Nobody's putting the SN95 OWNERS down, they're stating facts... the SN95 Mustangs were one of THE slowest Mustangs ever built. If you're really getting pissed off about THAT you reaaaaaaaaally need to stop with calling me 'childish'.
Posts: 5661
Joined: 3/15/2004 From: VA Status: offline
quote:
ORIGINAL: STAMPEDE
quote:
ORIGINAL: Grn N Gry 5OH
quote:
ORIGINAL: STAMPEDE
No, you didn't just call a 97 GT slow ..... you put down a fellow members ride because he stated an opinion you didn't like. You acted like a prick and your contining to do so.
really, this happens EVERYDAY. look at all the 'Maro vs 'Stang threads. and it is sort of a fact.....the non-pi 4.6's, SUCK...for lack of a better word.
This coming from a moderator. Putting down all the members with 96 - 98 GT's. Real nice guys ! Just goes to show this forum would put down every 96-98 mustang owner just to back a honda driver who posted something arrogant and stupid.
stock, yeah. with the pi swap, no. i have friends with non-pi headed 'Stangs and theyll tell u the exact same thing. ive raced 'em. i either beat 'em, or hang with 'em. ITS A FACT.
_____________________________
"it aint braggin mother f**ker if you back it up"
'92 GT-bbk shorties, bbk o/r h-pipe, 2.5" flowmaster 2-chambers, Pro 5.0 shifter, march underdrives
Nobody's putting the SN95 OWNERS down, they're stating facts... the SN95 Mustangs were one of THE slowest Mustangs ever built. If you're really getting pissed off about THAT you reaaaaaaaaally need to stop with calling me 'childish'.
I know the 96-98's sucked. But that had nothing to do with the original post !!!! And I will stop calling you childish if you quit posting like one.... lol PS I drive a 94 ........ fyi
< Message edited by STAMPEDE -- 5/3/2006 11:23:50 PM >
RE: Gonna run a 3000gt vr4. - 5/3/2006 11:24:45 PM
Guest
quote:
ORIGINAL: STAMPEDE
quote:
ORIGINAL: 2000Si
Nobody's putting the SN95 OWNERS down, they're stating facts... the SN95 Mustangs were one of THE slowest Mustangs ever built. If you're really getting pissed off about THAT you reaaaaaaaaally need to stop with calling me 'childish'.
I know the 96-98's sucked. But that had nothing to do with the original post !!!! And I will stop calling you childish if you quit posting like one.... lol PS I drive a 94 ........ fyi
LOL... Ok... seriously, what part of my opinion is not correlated by this post?
The "overrated" 3000GT upon which he downplays and obviously insults in a condescending manner would most likely, with not even a seasoned driver, absolutely hammer him in his bolt on 97 GT.
Sorry, I'm as big of Mustang enthusiast as the next person but I'm gonna have to agree with this statement.
Nobody's putting the SN95 OWNERS down, they're stating facts... the SN95 Mustangs were one of THE slowest Mustangs ever built. If you're really getting pissed off about THAT you reaaaaaaaaally need to stop with calling me 'childish'.
I know the 96-98's sucked. But that had nothing to do with the original post !!!! And I will stop calling you childish if you quit posting like one.... lol PS I drive a 94 ........ fyi
LOL... Ok... seriously, what part of my opinion is not correlated by this post?
Quit using big words ..... lol ........ I agree with your info ....... I don't agree with the way you put it to another member.
Well I leve and all this happens Well looks like the non PI GT owners are more sensitive than us V6 owners
v6's SUCK. what? yeah i said it. yeah i own*ed* one. dyou whunnuh foight aboot eet? sensitive that! hey, at least i beat a stock auto honda civic in it. once.
_____________________________
05 gt: 12.54 @ 324rwhp/337rwtq Goodies on the way.
PR Manager for Automotive Dezignz MECP Installer and Mobile Product Specialist Mechanical/Manufacturing Engineer.
Wow, I didn't know I was going to start all this...
I actually have no bolt ons, all the parts I have are sitting on my floor waiting for installation.
I dislike my car, I know it's slow, you don't have to tell me that. I bought what I could afford and have bought parts with money I earned in Iraq, but don't have the money yet to put them on. Sorry
All I was saying was, in my opinion, vr-4s are over rated because all the ricer kids talk about how they are so fast and they can beat all these cars, blah blah blah. I am just not impressed with them for all the hype they get. I thought I could make a comment, sorry.
