Mustang Forums   Mustang Classifieds   Photo Gallery   Calendars   Search   Live Chat   Contact MF   Sponsors
  Mustang Recalls   Mustang TSB's   News   Timeslips   Timeline   Wallpaper   Member List   Register   Login

1997 camaro SS vs 2006 Mustang GT

  Printable Version
Mustang Forums >> Ford Mustang Tech >> 2005 - 2008 Mustangs >> 4.6L V8 Specific >> 1997 camaro SS vs 2006 Mustang GT Page: [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
1997 camaro SS vs 2006 Mustang GT - 4/27/2006 4:24:21 PM   
Stable

 

Posts: 4
Joined: 4/18/2006
Status: offline
Who would win between the two a brand new mustang gt 2006 vs a 1997 camaro ss with automatic and teh gt is a manual transmission both are stock. Who would win in an all out drag race.
Post #: 1
RE: 1997 camaro SS vs 2006 Mustang GT - 4/27/2006 4:26:50 PM   
mustangman02232


Posts: 11994
Joined: 12/22/2004
From: Ludlow, Mass
Status: offline
mustangman02232's photo gallery
97 maro is an LT1, so you will win, if it was an LS1 he would have you, however if you screw up he will have you, and the 4L60-E auto tranny in the maro is just as fast if not faster then a 6 speed

_____________________________

91 f350 7.3 IDI
02 v6 auto: SOLD and on a mission to buy her back
15.801 @ 88.99 mph, 2.4 60, LTs, cat H force pros
http://s106.photobucket.com/albums/m244/mustangman02232/?action=view¤t=HPIM0571.flv

(in reply to Stable)
Post #: 2
RE: 1997 camaro SS vs 2006 Mustang GT - 4/27/2006 4:45:55 PM   
bobby1110


Posts: 241
Joined: 3/28/2006
From: stanley nc
Status: offline
i have the 06 gt with the diablo and 3.73's and i pulled my friend with his 01 trans am. he is automatic but he has a diablo, shift kit, 3.55's, intake, cat back exhaust, shorty headers, no cats, and a 315/45/r17 bfg drag radials. we went from a roll he got me the firs time (late reaction) but the next time we hit it at the same i pulled him from first to third gear. at the end of the race i was out in fron by about !/2 a car. he was supprised. he must weigh alot because he made 330hp and 321trq on the dyno. but one thing he has over me is nitrous he sprays a 125 shot of nitrous, but he didnt spray on me it was just motor aginst motor.

(in reply to mustangman02232)
Post #: 3
RE: 1997 camaro SS vs 2006 Mustang GT - 4/27/2006 5:27:31 PM   
Sleeper05



Posts: 3598
Joined: 3/14/2006
Status: offline
the gt should easily pull away, assuming a good driver mod in in place
the situation would reverse if it were a 98 SS, which usually run 13.2-13.6 stock, while our gt would run about half a second slower stock

_____________________________

05 gt:
12.54 @ 324rwhp/337rwtq
Goodies on the way.

PR Manager for Automotive Dezignz
MECP Installer and Mobile Product Specialist
Mechanical/Manufacturing Engineer.

(in reply to bobby1110)
Post #: 4
RE: 1997 camaro SS vs 2006 Mustang GT - 4/27/2006 7:07:47 PM   
averyr18

 

Posts: 100
Joined: 4/21/2006
Status: offline

Vs the LT1 camaro SS which only has cosmetic modifications over the base z28 it would be your race to lose. Later on in the years Chevy gave the camaro a detuned version of the LS1 with 335hp. A manual shift or 4L60E auto would take the cake on a stock 05 GT

(in reply to Sleeper05)
Post #: 5
RE: 1997 camaro SS vs 2006 Mustang GT - 4/27/2006 7:09:12 PM   
Stoenr


Posts: 3481
Joined: 5/21/2005
From: S.burbs Chicago
Status: offline
Ill get my chance against my step dads 97 next month. Although not an SS, but 30th anniv Ed. Hes having a family trophy made for the winner, lol
Let us know how yours goes! And Ill be sure to take a picture of my trophy



