Ford Mustang Forums - Ford Mustang Classifieds - MustangForums.com Photo Galleries - MustangForums.com Chat Room - Create an Account - Mustang News

Go Back   MustangForums.com > Ford Mustang Tech > 6 Cyl (V6) Applications




Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-06-2006, 01:49 PM   #1
dbaisley
New Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location:
Posts: 38
Default perfromance for the v6 stang

im tired of seeing these stupid forum questions on "bs" this forum has got to be a performance one.
port the heads (increased cfm)
port the intake (increased cfm)
purchase a v6 comp cam l(iterally the brain of the engine)

these are just a few upgrades that will get your v6 pushing out some power. if you want real performance either do internals or forced induction. the internals i have listed have made a real big diffrence in my 98 stang
lets start putting real questions and upgrades on this forum and not dumb questions like" where should i put my 232 badges"
__________________


dbaisley is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
This ad is not displayed to registered members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
Old 03-06-2006, 01:53 PM   #2
jthorn9
CSMG Moderator
 
jthorn9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Slidell, Louisiana
Posts: 11,738
Default RE: perfromance for the v6 stang

Well people do this to 1.) raise their post counts, 2.) get our opinions on other things, 3.) not everybody can even come close to being able to afford even one of those mods, and 4.) this forum is more like a bar in a small town where everybody knows everybody else and we BS about whatever topic comes up, sometimes its a good one, sometimes its not, but point is, whatever the question may be, it's always a good question, so don't call post BS unless they really truely are BS, like a post about which chick has the bigger knockers, that's BS, but a post about where to put a badge isn't neccesarily BS, because that person wants advice, and this is an advice forum to, not just a performance forum.
__________________
00 Mustang V6
95 Mustang GT: 277 rwhp 360lbs rwtq

My Car Domain Page
My Mustang Site Page
jthorn9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2006, 01:57 PM   #3
traveler
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location:
Posts: 528
Default RE: perfromance for the v6 stang

Actually this is an upscale chat room. I agree. It needs to be real world questions and answers. We've tried to get people to post pictures of their upgrades/costs/reviews but it is more "IF" I do this (I'm really not going to) but IF I did who could I beat.
traveler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2006, 01:57 PM   #4
mustangman02232
6th Gear Member
 
mustangman02232's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Vehicle: 02 mustang v6 vert
Location: Ludlow, Mass
Posts: 12,563
Default RE: perfromance for the v6 stang


Quote:
ORIGINAL: jthorn9

Well people do this to 1.) raise their post counts, 2.) get our opinions on other things, 3.) not everybody can even come close to being able to afford even one of those mods, and 4.) this forum is more like a bar in a small town where everybody knows everybody else and we BS about whatever topic comes up, sometimes its a good one, sometimes its not, but point is, whatever the question may be, it's always a good question, so don't call post BS unless they really truely are BS, like a post about which chick has the bigger knockers, that's BS, but a post about where to put a badge isn't neccesarily BS, because that person wants advice, and this is an advice forum to, not just a performance forum.
thank you, we dont make just BS posts though, we just get into a discussion and shoot the sh*t about what comes up. and if you think were bad go check out the 05-06 section.
__________________
91 F-350 7.3 IDI/E40D 4x4 - DD/work truck
-8' fisher, dimond sander, flat bed w/boxes, 3/8" dimond plate rear bumper
-Banks trans command, 1900 stall, K&N

SOLD:
02 mustang vert, 3.8/4R70W
-K&N intake, exhaust with Long tubes
15.8 @89 mph 2.4 60'

Built/lifted 88 toyota pick up
bolt on 92 camaro 305 TBI

RIP tripsevn7
4/1/77 - 7/27/08
mustangman02232 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2006, 01:59 PM   #5
dbaisley
New Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location:
Posts: 38
Default RE: perfromance for the v6 stang

i agree, but in a world where we as 6 bangers get picked on by the v8s dumb questions and chats make us more subject to embarassment
__________________


dbaisley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2006, 02:02 PM   #6
mustangman02232
6th Gear Member
 
mustangman02232's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Vehicle: 02 mustang v6 vert
Location: Ludlow, Mass
Posts: 12,563
Default RE: perfromance for the v6 stang

there is only so many questions you can ask, if people were to actually use the search function then there would be no new topics
__________________
91 F-350 7.3 IDI/E40D 4x4 - DD/work truck
-8' fisher, dimond sander, flat bed w/boxes, 3/8" dimond plate rear bumper
-Banks trans command, 1900 stall, K&N

SOLD:
02 mustang vert, 3.8/4R70W
-K&N intake, exhaust with Long tubes
15.8 @89 mph 2.4 60'

Built/lifted 88 toyota pick up
bolt on 92 camaro 305 TBI

RIP tripsevn7
4/1/77 - 7/27/08
mustangman02232 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2006, 02:03 PM   #7
traveler
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location:
Posts: 528
Default RE: perfromance for the v6 stang

I know what you mean. You put in 90 percent and get back 10. It is just the nature of forums like this. You'll learn something..even if it is only how to BS better..
traveler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2006, 02:04 PM   #8
traveler
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location:
Posts: 528
Default RE: perfromance for the v6 stang

I bet you that within a week the same questions will be asked several times.
traveler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2006, 02:07 PM   #9
jthorn9
CSMG Moderator
 
jthorn9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Slidell, Louisiana
Posts: 11,738
Default RE: perfromance for the v6 stang

Yep, just look through the first 5 pages on the forum, there has to be at least 5 cai post, 3 4.2L or HO 3.8L post, and one or two pulley post, and that's a restrictive guess. Also, there are tons of GTers that post here, and since our last problem months ago, there really havn't been any V8 vs V6 fights, so that one is hardly an excuse.
__________________
00 Mustang V6
95 Mustang GT: 277 rwhp 360lbs rwtq

My Car Domain Page
My Mustang Site Page
jthorn9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2006, 02:10 PM   #10
mustangman02232
6th Gear Member
 
mustangman02232's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Vehicle: 02 mustang v6 vert
Location: Ludlow, Mass
Posts: 12,563
Default RE: perfromance for the v6 stang


Quote:
ORIGINAL: jthorn9

Yep, just look through the first 5 pages on the forum, there has to be at least 5 cai post, 3 4.2L or HO 3.8L post, and one or two pulley post, and that's a restrictive guess. Also, there are tons of GTers that post here, and since our last problem months ago, there really havn't been any V8 vs V6 fights, so that one is hardly an excuse.
this is the first ive seen of the 4.2 in a long time, but gears, CAI and exhaust are still asked 654654132 times a week
__________________
91 F-350 7.3 IDI/E40D 4x4 - DD/work truck
-8' fisher, dimond sander, flat bed w/boxes, 3/8" dimond plate rear bumper
-Banks trans command, 1900 stall, K&N

SOLD:
02 mustang vert, 3.8/4R70W
-K&N intake, exhaust with Long tubes
15.8 @89 mph 2.4 60'

Built/lifted 88 toyota pick up
bolt on 92 camaro 305 TBI

RIP tripsevn7
4/1/77 - 7/27/08
mustangman02232 is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors









New Sponsors


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:03 PM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.