First you claim 12s in a stock GTO auto, you claim to have beaten an '03 Cobra from a roll. A car which dynos more, weighs less, and traps higher. You also stated a 2nd gear roll which is not strong for an auto goat. A 13.9 stock in 2v GT vert. You claimed a 2v GT with bolt ons will make 300+ whp with no cams or head work.
_____________________________
2005 Black GT Auto, SLP Loud Mouth exhaust, bassani on road x-pipe, Tunable Induction full CAI, Steeda charge motion plates, steeda ud pullies, 3:73s, SCT tuned by Brent Hughs Best E.T. 12.82@107.48
The 05 GTO's will run about 13.1 tops in a QM (stock). I have an LS2 in my Vette and on a good day (climate) excellent driving and everything 12.5 Qm (auto six speed). So for me to hear that a goat is running 12's is not entirely accurate unless he has a ton of mods.
Team MF Member #007 Posts: 9823
Joined: 1/5/2004 From: My moms uterus Status: offline
1.) Quit beating that horse. I'm not the only one thats done it. I've directed you to the GTO forum 1000X's. Just because your friend with the GTO can't do it doesn't mean it never happens.
2.) Who says 2nd gear is a weak point for a 4L65E? Especially against a T-56 thats geared ****ty? Which is why the 6-Speed LS1 guys that actually want to go fast swap to an automatic with a big stall. (You should probably do some research here) And I also stated that it happened once. And I didn't win by much. I've also stated that I've had my ass handed to me by a Cobra. So how far fetched is it?
3.) The 13.9 in the Convertible?? Yeah, thats hard to imagine. I already stated above it had a couple of BS things done to it. But you're telling me I'm the only one on the planet that has done that? I will say that I shift pretty God damn fast. Good day at the track? We're talking 2 tenths faster than what most others run with a decent driver?
4.) We were talking about a Dynojet. And I said that particular car would make 300 hp. Not 300+. He also had every bolt on known to man, along with a cut out and stock gearing. On a Mustang dyno, No. It won't put that down.
I fail to see how outrageous my claims are. You seem to talk to me like I'm some kid and this is my first V8. Which is exactly your story. Seems like this conversation should be the other way around.
Team MF Member #007 Posts: 9823
Joined: 1/5/2004 From: My moms uterus Status: offline
quote:
ORIGINAL: C6 VETTE
The 05 GTO's will run about 13.1 tops in a QM (stock). I have an LS2 in my Vette and on a good day (climate) excellent driving and everything 12.5 Qm (auto six speed). So for me to hear that a goat is running 12's is not entirely accurate unless he has a ton of mods.
Edit: You have an auto six speed? And again, you're talking about 2 tenths? WTF? You guys are some real sticklers. Never saw negative DA air, and a sticky track have you?
< Message edited by Sidewayz6.0 -- 5/18/2006 4:19:04 PM >
1.) Quit beating that horse. I'm not the only one thats done it. I've directed you to the GTO forum 1000X's. Just because your friend with the GTO can't do it doesn't mean it never happens.
2.) Who says 2nd gear is a weak point for a 4L65E? Especially against a T-56 thats geared ****ty? Which is why the 6-Speed LS1 guys that actually want to go fast swap to an automatic with a big stall. (You should probably do some research here) And I also stated that it happened once. And I didn't win by much. I've also stated that I've had my ass handed to me by a Cobra. So how far fetched is it?
3.) The 13.9 in the Convertible?? Yeah, thats hard to imagine. I already stated above it had a couple of BS things done to it. But you're telling me I'm the only one on the planet that has done that? I will say that I shift pretty God damn fast. Good day at the track? We're talking 2 tenths faster than what most others run with a decent driver?
4.) We were talking about a Dynojet. And I said that particular car would make 300 hp. Not 300+. He also had every bolt on known to man, along with a cut out and stock gearing. On a Mustang dyno, No. It won't put that down.
