Mustang Forums   Mustang Classifieds   Photo Gallery   Calendars   Search   Live Chat   Contact MF   Sponsors
  Mustang Recalls   Mustang TSB's   News   Timeslips   Timeline   Wallpaper   Member List   Register   Login

RE: LS1

  Printable Version
Mustang Forum >> Speed Zone >> Street/Strip >> RE: LS1 Page: <<   < prev  5 6 [7] 8 9   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: LS1 - 4/7/2007 3:15:25 PM   
ThisBlood147


Posts: 3402
Joined: 1/19/2006
From: Louisiana
Status: offline
Not to diss the 3V GT's..........owning one myself.............but I still have a hard time with the 300hp GT being a driver's race for the 345-350ish hp LS1.  I never raced a stock one when I was stock, so I have no first hand experience.......it just seems weird.  I know a bad enough driver can handicap the hp advantage of his car pretty badly.....but damn.  Its not like there's a big weight difference (that I know of).

I do know that the new GT's put their power down pretty effectively even on stock suspension (or mildy modded suspension).....but they struggle once u start going FI.  Hence the reason I want to overhaul my suspension.  Car feels entirely too "squishy" now that I'm 160hp over stock.

I'm actually trying to find someone with a stock or mostly stock LS1 F-body to buddy up with so I can get a ride (or possibly a drive) in one.  I'm curious as to how different the powerband feels compared to my car.  So far, no luck.  I've met and talked to a few owners on chance meetings and such......but the only guys I know are the two dorks I work with, and they both have gone into the motor for mods......ie: not close to stock. 

_____________________________

98 Mustang V6: stock
93 Mustang vert: H/C/I 302 (SOLD)
05 GT: twin screw s/c + full suspension & tires


(in reply to TommyV8)
Post #: 121
RE: LS1 - 4/8/2007 7:59:02 PM   
lovescamaros25

 

Posts: 78
Joined: 3/3/2007
Status: offline
There is no question the LS1 is a better engine than the 4.6 IMO.

(in reply to TommyV8)
Post #: 122
RE: LS1 - 4/9/2007 10:12:26 PM   
ThisBlood147


Posts: 3402
Joined: 1/19/2006
From: Louisiana
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: lovescamaros25

There is no question the LS1 is a better engine than the 4.6 IMO.

Yay, your post count goes up by one...................here's a cookie.

_____________________________

98 Mustang V6: stock
93 Mustang vert: H/C/I 302 (SOLD)
05 GT: twin screw s/c + full suspension & tires


(in reply to lovescamaros25)
Post #: 123
RE: LS1 - 4/11/2007 4:35:30 PM   
TommyV8

 

Posts: 4026
Joined: 7/26/2004
From: St. Louis, MO
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: lovescamaros25

There is no question the LS1 is a better engine than the 4.6 IMO.

Which 4.6? Not the blown version, that's for sure.

_____________________________

2002 Camaro Z28
Automatic, stock converter, 2.73 gears
Airbox lid, longtube headers, catless Y-pipe, cutout, Nitto drag radials
12.72 @ 108.62 1.93 60 ft


(in reply to lovescamaros25)
Post #: 124
RE: LS1 - 4/11/2007 4:42:41 PM   
TommyV8

 

Posts: 4026
Joined: 7/26/2004
From: St. Louis, MO
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ThisBlood147

I'm actually trying to find someone with a stock or mostly stock LS1 F-body to buddy up with so I can get a ride (or possibly a drive) in one.  I'm curious as to how different the powerband feels compared to my car.  So far, no luck.  I've met and talked to a few owners on chance meetings and such......but the only guys I know are the two dorks I work with, and they both have gone into the motor for mods......ie: not close to stock. 

Mine is fairly close, I just have the lid and the headers. I can swap the lid for the stocker and keeping the cap on the cutout with the stock muffler pretty much negates the headers. Hell, I haven't even had it tuned for the headers so it might actually be slower than stock. But you live really far from me.

_____________________________

2002 Camaro Z28
Automatic, stock converter, 2.73 gears
Airbox lid, longtube headers, catless Y-pipe, cutout, Nitto drag radials
12.72 @ 108.62 1.93 60 ft


(in reply to ThisBlood147)
Post #: 125
RE: LS1 - 4/11/2007 11:28:15 PM   
ThisBlood147


Posts: 3402
Joined: 1/19/2006
From: Louisiana
Status: offline
Yea, I think your car would fit the bill nicely Tommy.  If only I had a good excuse (and the vacation time) to take a run up your way sometime.