_____________________________

WWW.06GT.COM

12.83_107.15

(in reply to Sleeper05)
Post #: 6
RE: 1997 camaro SS vs 2006 Mustang GT - 4/27/2006 7:13:15 PM   
757GT

 

Posts: 2435
Joined: 5/5/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: averyr18


Vs the LT1 camaro SS which only has cosmetic modifications over the base z28 it would be your race to lose. Later on in the years Chevy gave the camaro a detuned version of the LS1 with 335hp. A manual shift or 4L60E auto would take the cake on a stock 05 GT


I dont ever remember a Camaro rated at 335 HP. You wanna show everybody where you found this. The only thing you have correct is that a LS1 car will beat a new Mustang stock for stock.

Anyways you will beat the LT1 Camaro.

_____________________________

2005 Black GT Auto, SLP Loud Mouth exhaust, bassani on road x-pipe, Tunable Induction full CAI, Steeda charge motion plates, steeda ud pullies, 3:73s, SCT tuned by Brent Hughs
Best E.T. 12.82@107.48

(in reply to averyr18)
Post #: 7
RE: 1997 camaro SS vs 2006 Mustang GT - 4/27/2006 7:18:03 PM   
averyr18

 

Posts: 100
Joined: 4/21/2006
Status: offline

I stand corrected, the newer camaro SS's carry a 325hp LS1 motor and 340lbs of torque.

You can check the overview of the car here,

http://www.epinions.com/auto-review-785B-456703C2-3A4BB91F-prod3

(in reply to 757GT)
Post #: 8
RE: 1997 camaro SS vs 2006 Mustang GT - 4/27/2006 7:20:15 PM   
757GT

 

Posts: 2435
Joined: 5/5/2004
Status: offline
.
quote:

ORIGINAL: averyr18


I stand corrected, the newer camaro SS's carry a 325hp LS1 motor and 340lbs of torque.

You can check the overview of the car here,

http://www.epinions.com/auto-review-785B-456703C2-3A4BB91F-prod3


See, you were wrong, 325 is the correct answer. You should know that being a GM guy

_____________________________

2005 Black GT Auto, SLP Loud Mouth exhaust, bassani on road x-pipe, Tunable Induction full CAI, Steeda charge motion plates, steeda ud pullies, 3:73s, SCT tuned by Brent Hughs
Best E.T. 12.82@107.48

(in reply to averyr18)
Post #: 9
RE: 1997 camaro SS vs 2006 Mustang GT - 4/27/2006 7:21:26 PM   
Hufenstang

 

Posts: 551
Joined: 12/26/2005
Status: offline
either way isnt that 325hp pretty under-rated?

(in reply to averyr18)
Post #: 10
RE: 1997 camaro SS vs 2006 Mustang GT - 4/27/2006 7:22:56 PM   
Cruehead


Posts: 120
Joined: 8/16/2005
Status: offline
My friend has a 1999 Camaro SS (LS1), and I beat him by about a qtr panel. He's only done exhaust and CAI, though...so he's basically stock.

_____________________________

Dave
'07 redfire GT
Flowmasters

'94 GT Vert
***BONE STOCK***

(in reply to averyr18)
Post #: 11
RE: 1997 camaro SS vs 2006 Mustang GT - 4/27/2006 7:25:10 PM   
757GT

 

Posts: 2435
Joined: 5/5/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hufenstang

either way isnt that 325hp pretty under-rated?


Yes, 01 and 02 LS1 M6s usually dyno 310 and the autos 300. In 01 the LS1 F-bodies got the LS6 intake manifold which is where the extra power came from. Those year F-bodies are very underrated.

