. Sorry but your prayers for a resurgence like an FE is not gonna happen. Regardless of australia. Let the cleveland rest already.



That is quite an assumption. You know what they say when you make an assumption.

Where did anyone say anything about racing Clevelands? We're talking about street. Going back to first Cleve entry, it was all about the street. Now, I'm not one for street racing...I leave that up to the 19-year-old idiots.

Cleveland lives.
An assumption, most definately. But we all know anyone playing with clevelands are 99% older folks, older folks who are stuck in there ways as demonstrated by their love for dinosaur clevelands in this thread. Regardless I will concede, long live the cleveland


Younger guys (ok...so the guy is younger than the dinosaur) and Clevelands:



_____________________________

1967 Coupe-front disc, rear drum, Shelby 10-spk rims
289 4V-Hol 1850, Ed Torker II, Erson Cam, Roller Rockers, dbl roller, MSD Pro Street dizzy- MSD 6AL - Blaster 2
Toploader-9" rear
frnt bench, dlx dash & overhead cons

(in reply to myshifter)
Post #: 43
RE: 351W vs 302 vs 289 - 5/15/2006 2:39:24 PM   
myshifter

 

Posts: 1364
Joined: 5/9/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: 67Rally


quote:

ORIGINAL: myshifter

quote:

ORIGINAL: 67Rally


quote:

ORIGINAL: myshifter

I think you guys who love the clevelands so much have little experience in the winsor arena. The Winsor is far superior. Like I said all we used to run were clevelands, including my father our drag racing experience with clevelands stretches 2 decades and we always got the best stuff that was used up from bob glidden in NHRA. 21st century racers with the big dollar would run the cleveland if there was an advantage, there isnt, thats all there is to it. They are extremely tempermental, take a ton of work to make the same power as winsors and have nowhere near the reliability. As to the cleveland market. Sorry but your prayers for a resurgence like an FE is not gonna happen. Regardless of australia. Let the cleveland rest already.



That is quite an assumption. You know what they say when you make an assumption.

Where did anyone say anything about racing Clevelands? We're talking about street. Going back to first Cleve entry, it was all about the street. Now, I'm not one for street racing...I leave that up to the 19-year-old idiots.

Cleveland lives.
An assumption, most definately. But we all know anyone playing with clevelands are 99% older folks, older folks who are stuck in there ways as demonstrated by their love for dinosaur clevelands in this thread. Regardless I will concede, long live the cleveland


Younger guys (ok...so the guy is younger than the dinosaur) and Clevelands:


and I bet hes reading an article on a cleveland buildup lolllllllllllllllllll

(in reply to 67Rally)
Post #: 44
RE: 351W vs 302 vs 289 - 5/15/2006 4:18:43 PM   
6mustang6


Posts: 3594
Joined: 7/12/2004
Status: offline
6mustang6's photo gallery
quote:

take a ton of work to make the same power as winsors and have nowhere near the reliability.


please. A stock cleveland can eat a stock windsor for dinner. They are much more powerful already, so it WONT take alot of work to make the same power.

_____________________________


2000 GT Mustang Convertible

1966 Mustang coupe- all original, soon to be 4v swap.

1967 Mustang Conv- Freshly restored.



(in reply to myshifter)
Post #: 45
RE: 351W vs 302 vs 289 - 5/15/2006 4:30:44 PM   
Soaring



Posts: 17565
Joined: 10/29/2004
Status: offline
Soaring's photo gallery

quote:

ORIGINAL: 67Rally


quote:

ORIGINAL: myshifter

quote:

ORIGINAL: 67Rally


quote:

ORIGINAL: myshifter

I think you guys who love the clevelands so much have little experience in the winsor arena. The Winsor is far superior. Like I said all we used to run were clevelands, including my father our drag racing experience with clevelands stretches 2 decades and we always got the best stuff that was used up from bob glidden in NHRA. 21st century racers with the big dollar would run the cleveland if there was an advantage, there isnt, thats all there is to it. They are extremely tempermental, take a ton of work to make the same power as winsors and have nowhere near the reliability. As to the cleveland market. Sorry but your prayers for a resurgence like an FE is not gonna happen. Regardless of australia. Let the cleveland rest already.



That is quite an assumption. You know what they say when you make an assumption.

Where did anyone say anything about racing Clevelands? We're talking about street. Going back to first Cleve entry, it was all about the street. Now, I'm not one for street racing...I leave that up to the 19-year-old idiots.

Cleveland lives.
An assumption, most definately. But we all know anyone playing with clevelands are 99% older folks, older folks who are stuck in there ways as demonstrated by their love for dinosaur clevelands in this thread. Regardless I will concede, long live the cleveland


Younger guys (ok...so the guy is younger than the dinosaur) and Clevelands:



HEY! who took my picture? You guys arguing about clevors and W's are just spitting in the wind to convince each other. Me? I like my old stock C code 289. I can get a speeding ticket just as fast as anyone running a Clevor or a W.

(in reply to 67Rally)
Post #: 46
RE: 351W vs 302 vs 289 - 5/15/2006 4:36:01 PM   
usmcdevilmp

 

Posts: 143
Joined: 4/22/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: 67Rally


quote:

ORIGINAL: myshifter

quote:

ORIGINAL: 67Rally


quote:

ORIGINAL: myshifter

I think you guys who love the clevelands so much have little experience in the winsor arena. The Winsor is far superior. Like I said all we used to run were clevelands, including my father our drag racing experience with clevelands stretches 2 decades and we always got the best stuff that was used up from bob glidden in NHRA. 21st century racers with the big dollar would run the cleveland if there was an advantage, there isnt, thats all there is to it. They are extremely tempermental, take a ton of work to make the same power as winsors and have nowhere near the reliability. As to the cleveland market. Sorry but your prayers for a resurgence like an FE is not gonna happen. Regardless of australia. Let the cleveland rest already.



