Mustang Forums   Mustang Classifieds   Photo Gallery   Calendars   Search   Live Chat   Contact MF   Sponsors
  Mustang Recalls   Mustang TSB's   News   Timeslips   Timeline   Wallpaper   Member List   Register   Login

saleen or roush SC?

  Printable Version
Mustang >> Ford Mustang Tech >> Saleen, Roush and Boss Mustangs >> saleen or roush SC? Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
saleen or roush SC? - 2/20/2006 1:16:37 PM   
watevrpal

 

Posts: 15
Joined: 2/15/2006
Status: offline
i want to get a SC on my 06 gt. which SC should i get? my dealer suggests roush he suggests they are better and have been around longer. but i have read a few post's that state the opposite?
Post #: 1
RE: saleen or roush SC? - 2/20/2006 1:31:01 PM   
cableguymicah

 

Posts: 709
Joined: 2/2/2006
Status: offline
Well if you want low boost (which put less stress on your engine) go with Saleen. The best are kb,vortech and procharger. But beware your car may or maynot be able to handle to much boost of I have heard and know a guy who blew his engine with a procharger, he was putting 475rwhp when his broke.

_____________________________

06' saleen black on black #560
Upgrades 14'' brakes
VI Saleen supercharger
4.10 gears
more on the way!!

(in reply to watevrpal)
Post #: 2
RE: saleen or roush SC? - 2/20/2006 1:36:49 PM   
grabbem88


Posts: 8434
Joined: 12/31/2003
From: perryville,mo
Status: offline
longer how?..jack roush is older......steve saleen made his own s/c right?....
i think your dealer is retupid,cause neither is better to a point...the tune,and the set is what makes one better over the other.
quote:

ORIGINAL: watevrpal

i want to get a SC on my 06 gt. which SC should i get? my dealer suggests roush he suggests they are better and have been around longer. but i have read a few post's that state the opposite?



_____________________________

THOSE WHO BEG IN SILENCE....STARVE IN SILENCE
http://videos.streetfire.net/video/8EE10B2F-EDEA-4379-91A7-A89E4E27D4A9.htm

http://videos.streetfire.net/video/c535db52-4398-43c2-b538-9849013aa5e5.htm

(in reply to watevrpal)
Post #: 3
RE: saleen or roush SC? - 2/20/2006 1:46:59 PM   
watevrpal

 

Posts: 15
Joined: 2/15/2006
Status: offline
i am leaning towards a roush. thanks

(in reply to grabbem88)
Post #: 4
RE: saleen or roush SC? - 2/20/2006 1:50:36 PM   
grabbem88


Posts: 8434
Joined: 12/31/2003
From: perryville,mo
Status: offline
your money...call both companies see what they tell ya?

_____________________________

THOSE WHO BEG IN SILENCE....STARVE IN SILENCE
http://videos.streetfire.net/video/8EE10B2F-EDEA-4379-91A7-A89E4E27D4A9.htm

http://videos.streetfire.net/video/c535db52-4398-43c2-b538-9849013aa5e5.htm

(in reply to watevrpal)
Post #: 5
RE: saleen or roush SC? - 3/28/2006 9:16:16 AM   
04Mach1DD


Posts: 379
Joined: 3/14/2006
Status: offline
Roush racing has been around way longer and is more reliable. The prices are about the same for each supercharger. Roush warrenty is better, comes color coded to match you car. The saleen supercharger says it can "produce more then 400hp" doesnt say RWHP or how much it actually gives. Both are safe. I have over 125,000 miles on the companys car and everything runs fine. because roush is MADE IN AMERICA. Go with the roush, saleen has looks(sporty) but if your just getting a supercharger its roush all the way. Also consider gears. by the way if he did call both companys what do you think there going to say? o yea the other companys products are better? ill put up the newer test tommarow somtime if you want. this is what a roush does to a saleen. i would rather pay less and get more power, then to just pay for the name.(S7)
"When you drive a Roush you feel the difference. When you drive a Saleen you just think "This is a pretty car." "

HEAD TO HEAD

Roush Stage 3
Base Price: $37,500
As Tested: $48,975
Horsepower: 360 @ 5250 rpm
Torque: 375 @ 3000 rpm
Race weight*: 3650 lbs
Quarter-mile: 12.831 at 107.36
* With 160-lb. driver

Saleen S281 Supercharged
Base Price: $37,399
As Tested: $49,399
Horsepower: 365 @ 6000 rpm
Torque: 400 @ 3000 rpm
Race weight*: 3770 lbs.
Quarter-mile 12.951 at 105.96
* With 160-lb. driver