_____________________________

2005 Black GT Auto, SLP Loud Mouth exhaust, bassani on road x-pipe, Tunable Induction full CAI, Steeda charge motion plates, steeda ud pullies, 3:73s, SCT tuned by Brent Hughs
Best E.T. 12.82@107.48

(in reply to Hufenstang)
Post #: 12
RE: 1997 camaro SS vs 2006 Mustang GT - 4/27/2006 7:29:32 PM   
averyr18

 

Posts: 100
Joined: 4/21/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: 757GT

.
quote:

ORIGINAL: averyr18


I stand corrected, the newer camaro SS's carry a 325hp LS1 motor and 340lbs of torque.

You can check the overview of the car here,

http://www.epinions.com/auto-review-785B-456703C2-3A4BB91F-prod3


See, you were wrong, 325 is the correct answer. You should know that being a GM guy


How old are you again? I admitted the I was wrong. I can't remeber every Gm cars horsepower off thought. I thought it was 335 but it was a much much lower 325. Your right, I should have known. I am more familiar with the competitions numbers anyways.

< Message edited by averyr18 -- 4/27/2006 7:32:29 PM >

(in reply to 757GT)
Post #: 13
RE: 1997 camaro SS vs 2006 Mustang GT - 4/27/2006 7:31:48 PM   
averyr18

 

Posts: 100
Joined: 4/21/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: 757GT


quote:

ORIGINAL: Hufenstang

either way isnt that 325hp pretty under-rated?


Yes, 01 and 02 LS1 M6s usually dyno 310 and the autos 300. In 01 the LS1 F-bodies got the LS6 intake manifold which is where the extra power came from. Those year F-bodies are very underrated.



(in reply to 757GT)
Post #: 14
RE: 1997 camaro SS vs 2006 Mustang GT - 4/27/2006 7:32:35 PM   
757GT

 

Posts: 2435
Joined: 5/5/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: averyr18


quote:

ORIGINAL: 757GT

.
quote:

ORIGINAL: averyr18


I stand corrected, the newer camaro SS's carry a 325hp LS1 motor and 340lbs of torque.

You can check the overview of the car here,

http://www.epinions.com/auto-review-785B-456703C2-3A4BB91F-prod3


See, you were wrong, 325 is the correct answer. You should know that being a GM guy


How old are you again? I admitted the I was wrong. I can't remeber every Gm cars horsepower off thought. I thought it was 335 but it was a much much lower 325. Your I should have known. I am more familiar with the competitions numbers anyways.


Why you wanna know how old I am? Are you trying to hit on me or something? Sorry bud, don't float that way. Hope this doesn't crush you.

_____________________________

2005 Black GT Auto, SLP Loud Mouth exhaust, bassani on road x-pipe, Tunable Induction full CAI, Steeda charge motion plates, steeda ud pullies, 3:73s, SCT tuned by Brent Hughs
Best E.T. 12.82@107.48

(in reply to averyr18)
Post #: 15
RE: 1997 camaro SS vs 2006 Mustang GT - 4/27/2006 7:35:04 PM   
Hufenstang

 

Posts: 551
Joined: 12/26/2005
Status: offline
this guy here at my apt building has a 01 ss i believe nothign done to it except long tube headers.. any idea or guesses on what kind of rwhp hes pushing? trying to figure out if i can take him or not o_O

(in reply to 757GT)
Post #: 16
RE: 1997 camaro SS vs 2006 Mustang GT - 4/27/2006 7:36:40 PM   
757GT

 

Posts: 2435
Joined: 5/5/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hufenstang

this guy here at my apt building has a 01 ss i believe nothign done to it except long tube headers.. any idea or guesses on what kind of rwhp hes pushing? trying to figure out if i can take him or not o_O


Auto I would say 320, manual, I would say 335. He can easily run high 12s either way.

_____________________________

2005 Black GT Auto, SLP Loud Mouth exhaust, bassani on road x-pipe, Tunable Induction full CAI, Steeda charge motion plates, steeda ud pullies, 3:73s, SCT tuned by Brent Hughs
Best E.T. 12.82@107.48

(in reply to Hufenstang)
Post #: 17
RE: 1997 camaro SS vs 2006 Mustang GT - 4/27/2006 7:37:35 PM   
averyr18

 

Posts: 100
Joined: 4/21/2006
Status: offline

No less than 300RWHP.

