RE: stock camaro vs stock mustang
| Mustang Forums Sponsor |
|
|
|
Visit Royal Purple For More! |
|
|
|
Login  | |
|
|
|
|
|
RE: stock camaro vs stock mustang - 4/18/2006 3:51:48 AM
|
|
|
NeoTokyo
Posts: 2517
Joined: 12/2/2003
From: Sacramento, CA
Status: offline
|
72MachOne99GT I was talkin normal, I just talk like that. Internet lacks facial expressions.
btw, got a cleveland in that mach? My wife has a 71' M Code 4V cleveland. The engine is getting rebuilt right now. In 71 the had the M code that had 285hp and the Q code that had 280hp (Cobra Jet) though it was 5hp less it had a ton more torque, but I dont remember either torque specs and the one I wish we had would be the rare R code 330hp 4V Cleveland. Though her original build information online says its the 330hp option but doesnt mention the R code, eh I dunno, all I know is that the engine will be awesome when its done.
_____________________________
95' Mustang Mach 1 281 manual - Penny -
Slightly Modded 4.6L / 5.3L ModStroker
RAM King Cobra Super Duty Clutch
White Ext. Charcoal Mach 1 Int.
Mach1 Shaker, badging/Clone
18"x10.5" Y2K Cobra R's
96' Mustang 00' Swap - NoName -
|
|
|
|
|
RE: stock camaro vs stock mustang - 4/18/2006 10:44:25 AM
|
|
|
72MachOne99GT
Posts: 5169
Joined: 12/17/2004
From: Eskimo Village, Indiana *No Igloo*
Status: offline
|
It's got the Q Code, which in '72 was the more powerful of the two (cause it was the 4 barrel)
only 266 hp and 301 lb/ft tq
there were some R codes left over in '72 that made something in the 275 range, but like you said, lacked some torque
what color is yours? and is it an auto?
my dads is in alright shape, if it was gonna be a professional rebuild, it would take ALOT ALOT of work, but as it is, we just want it to run strong, (and it looks A++ from abuot 10 feet away)
up close its got a couple spots that arent perfect, but there is no surface rust (just a tad in the floor and we refabricated the trunk pan)
_____________________________
1200 Miles on replacement Head.
We need a live chat back again. I'll be a moderator.
13.879@100.86 w/ 2.02 60'
In need of driver mod/cool weather.
|
|
|
|
|
RE: stock camaro vs stock mustang - 4/19/2006 9:52:01 PM
|
|
|
NeoTokyo
Posts: 2517
Joined: 12/2/2003
From: Sacramento, CA
Status: offline
|
Its flamingo Grey with vermilion red interior. Its an Auto but the rear seat doesnt fold down.
The floor pans are completly shot in the car but the body is beautiful, the paint has no clear on it though.
Its a shell ready for The works, it was complete but I tore it down and we are starting the long process.
We wanted to put a TKO600 in it behind the cleveland and rebuild the baby C6 for later.
Welp I better be off, have fun with that car and dont sell her, they are becoming very popular.
_____________________________
95' Mustang Mach 1 281 manual - Penny -
Slightly Modded 4.6L / 5.3L ModStroker
RAM King Cobra Super Duty Clutch
White Ext. Charcoal Mach 1 Int.
Mach1 Shaker, badging/Clone
18"x10.5" Y2K Cobra R's
96' Mustang 00' Swap - NoName -
|
|
|
|
|
RE: stock camaro vs stock mustang - 4/19/2006 9:54:03 PM
|
|
|
72MachOne99GT
Posts: 5169
Joined: 12/17/2004
From: Eskimo Village, Indiana *No Igloo*
Status: offline
|
quote:
Welp I better be off, have fun with that car and dont sell her, they are becoming very popular.
that's one of the reasons my dad wanted it so badly
his sister had a 71 or 72 when they were younger and she was gonna sell it after it'd been stolen and fixed up, but he didnt think it'd be a very good choice being 20 and going into the air force
so now he's just working on making this one a nice summer car for weekends and some drive in cruises and what not
good luck
_____________________________
1200 Miles on replacement Head.
We need a live chat back again. I'll be a moderator.