P.S.  Get a tune on that thing man.  Poor Z

< Message edited by ThisBlood147 -- 4/11/2007 11:29:27 PM >


_____________________________

98 Mustang V6: stock
93 Mustang vert: H/C/I 302 (SOLD)
05 GT: twin screw s/c + full suspension & tires


(in reply to TommyV8)
Post #: 126
RE: LS1 - 5/8/2007 9:12:04 PM   
05MidBlueGT

 

Posts: 280
Joined: 12/15/2005
Status: offline
9 Year Old LS1 is still faster then current GT. We can, but numbers don't lie...

(in reply to ThisBlood147)
Post #: 127
RE: LS1 - 5/18/2007 7:39:15 PM   
stanger99

 

Posts: 319
Joined: 3/2/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: TommyV8

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovescamaros25

There is no question the LS1 is a better engine than the 4.6 IMO.

Which 4.6? Not the blown version, that's for sure.
  I have to argue yes the "blown4.6" is better for modding for crazy hp. But the engine itself is not better. Anybody can throw in some forged parts or what have you. Take the 01 cobra 32v and then compare it to the 01 SS LS1. If you start comparing the ls1 to the terminator you are speaking of  a topic that has been beat to death. A built LS1 vs a built 32v.... 281 vs 346 I don't about you but I know which one I am taking.

_____________________________

03' Terminator - shifter, bassani catback, intake and pulley


99 black gt vert:gone
06 GTO - Cammed/stalled, 408 rwhp... gone

(in reply to TommyV8)
Post #: 128
RE: LS1 - 6/8/2007 10:45:25 PM   
J E T


Posts: 89
Joined: 1/10/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: 05MidBlueGT

9 Year Old LS1 is still faster then current GT. We can, but numbers don't lie...


11 year old LS1.

_____________________________

Current:
1998 S10 4x4

Sold:
2000 Camaro Z28

Future projects:
1994/1995 5.0 Mustang M5 - H/C/I/E Supercharged
1996/1997 LT1 Camaro A4 - H/C/I/E Turbo
2001/2002 LS1 Firebird M6 - H/C/I/E Nitrous

(in reply to 05MidBlueGT)
Post #: 129
RE: LS1 - 6/14/2007 4:55:07 PM   
white07

 

Posts: 1274
Joined: 4/3/2007
Status: offline
white07's photo gallery
Im not going to make this seem like a big argument but come on 281 ci vs 346ci? How does a 347 stack up to a 346 b/c i know a guy who runs low 11s with a 347 and its a DD. As far as a semi stock 00 Trans Am vs. a stock 07 GT I got beat by about 2 cars length from a dig and a roll, but the problem was  I launched at 2K rpms which after going to the track I have found out that I gain at least .3 seconds by launching at 4K rpms so if I would of known that then it would have been a little closer eh? Also my buddy in his 03 cobra STOCK ran a SS with full exhaust, cam, gears, and I believe intake and heads and walked him hard.
When i went to the track a t/a with a cam was running 13.3s and a SS making a sh!t load of noise was running 12.8s.

All im saying is that the driver makes a BIG diffrence.


_____________________________


http://www.flickr.com/photos/28268683@N08/

(in reply to J E T)
Post #: 130
RE: LS1 - 6/15/2007 8:56:56 AM   
TommyV8

 

Posts: 4026
Joined: 7/26/2004
From: St. Louis, MO
Status: offline
If you have a heads and cam LS1 Camaro (or even just the cam) and you lose to a stock Cobra then you need to be put to sleep. A heads and cam LS1 should run at least low 11s; they can run 10s.