< Message edited by 04Mach1DD -- 3/28/2006 9:30:20 AM >


_____________________________

Work at ROUSH RACING,"winningest Ford racing company in history" 2004 Mach 1 KB Blower 17psi(10's)
2007 Roush Stage 3-Stock-Traded for-
2007 Roush 427

(in reply to watevrpal)
Post #: 6
RE: saleen or roush SC? - 3/28/2006 3:51:50 PM   
DProsser

 

Posts: 23
Joined: 3/22/2006
Status: offline
The Saleen supercharger puts out 435hp and 400lbs of torques it is a unique design that is built in house. In Irvine, CALIFORNIA. I apologize that we have not updated our website yet to show those figures.

Talk about reliability? "ROUSH Performance was established in 1995, with the development of a manifold package and tool kit introduced at that year's SEMA show" The first Saleen Vehicle and parts were available in 1984 from engine work, interior work, guages, body effects etc...

Both are safe. Im sure. Both are 5,699 msrp.
As far as the looks go of the supercharger that is personal preference of the consumer.

Feel free to check out pictures and info on the Saleen Supercharger.
Saleen Supercharger Info

If anyone lives in Southern California feel free to get in touch with me and i'll personally show you are facility and you can see where and how the cars and the super chargers are built.

As far as your "pretty car" comment ... Thanks for the compliment on the looks of our vehicles. There is actually more to them but thats a different story... Dont forget that Roush also does body modifications to their vehicles i would hope that your customers would think theyre roush vehicles were also "pretty" instead of just the Saleens.

Your Head to Head specs are reflected time differences by the respect of the difference of weight of the vehicles by 120lbs and driver abilities

_____________________________

Danny Prosser
Saleen Inc.

76 Fairbanks
Irvine, CA 92618
dprosser@saleen.com

(in reply to 04Mach1DD)
Post #: 7
RE: saleen or roush SC? - 3/28/2006 7:52:00 PM   
04Mach1DD


Posts: 379
Joined: 3/14/2006
Status: offline
hmmm sound like you just copyed that right from the roush website. So just how much HP does JUST THE SUPERCHARGER add? Exaltly? The Roush company has been around mid 70's. They didnt start MASS PRODUCING there parts untill late 94-95. Also tell me this, if Roush is at all unreliable then howcome Ford Dealerships sell only Roush performance products and not saleen? However i must say, the saleen is more clean then the Roush. He is looking for more HP and torqe

_____________________________

Work at ROUSH RACING,"winningest Ford racing company in history" 2004 Mach 1 KB Blower 17psi(10's)
2007 Roush Stage 3-Stock-Traded for-
2007 Roush 427

(in reply to DProsser)
Post #: 8
RE: saleen or roush SC? - 3/28/2006 8:45:00 PM   
DProsser

 

Posts: 23
Joined: 3/22/2006
Status: offline
I said nothing negative about Roush as far as reliability, you made a suggestions that reliability was based on how long the company had been around. And yes i did copy the excerpt from the Roush website. It says right it in plain writing when Roush Performance was established in 1995, i did not read the fine print about mass production, sorry.

The reason you can find Roush parts at Ford dealers is because Roush is considered a tuner.

While in comparison Saleen is small volume vehicle Manufacturer (built in not bolt-on) , each vehicle meets all governmnet regulations and is EPA certified. Each vehicle is uniquely designed and sold through selected delearships.

Be understanding of the fact that our aftermarket division sells parts to Saleen and Mustang enthusiasts. in the late 80's it was the company's decision to keep the parts department in-house. Brings better understading to "POWER IN THE HANDS OF A FEW".

In 1995 Saleen had sold cars to Ken Griffey Jr and George Forman both with Saleen designed vortech superchargers and built a total of 139 s351's and six SR models built to competition specs with 580hp, that were actually being raced around the country by Tim Allen, Bob Bondurant and Steve Saleen himself as a team.





_____________________________

Danny Prosser
Saleen Inc.