13.879@100.86 w/ 2.02 60'
In need of driver mod/cool weather.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RE: stock camaro vs stock mustang - 4/22/2006 5:59:27 PM
|
|
|
b_hollier
Posts: 200
Joined: 4/22/2006
Status: offline
|
I have owned the 97 firebird, 99 camaro, and the 97 vette in the past. I can say that the mustang GT cannot compete with any of them. The Cobra that came out in 2003 can however out perform almost everything that GM has on the market. I have seen the 2004 Cobra run against the 2004 ZO6 and the Cobra did come out first. Could have been a bad driver in the vette, but a win is a win. The 2005 and up GT's are faster that the Z28's and run head to head with the SS. They are very close to the older C5 vette. Not much slower, a few mods and they are an even race. I am still wating to see what the new Shelby will do against the C6 ZO6. I have driven the new ZO6 and am very doubtful that the Shelby can out run it. As far as camaro and mustang competion goes, you need the newer Cobra to out run them.
|
|
|
|
|
RE: stock camaro vs stock mustang - 5/1/2007 1:04:33 PM
|
|
|
07TungStang
Posts: 15
Joined: 2/18/2007
Status: offline
|
we can try it out right now...i have the 2 enemies in the garage now a 2000 camaro 3.8 and a 2007 mustang 4.0....somebody can drive the maro while i drive the stang...
|
|
|
|
|
RE: stock camaro vs stock mustang - 5/1/2007 2:03:37 PM
|
|
|
Dath
Posts: 383
Joined: 5/29/2006
Status: offline
|
Crank horsepower is a tough way to determine whats faster. I have the 0-60 (first number) and 1/4 mile times (second number) for a few mustangs and camaros. Not a complete list, but they are all bone stock.
quote:
1964 Ford Mustang (289ci V8 w/4spd) 7.5 15.7
1966 Ford Mustang (289ci V8 Auto) 10.9 17.9
1967 Ford Mustang (390ci V8 w/4spd) 7.4 15.6
1967 Chevrolet Camaro SS-350 8.0 15.4
1969 Ford Mustang Mach 1 5.7 13.9
1969 Ford Mustang Mach 1 428ci 5.7 14.3
1969 Chevrolet Camaro ZL-1 5.3 11.68
1970 Ford Mustang Boss 302 6.5 14.9
1971 Ford Mustang Boss 351 5.8 13.8
1971 Ford Mustang (351ci V8 w/4spd) 5.8 13.8
1972 Chevrolet Camaro Budget GT 10.5 17.6
1972 Chevrolet Camaro Luxury GT 9.8 17.2
1972 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 7.5 15.5
1973 Ford Mustang 351ci 8.9 16.3
1974 Ford Mustang II 4sp 14.2 18.8
1974 Ford Mustang II Auto 15.6 19.4
1974 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 8.1 15.4
1975 Ford Mustang II (302ci V8 w/3spd) 9.6 17.5
1975 Chevrolet Camaro 350 11.0 17.4
1975 Chevrolet Camaro RS 8.5 16.8
1977 Ford Mustang II 302ci 11.3 17.7
1980 Ford Mustang (255ci) 11.8 18.5
1980 Ford Mustang Cobra (225ci) 11.3 18.4
1981 Ford Mustang M81 McLaren (2.3L Turbo) 9.7 17.3
1983 Chevrolet Camaro 9.5 17.5
1983 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 H.O. 6.7 15.0
1984 Ford Mustang SVO 7.9 15.8
1984 Chevrolet Camaro Berlinetta 9.3 17.0
1985 Ford Mustang GT 6.4 14.9
1985 Chevrolet Camaro Berlinetta 10.0 17.0
1985 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z28 7.0 15.2
1987 Ford Mustang GT 6.4 14.4
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z 6.6 14.9
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z L98 6.8 15.3
1988 Ford Mustang GT 6.4 15.0
1988 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z 7.0 15.5
1989 Ford Mustang GT 5.0l Manual 6.2 14.8
1990 Ford Mustang LX 5.0 6.4 14.9
1990 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z 5.8 14.4
1990 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 6.5 15.0
1991 Ford Mustang GT 7.3 15.6
1992 Ford Mustang LX 5.0 6.2 14.8
1992 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 6.7 15.2
1993 Ford Mustang Cobra 5.9 14.5
1993 Ford Mustang GT (auto) 8.0 16.1
1993 Chevrolet Camaro V-6 9.0 16.6
1993 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 5.8 14.4
1994 Ford Mustang Cobra 5.4 14.0
1994 Ford Mustang GT 6.1 14.9
1994 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 5.7 14.2
1994 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 Conv. 6.2 14.5
1995 Ford Mustang 3.8 9.9 17.3
1995 Ford Mustang Cobra R 5.2 13.8
1995 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 5.7 14.2
1995 Chevrolet Camaro 3800 7.4 15.7
1996 Ford Mustang Cobra 5.4 14.0
1996 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 5.7 14.1