That is quite an assumption. You know what they say when you make an assumption.

Where did anyone say anything about racing Clevelands? We're talking about street. Going back to first Cleve entry, it was all about the street. Now, I'm not one for street racing...I leave that up to the 19-year-old idiots.

Cleveland lives.
An assumption, most definately. But we all know anyone playing with clevelands are 99% older folks, older folks who are stuck in there ways as demonstrated by their love for dinosaur clevelands in this thread. Regardless I will concede, long live the cleveland


Younger guys (ok...so the guy is younger than the dinosaur) and Clevelands:




Hey is that dinosoar located off of the 10 in so cal?

_____________________________

Semper Fi


(in reply to 67Rally)
Post #: 47
RE: 351W vs 302 vs 289 - 5/15/2006 11:46:40 PM   
NTIMID8

 

Posts: 68
Joined: 7/16/2003
From: United States
Status: offline
+2
The clevland can be made to run but they are by far not the best motor ever built. Sure the new clevland heads are down right awsome, but thats it. lol
quote:

ORIGINAL: myshifter

quote:

ORIGINAL: Baker

No mention of a 351C makes me sad, it is the best engine Ford ever produced.
Ya I wouldnt go that far, thats for sure. The 4V needs massive amounts of head work, they make no low end torque, you gotta spin them to 9k to make serious power, the blocks were casted horribly and core shift was a major factor and let's not touch on the oiling system. Other than that I loved spinning them up to 8500-9000.



_____________________________

"Happiness is being stroked and blown"

(in reply to myshifter)
Post #: 48
RE: 351W vs 302 vs 289 - 5/23/2006 6:17:04 PM   
WizardBlack

 

Posts: 144
Joined: 8/4/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: rmodel65

it where the block flexes all negines do it to a certain degree but thats what main girdles are for


Actually, IIRC, Core Shift is when the critical features of an engine block are not exactly located properly due to the casting core shifting when the block is made. From this, you can run into major problems trying to machine and blueprint a block to get everything where it should be and make big power. It has nothing to do with the engine flexing under major torque during operation. It has everything to do with the cylinders, mains, etc. not being precisely located where they are supposed to be.

(in reply to rmodel65)
Post #: 49
RE: 351W vs 302 vs 289 - 5/23/2006 6:59:02 PM   
THUMPIN455


Posts: 2505
Joined: 3/25/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: WizardBlack

quote:

ORIGINAL: rmodel65

it where the block flexes all negines do it to a certain degree but thats what main girdles are for


Actually, IIRC, Core Shift is when the critical features of an engine block are not exactly located properly due to the casting core shifting when the block is made. From this, you can run into major problems trying to machine and blueprint a block to get everything where it should be and make big power. It has nothing to do with the engine flexing under major torque during operation. It has everything to do with the cylinders, mains, etc. not being precisely located where they are supposed to be.


EXACTLY 100% RIGHT. Core shift causes problems when trying to bore cylinders or port heads. In either case if the sand mold wasnt in just the right place, and it was off by a few thousandths, you hit water, and while it is easy to take cast iron out, its INCREDIBLY difficult to put back in..

Me, I like the Cleveland. Bottom end issues arise when spinning them over 7500rpm, stay under 7k and you are usually pretty good, as long as its not a top end style car that runs at 6500 for a hundred miles or so. Why arent they used in some types of racing? Unfair advantage, only certain types of engines can be run in certain classes. In Stock and Super Stock they are factored at a much higher HP rating than a Windsor and most Chevys. Making them live isnt too tough, its just expensive because of the attention to detail it requires to run mega high RPM. Thats with any engine.

Lastly.. can we resize the pics before we post them? My screen is only 19" and having to scroll just to read is annoying.... :)

(in reply to WizardBlack)
Post #: 50
RE: 351W vs 302 vs 289 - 5/25/2006 4:29:26 PM   
mn5285

 

Posts: 29
Joined: 5/23/2006
Status: offline
Go whith the 351W its beter then the 302 im puting a 351W in my Mustang.

(in reply to want_66fastback)
Post #: 51
Login OR Register now to post a reply to this forum topic.
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3]

 

 
Mustang Forum >> Ford Mustang Tech >> Classic Mustangs
Jump to:
Forum Rules & FAQ
Today's Posts
Most Active Topics
RSS Feeds
Make A Donation

Mustangs:
Classic Mustang
Mustang II
Fox Body Mustang
sn95 Mustang
New Edge Mustang
s197 Mustang
Mustang Clubs
2007 GT500 Mustang
2009 Mustang
Ford Mustang Prices


Featured Sponsors
Advertising Info

Top 10 Posters
pro50sc17922
nanaki14685
88bluegt14536
dan04cobra14532
addermk214002
ride of the 13716
hotrods_n_bo13329
2000gt4.612516
mustangman0211994
1slo8511751

New Vendors
Extreme Dimension
BMR Fabrication
Year One
Auto Badges
Trickflow
Speedware Motorsports
LTM Global
Late Model Restoration
Southern Mustang Parts
BrandMotion

MustangForums.com is not affiliated with or endorsed by Ford Motor Company.