_____________________________

2002 Camaro Z28
Automatic, stock converter, 2.73 gears
Airbox lid, longtube headers, catless Y-pipe, cutout, Nitto drag radials
12.72 @ 108.62 1.93 60 ft


(in reply to ThisBlood147)
Post #: 131
RE: LS1 - 6/18/2007 2:23:51 AM   
stanger99

 

Posts: 319
Joined: 3/2/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: white07

Im not going to make this seem like a big argument but come on 281 ci vs 346ci? How does a 347 stack up to a 346 b/c i know a guy who runs low 11s with a 347 and its a DD. As far as a semi stock 00 Trans Am vs. a stock 07 GT I got beat by about 2 cars length from a dig and a roll, but the problem was  I launched at 2K rpms which after going to the track I have found out that I gain at least .3 seconds by launching at 4K rpms so if I would of known that then it would have been a little closer eh? Also my buddy in his 03 cobra STOCK ran a SS with full exhaust, cam, gears, and I believe intake and heads and walked him hard.
When i went to the track a t/a with a cam was running 13.3s and a SS making a sh!t load of noise was running 12.8s.

All im saying is that the driver makes a BIG diffrence.

Ok just so you know a SS with cam heads exhaust and intake is capable of 500 rwhp plus the gears that would be a good race for a cobra pullied with boltons and would flat out murder a stock 03/04. I was at the track fri. night and a guy was running a SS w/ headers, cam, and dr's he ran 11.9. And as far as your race goes it might have been closer but what if he didn't get a clean launch either eh? That 347 must be stroked, geared stalled or something to be running those numbers. with weight reduction.

_____________________________

03' Terminator - shifter, bassani catback, intake and pulley


99 black gt vert:gone
06 GTO - Cammed/stalled, 408 rwhp... gone

(in reply to white07)
Post #: 132
RE: LS1 - 6/18/2007 7:32:05 PM   
98LS1


Posts: 7043
Joined: 10/30/2003
Status: offline
98LS1's photo gallery
quote:

ORIGINAL: white07

Im not going to make this seem like a big argument but come on 281 ci vs 346ci?


How about how the 346 only has one cam?  Versus 4 in the DOHC Cobra's.  Only 2V per head?  Versus 4 in the Cobra's.

quote:

How does a 347 stack up to a 346 b/c i know a guy who runs low 11s with a 347 and its a DD.


Depends on the 347.  I know my car would have ran 11's with $1500 threw at it...most of that was in the drag radials.

quote:

 As far as a semi stock 00 Trans Am vs. a stock 07 GT I got beat by about 2 cars length from a dig and a roll, but the problem was  I launched at 2K rpms which after going to the track I have found out that I gain at least .3 seconds by launching at 4K rpms so if I would of known that then it would have been a little closer eh?


You can launch at 4k with a stock suspended GT and you actually hook?  Amazing.  And yes, it's pretty much a drivers race b/w the two cars, as mentioned.  The LS1 should win, but doesn't a lot of the times.

quote:

Also my buddy in his 03 cobra STOCK ran a SS with full exhaust, cam, gears, and I believe intake and heads and walked him hard.


Again, obviously a bad driver.  I had a buddy here recently in a bolt-on LS1 run 9.0's at the local 1/8th track and trap nearly 90mph.....in a bolt-on car.  I was mid 7's with the same trap speed.  Driver driver driver.

quote:

When i went to the track a t/a with a cam was running 13.3s and a SS making a sh!t load of noise was running 12.8s.


It takes a special person to run low 13's in a 400+rwhp car.  I usually see those times with a terminator or a Supra, when you'd expect so much more.

quote:

All im saying is that the driver makes a BIG diffrence.


Nail, meet hammer.

< Message edited by 98LS1 -- 6/18/2007 7:33:04 PM >


_____________________________

1998 TransAm

Idle/Walkaround

(in reply to white07)
Post #: 133
RE: LS1 - 6/18/2007 8:14:10 PM   
72MachOne99GT


Posts: 5568
Joined: 12/17/2004
From: Eskimo Village, Indiana *No Igloo*
Status: offline
72MachOne99GT's photo gallery
I have a non tech question for some of you more LS1 car savy guys...

what are low low milage LS1 cars going for now days???

my gfs brother is in love with WS6's ... and we ran across a black '02 with 9K miles....

it was an auto and they wanted I believe 26K... is that high?


_____________________________

Hopefully running by the weekend.
Gonna run her good too!

(in reply to 98LS1)
Post #: 134
RE: LS1 - 6/18/2007 8:57:01 PM   
JD1969




Team MF Member #069
Posts: 8569
Joined: 5/21/2004
Status: online
JD1969's photo gallery
That's pretty high and he would have a hard time getting a loan for it. A fair price would be around $20-21k. The reality is that there is no reason to pay extra for a low mile car. There is no collector value and there is no factory warrenty. Find one with 20-40k on it and pay $12-15k

_____________________________

GET IN THE RING!