_____________________________
97 GT auto
Sitting on my floor to be install BBK Shorties o/r x pipe Flowmasters S/C with all the fixens
Stationed in Camp Pendleton, CA for now, but always reppin' Tampa
Wow, I didn't know I was going to start all this...
I actually have no bolt ons, all the parts I have are sitting on my floor waiting for installation.
I dislike my car, I know it's slow, you don't have to tell me that. I bought what I could afford and have bought parts with money I earned in Iraq, but don't have the money yet to put them on. Sorry
All I was saying was, in my opinion, vr-4s are over rated because all the ricer kids talk about how they are so fast and they can beat all these cars, blah blah blah. I am just not impressed with them for all the hype they get. I thought I could make a comment, sorry.
No, this argument is more over one member drinking and the other one being bored...lol It has very little to do with your car. Why do you hate your car ??? It could be worse, you could be driving a honda ....lol .... Sorry :) ......j/k !
< Message edited by STAMPEDE -- 5/4/2006 12:20:49 AM >
pfft. I think u guys are just bored. So is the vr4 overrated or not (and IMO, i could pedal a bike to work and still think a car is over rated in the sense that the company says one thing and the car gives another....) i looked them up awhile back and i thought they were sposed to run mid 13s... where are these cars actually running?
just looked them up. 320 hp, and 315 ft lbs (not 215 according to KBB). thats pretty mean. did i miss something in this guys sig, doesnt he just have a bolt on PI? and hes got a vert (weight difference slims) racing against a 6 speed. that car must be seriously over rated or i think hes in trouble....
< Message edited by SpecterGT260 -- 5/4/2006 12:36:41 AM >
First off, I just want to say that I'm not upset, and not trying to start anything. This is not a "debate" unless you want it to be. But I have to speak my peace (debate then? )
quote:
Childish? HA... see this is where you are incorrect. The "overrated" 3000GT upon which he downplays and obviously insults in a condescending manner would most likely, with not even a seasoned driver, absolutely hammer him in his bolt on 97 GT.
You're doing it again here. You are trying to correlate his OPINION (people are entitled to these) or even knowledge on a matter based on what he drives. Example, I could drive a geo, and be the world's foremost expert on Ferrari's (however unlikely) because I drive a Geo, I don't know ****?
quote:
He drives quite possibly one of the slowest production Mustangs EVER built (sorry guys, not trying to insult - just making a factual rebuttal).
You do it yet again, and I don't know how it made any kind of a rebuttal, since all you did was reinforce my point.
quote:
Now, the reason I commented on his waaaaaaaaaaaaaaas... (ready for this?) my car wasn't built for speed & I don't talk down about imports/any other car when I know nothing about them. It really had no relevance to the topic and pretty much just revealed his ignorance on the topic at hand.
I know your car wasn't built for speed, that's exactly my point. You know a healthy amount of stuff about cars, so why should I judge your opinion because you drive/drove a honda? (I honestly don't know what you own, but that isn't the point) I don't think he had divulged enough information period for you to have even made any assumption that he knew nothing about them. It was sort of on topic, we were pitting these two cars against each other, and he put his opinion out there about the vr4. (Which I have plenty of respect for, and knowledge about) My friends have owned all kinds of cars in that class (3000GT sl, Vr4, 300zx na, 300zx tt) and I like them
quote:
But, anyway the arrogance continues in the fact that you are now trying to debate me off the topic.
So because I questioned you ripping on a fellow MF'er, that makes me arrogant? I have said nothing arrogant.
quote:
haha Nice! I appreciate the extreme amount of overflowing irony within these two sentences. However, you do not know me and I do not 'roll in' ANY Honda crowd.
I don't see the irony in this sentence, forgive me. You knew exactly what I was trying to say, you cannot tell me that you haven't frequented Honda forums, or forums dominated by them or similar imports either now or in the past. Sorry you don't "roll" in them now, but you should get the point.
Given all this, I was just defending someone on here, who got personally ripped after stating an opinion in one post; that did not deserve it. All I was doing was sticking up for the guy. So don't get upset that I called you out on this, the forum is supposed to be friendly, and that's what I was trying to protect.
P.S.- Float me one of those beers
_____________________________
87 Mustang Vert Bolt ons, full exhaust, 3.73s. Pro Kit, Tokico HP's, Strut brace, LCAs. 100 wet shot of nitrous waiting to be installed...
Printable Version
RE: Gonna run a 3000gt vr4. - 
Well looks like the non PI GT owners are more sensitive than us V6 owners
) 