1996 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 SS 5.3 13.8
1998 Ford Mustang Cobra SVT 5.4 14.0
1998 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 5.2 13.7
1998 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 SS 5.2 13.6
1999 Ford Mustang Cobra SVT 5.4 13.9
1999 Ford Mustang Convertible V6 8.6 16.5
1999 Ford Mustang GT 5.5 14.1
2001 Ford Mustang Cobra SVT 4.8 13.5
2001 Ford Mustang Bullitt GT 5.6 14.1
2001 Ford Mustang Roush Stage 3 4.3 12.9
2003 Ford Mustang Cobra SVT 4.5 12.9
2003 Ford Mustang Mach 1 (5 Speed) 4.7 13.2
2003 Ford Mustang Mach 1 (Auto) 5.6 13.88
2004 Ford Mustang Cobra SVT 4.5 12.9
2005 Ford Mustang GT V-6 6.9 15.3
2005 Ford Mustang GT 4.6L V8 5.1 13.5
2005 Ford Mustang GT Convertible 5.2 13.8
2007 Ford Mustang Shelby GT500 Convertible 4.5 12.9
2007 Ford Mustang Shelby GT-H 5.3 13.9
_____________________________
White 89' GT w/White Saleen rims
ATK308/B303/GT-40X 64cc
Cobra Intake/70 Cobra MA
70 BBK TB/#24 Injectors
Cobra Computer
MSD Ignition & Coil/9mm MS wires
MAC Shorties/Offroad H-Pipe
3:55's/FR HD Clutch
Nitto 555r's
|
|
|
|
|
RE: stock camaro vs stock mustang - 5/1/2007 10:51:58 PM
|
|
|
JD1969
Team MF Member #069
Posts: 8253
Joined: 5/21/2004
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: 07TungStang
we can try it out right now...i have the 2 enemies in the garage now a 2000 camaro 3.8 and a 2007 mustang 4.0....somebody can drive the maro while i drive the stang...
Nice job bringing back a post that's near 2 years old. Why do newbs always do this
_____________________________
GET IN THE RING!
|
|
|
|
|
RE: stock camaro vs stock mustang - 5/1/2007 10:56:39 PM
|
|
|
93WhiteStallion
Posts: 46
Joined: 1/10/2006
Status: offline
|
I thought everyone knew God built the LS1
|
|
|
|
|
RE: stock camaro vs stock mustang - 5/4/2007 10:36:41 PM
|
|
|
kenv
Posts: 1186
Joined: 12/17/2006
Status: offline
|
Ford started the whole " pony car " era with the introduction of the Mustang 1964 1/2 model. It took GM a couple of years to catch up (1967) with the introduction of the Camaro/Firebird. Ever since then, it been a seesaw horsepower battle between GM & Ford with the seesaw being tilted towards GM in the latest incarnation of the " F " bodies.
_____________________________
every day above ground is a good one
&
a bad day spent with my cars is better than a good day at work
00GT `vert
87 `Vette
|
|
|
|
|
RE: stock camaro vs stock mustang - 5/5/2007 3:28:24 AM
|
|
|
MustangMike2001
Posts: 1024
Joined: 9/1/2006
From: Nashville, TN
Status: offline
|
I don't see where anyone gets a 3.8 Camaro runs a 14.9.. Probably the same as when mm&ff ran that in a 3.8 Mustang. I was trying to decide between a Camaro and Mustang when I bought my car and the people I talked to on some Camaro forums said their 6ers were running 16's..
_____________________________
Turbonator, Nawwwzzz, Octane Boost, I'm too fast for ya'll mane
|
|
|
|
|
RE: stock camaro vs stock mustang - 11/22/2007 2:56:34 PM
|
|
|
KillSwitchNY
Posts: 305
Joined: 9/5/2005
Status: offline
|
ahhh, this situation is funny... been going on since when? 67?
anyway, like everyone said ford 5.0 does whip the GM 5.0 and 5.7 in the 80s. and damn i should know that.. had a 1988 5.7 TPI trans am, that car was **** for a 350. although my 96 Z28 had testicles.
and im not concerned about v6 performance.... is anyone for that matter?
my vote: 87-93 winner - mustang 5.0
94-02(death) Camaro Z28/SS
_____________________________
|
|
|
|
|
RE: stock camaro vs stock mustang - 11/22/2007 2:58:25 PM
|
|
|
KillSwitchNY
Posts: 305
Joined: 9/5/2005
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: 93WhiteStallion
I thought everyone knew God built the LS1
that motor is great. only one thing that urks me......it is NOT a 350
_____________________________
|
|
|
|
|
RE: stock camaro vs stock mustang - 11/22/2007 9:02:07 PM
|
|
|
OldSkool
Posts: 440
Joined: 5/11/2006
From: Raleigh, NC
Status: offline
|
just remember, even though the mustang has not always been as powerful as the cars with the late GM engines, the mustang has always blown away the competition in sales numbers...
making money is what it's all about, Ford FTW
_____________________________
|
|
|
|
|
Printable Version