(in reply to 72MachOne99GT)
Post #: 135
RE: LS1 - 6/18/2007 9:27:35 PM   
stanger99

 

Posts: 319
Joined: 3/2/2006
Status: offline
yea I would say thats pretty high.

_____________________________

03' Terminator - shifter, bassani catback, intake and pulley


99 black gt vert:gone
06 GTO - Cammed/stalled, 408 rwhp... gone

(in reply to JD1969)
Post #: 136
RE: LS1 - 6/18/2007 10:55:58 PM   
72MachOne99GT


Posts: 5568
Joined: 12/17/2004
From: Eskimo Village, Indiana *No Igloo*
Status: offline
72MachOne99GT's photo gallery
He's not looking to buy one, we were just out looking at cars and he started drooling and screaming "Thats what I want, that's it.. AH!!!"

I just said, eh, awfully nice, but not for me ;-)


_____________________________

Hopefully running by the weekend.
Gonna run her good too!

(in reply to stanger99)
Post #: 137
RE: LS1 - 6/18/2007 11:22:08 PM   
ThisBlood147


Posts: 3402
Joined: 1/19/2006
From: Louisiana
Status: offline
Uh, yea.........I'd say that 26K is pretty high for a car that is already 5 years old.  That wouldn't be too far away from what they were at MSRP brand new back in 02..........I think.  Of course, seems like there's been a rebound demand for the 00-02 F-bods, particularly the T/A's, in the last couple of years.  I'm guessing that's from lack of a continued production on GM's part.  High demand in a localized area can lead to high asking prices.  In late 06 I came across an 01 WS6 with 23K miles on it.............guy was asking 21K for it.  That might have been fine except for the crushed front nose. 

In some places its just a sellers market.

_____________________________

98 Mustang V6: stock
93 Mustang vert: H/C/I 302 (SOLD)
05 GT: twin screw s/c + full suspension & tires


(in reply to 72MachOne99GT)
Post #: 138
RE: LS1 - 6/27/2007 9:03:01 AM   
S8ER01Z


Posts: 2598
Joined: 9/12/2006
Status: online
And you're clueless. Not even worth the time to correct the BS you just posted.  *Sigh* mom still dress you in the morning?
Post #: 139
RE: LS1 - 6/28/2007 3:22:22 AM   
white07

 

Posts: 1274
Joined: 4/3/2007
Status: offline
white07's photo gallery


quote:

It takes a special person to run low 13's in a 400+rwhp car.  I usually see those times with a terminator or a Supra, when you'd expect so much more.
quote:



having 400rwhp and only running low 13s kind of ghey? you should be able to half ass it off the line and punch it in 2nd gear and still run a high 12.

Oh well what i really wanted to know to clarify in one of my post (firehawk=ownage) is what year did they make firehawks? They made them in the LT1 and LS1 cars right?




_____________________________


http://www.flickr.com/photos/28268683@N08/

(in reply to 98LS1)
Post #: 140
Login OR Register now to post a reply to this forum topic.
Page:   <<   < prev  5 6 [7] 8 9   next >   >>

 

 
Mustang >> Speed Zone >> Street/Strip
Jump to:
Forum Rules & FAQ
Today's Posts
Most Active Topics
RSS Feeds
Make A Donation

Mustangs:
Classic Mustang
Mustang II
Fox Body Mustang
sn95 Mustang
New Edge Mustang
s197 Mustang
Mustang Clubs
2007 GT500 Mustang
2009 Mustang
Ford Mustang Prices


Featured Sponsors
Advertising Info

Top 10 Posters
pro50sc17931
nanaki14689
88bluegt14536
dan04cobra14534
addermk214003
ride of the 13719
hotrods_n_bo13330
2000gt4.612516
mustangman0211994
1slo8511751

New Vendors
Extreme Dimension
BMR Fabrication
Year One
Auto Badges
Trickflow
Speedware Motorsports
LTM Global
Late Model Restoration
Southern Mustang Parts
BrandMotion

MustangForums.com is not affiliated with or endorsed by Ford Motor Company.