I fail to see how outrageous my claims are. You seem to talk to me like I'm some kid and this is my first V8. Which is exactly your story. Seems like this conversation should be the other way around.
I have no response. If you have convinced yourself of this than fine. I am done for now.
_____________________________
2005 Black GT Auto, SLP Loud Mouth exhaust, bassani on road x-pipe, Tunable Induction full CAI, Steeda charge motion plates, steeda ud pullies, 3:73s, SCT tuned by Brent Hughs Best E.T. 12.82@107.48
Team MF Member #007 Posts: 9823
Joined: 1/5/2004 From: My moms uterus Status: offline
How are those any different than a Dynojet number? All of the sudden MD Dyno's are the only thing that counts? Perhaps you should have specified what dyno you were talking about.
How are those any different than a Dynojet number? All of the sudden MD Dyno's are the only thing that counts? Perhaps you should have specified what dyno you were talking about.
Mustang dynos are not the only ones that correct. Dyno jets and dyno dynamics do it too. You are the only one that brags about uncorrected dyno numbers.
_____________________________
2005 Black GT Auto, SLP Loud Mouth exhaust, bassani on road x-pipe, Tunable Induction full CAI, Steeda charge motion plates, steeda ud pullies, 3:73s, SCT tuned by Brent Hughs Best E.T. 12.82@107.48
Team MF Member #007 Posts: 9823
Joined: 1/5/2004 From: My moms uterus Status: offline
Thats not true at all. I didn't brag at all. You said they dyno a certain number. I said my did something otherwise. Perhaps you should have specified.
Thats not true at all. I didn't brag at all. You said they dyno a certain number. I said my did something otherwise. Perhaps you should have specified.
Like I said, you use uncorrected numbers. Everyone else uses corrected.
_____________________________
2005 Black GT Auto, SLP Loud Mouth exhaust, bassani on road x-pipe, Tunable Induction full CAI, Steeda charge motion plates, steeda ud pullies, 3:73s, SCT tuned by Brent Hughs Best E.T. 12.82@107.48
Team MF Member #007 Posts: 9823
Joined: 1/5/2004 From: My moms uterus Status: offline
quote:
ORIGINAL: 757GT
quote:
ORIGINAL: Sidewayz6.0
Thats not true at all. I didn't brag at all. You said they dyno a certain number. I said my did something otherwise. Perhaps you should have specified.
Like I said, you use uncorrected numbers. Everyone else uses corrected.
In your own little world everyone uses corrected numbers. Not that dyno numbers mean a damn thing anyway. Your theory fails here. Most people post MAX HP numbers. i.e. Uncorrected.
with a stock gto? auto @ that there's no way..... im sorry its no WAY in HEll it put that down stock...... so im pretty sure your version of a stock car as you already mentioned (your gt) had a short throw shifter, cai, and a Mac Catback and it ran 13.9s?? I guess all your cars all factory freaks'
Thats not true at all. I didn't brag at all. You said they dyno a certain number. I said my did something otherwise. Perhaps you should have specified.
Like I said, you use uncorrected numbers. Everyone else uses corrected.
In your own little world everyone uses corrected numbers. Not that dyno numbers mean a damn thing anyway. Your theory fails here. Most people post MAX HP numbers. i.e. Uncorrected.
Most dynos automatically correct and you post you peak corrected hp. Like I said show me where everyone else is posting uncorrected dyno numbers.
_____________________________
2005 Black GT Auto, SLP Loud Mouth exhaust, bassani on road x-pipe, Tunable Induction full CAI, Steeda charge motion plates, steeda ud pullies, 3:73s, SCT tuned by Brent Hughs Best E.T. 12.82@107.48
All my numbers were just straight off the screen. Last dyno was in 95+ degree heat and after a 30 mile drive to Charlotte, then straight on the dyno. They're not corrected at all. I've never seen anyone correct dyno numbers....maybe I live in my own world, IDK.