Honestly, Ford could have done better. It looks like the new GT body style 99+ and a really old one slapped together, I don't relaly like it. But hey, we can learn to love it for the performance right?
__________________
~God made man before women because you always make a rough draft before the final masterpiece~
Guys!! you gotta be kidding . that car looks nice just the color and rims dont make it shine . I dislike the looks of sn 95 up to 2003 models it looks like a probe gt. This car has endless upgrade possiblilties , hood scoops rear wings , Body kits . maybe cause i own a 1969 fast back and this really brings back yesterday body type but trust me this car will grow on ya .
__________________
93 Coupe,DSS 331/N-91 Cam/AFR185 heads/Vic Jr intake/Mac 1 3/4 Longtubes/Dr Gas X pipe/Spin tech mufflers/430 gears/T-5 Trans for now.
But hey, we can learn to love it for the performance right?
[sm=smiley36.gif] Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight!
?
Only slightly heavyer, 300 HP stock? Whats not to like?
Basically give the car a set of 3.73s, and a slight diet (spare tire etc) and it should feel like what mine feels like now, or pretty close (not sure about the TQ).
If it does, thats definatly something to look forward to. My car, while not the fastest out there, eats stock GTs for breakfast. Absolutly no comparason.
You must be joking man. 300 HP is nothing.
The car looks alright but those rims didn't match the color. It will take some time for me and others to like it.
Quote:
My car, while not the fastest out there, eats stock GTs for breakfast. Absolutly no comparason.
NO ****?
2000 Mustang GT- C&L MAM/True flow inlet pipe with K&N, BBK 70mm T/B, and C&L upper plenum. BBK LT Headers, BBK o/r X pipe, Flowmasters, Mcleod clutch Diablo chip, 3.73s V. Stock???? hmmmm i wonder who's gonna get owned.....
This car is rated bascially the exact same as the '04 and prior GT's. It's not like it's gonna be as fast as the Mach 1 or anything. It's a heavier GT with slightly more hp.