(in reply to Hufenstang)
Post #: 18
RE: 1997 camaro SS vs 2006 Mustang GT - 4/27/2006 7:40:52 PM   
averyr18

 

Posts: 100
Joined: 4/21/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: 757GT


quote:

ORIGINAL: averyr18


quote:

ORIGINAL: 757GT

.
quote:

ORIGINAL: averyr18


I stand corrected, the newer camaro SS's carry a 325hp LS1 motor and 340lbs of torque.

You can check the overview of the car here,

http://www.epinions.com/auto-review-785B-456703C2-3A4BB91F-prod3


See, you were wrong, 325 is the correct answer. You should know that being a GM guy


How old are you again? I admitted the I was wrong. I can't remeber every Gm cars horsepower off thought. I thought it was 335 but it was a much much lower 325. Your I should have known. I am more familiar with the competitions numbers anyways.


Why you wanna know how old I am? Are you trying to hit on me or something? Sorry bud, don't float that way. Hope this doesn't crush you.


You went to the sexual side of things buddy not me. Don't flatter yourself. I was wondering because you sound so immature. Good luck finding a life partner in these threads.

(in reply to 757GT)
Post #: 19
RE: 1997 camaro SS vs 2006 Mustang GT - 4/27/2006 7:44:31 PM   
757GT

 

Posts: 2435
Joined: 5/5/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: averyr18


quote:

ORIGINAL: 757GT


quote:

ORIGINAL: averyr18


quote:

ORIGINAL: 757GT

.
quote:

ORIGINAL: averyr18


I stand corrected, the newer camaro SS's carry a 325hp LS1 motor and 340lbs of torque.

You can check the overview of the car here,

http://www.epinions.com/auto-review-785B-456703C2-3A4BB91F-prod3


See, you were wrong, 325 is the correct answer. You should know that being a GM guy


How old are you again? I admitted the I was wrong. I can't remeber every Gm cars horsepower off thought. I thought it was 335 but it was a much much lower 325. Your I should have known. I am more familiar with the competitions numbers anyways.


Why you wanna know how old I am? Are you trying to hit on me or something? Sorry bud, don't float that way. Hope this doesn't crush you.


You went to the sexual side of things buddy not me. Don't flatter yourself. I was wondering because you sound so immature. Good luck finding a life partner in these threads.



You don't flame very well, that is the best you can do. You are not even entertaining to me anymore.

_____________________________

2005 Black GT Auto, SLP Loud Mouth exhaust, bassani on road x-pipe, Tunable Induction full CAI, Steeda charge motion plates, steeda ud pullies, 3:73s, SCT tuned by Brent Hughs
Best E.T. 12.82@107.48

(in reply to averyr18)
Post #: 20
Login OR Register now to post a reply to this forum topic.
Page:   [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>

 

 
Mustang Forums >> Ford Mustang Tech >> 2005 - 2008 Mustangs >> 4.6L V8 Specific
Jump to:
Forum Rules & FAQ
Today's Posts
Most Active Topics
RSS Feeds
Make A Donation

Mustangs:
Classic Mustang
Mustang II
Fox Body Mustang
sn95 Mustang
New Edge Mustang
s197 Mustang
Mustang Clubs
2007 GT500 Mustang
2009 Mustang
Ford Mustang Prices


Featured Sponsors
Advertising Info

Top 10 Posters
pro50sc17922
nanaki14685
88bluegt14536
dan04cobra14532
addermk214002
ride of the 13716
hotrods_n_bo13329
2000gt4.612516
mustangman0211994
1slo8511751

New Vendors
Extreme Dimension
BMR Fabrication
Year One
Auto Badges
Trickflow
Speedware Motorsports
LTM Global
Late Model Restoration
Southern Mustang Parts
BrandMotion

MustangForums.com is not affiliated with or endorsed by Ford Motor Company.