76 Fairbanks
Irvine, CA 92618
dprosser@saleen.com

(in reply to 04Mach1DD)
Post #: 9
RE: saleen or roush SC? - 3/31/2006 3:35:09 PM   
DProsser

 

Posts: 23
Joined: 3/22/2006
Status: offline
quote:

Although a stage III Roush and a S281sc are pretty similar, one area they are not is in the blower. Roush is still using a roots blower on their stage III setup. The roots blower they use needs to push more psi than the Saleen series 6 unit, which adds to the Roush's heat buildup and lack of efficiency vs. the Saleen series 6 blower. The diffence is considerable, enough that if I was undecided between the 2, I would default to the S281sc.
I'll be perfectly honest; not to flame on Roush, but their lack of a twin screw unit in their new cars shows that they are $ conscious and not performance consious. On top of that, the hp curve with the Roush blower is considerably flatter on top, compared to the Saleen's. Shame on Roush for using old, inefficient technology in the cars.(birdieman4)

(in reply to watevrpal)
Post #: 10
RE: saleen or roush SC? - 6/29/2006 12:02:32 PM   
GGIII


Posts: 869
Joined: 5/13/2005
From: Milledgeville, GA
Status: offline
Very true on the Twin Screw VS Roots-Type argument.

My vote is for the Saleen unit. It's got the tech.

Also a Saleen group buy is being advertised by one of MFs sponsors. Look at the top of the forum.

_____________________________


(in reply to DProsser)
Post #: 11
RE: saleen or roush SC? - 7/20/2006 11:55:25 PM   
skymedic

 

Posts: 183
Joined: 2/21/2006
Status: offline
Well,

I have a Roush Body, with a Saleen SC.

Here are some pics. I have the stock pulley, 39# injectors, and pulliing 395 RWHP, and 380TQ.

Saleen all the way.


Thumbnail Image



Thumbnail Image


Attachment (2)

_____________________________

2007 Shelby GT500
40th Anniversary Package / Supersnake Power / Brake / Short Shifter Upgrades!

(in reply to GGIII)
Post #: 12
RE: saleen or roush SC? - 7/20/2006 11:56:09 PM   
skymedic

 

Posts: 183
Joined: 2/21/2006
Status: offline
2 more pics.

JW


Thumbnail Image



Thumbnail Image


Attachment (2)

_____________________________

2007 Shelby GT500
40th Anniversary Package / Supersnake Power / Brake / Short Shifter Upgrades!

(in reply to skymedic)
Post #: 13
RE: saleen or roush SC? - 7/21/2006 8:25:23 AM   
4Stangs


Posts: 1452
Joined: 6/15/2006
Status: offline
4Stangs's photo gallery
Go with the Saleen supercharger. Better technology which = higher horsepower with lower boost. it's safe, reliable and much more efficient. And it's built in the USA with very good support from Saleen.

That's coming from a Roush fan not a Roush or Saleen employee.

_____________________________

65 GT convertible twilight turquoise
85 GT black/chromavision street legal 9s
92 LX dark blue
04 Mystichrome cobra
06 S281E screaming yellow

(in reply to 04Mach1DD)
Post #: 14
RE: saleen or roush SC? - 7/21/2006 8:59:31 AM   
S281 E

 

Posts: 2695
Joined: 3/30/2006
Status: offline
I would say Saleen as well. There new VI series supercharger is designed by Saleen themselves and built here in the states.

(in reply to 4Stangs)
Post #: 15
RE: saleen or roush SC? - 7/31/2006 11:15:01 AM   
4Stangs


Posts: 1452
Joined: 6/15/2006
Status: offline
4Stangs's photo gallery
skymedic, nice car. Those Foose wheels?

_____________________________

65 GT convertible twilight turquoise
85 GT black/chromavision street legal 9s
92 LX dark blue
04 Mystichrome cobra
06 S281E screaming yellow

(in reply to skymedic)
Post #: 16
RE: saleen or roush SC? - 8/25/2006 8:45:19 PM   
ThisBlood147


Posts: 3407
Joined: 1/19/2006
From: Louisiana
Status: offline
I say saleen s/c. I'll take a twin screw over a roots any day.

_____________________________

98 Mustang V6: stock
93 Mustang vert: H/C/I 302 (SOLD)
05 GT: twin screw s/c + full suspension & tires


(in reply to 4Stangs)
Post #: 17
RE: saleen or roush SC? - 9/13/2006 1:05:46 AM   
Arak Nafein

 

Posts: 108
Joined: 5/8/2005
Status: offline
Let's not forget. Roush is in good with Ford. Don't they develop some OE stuff? Either way, they worked with Ford on their supercharger. They didn't have to reinvent the wheel when it came to the computer aspect of their supercharger kit.

_____________________________

Freedom breeds isolation, that''s the lesson of human history! Equality creates nothing but the death of the individual!

(in reply to watevrpal)
Post #: 18
RE: saleen or roush SC? - 9/13/2006 8:48:54 AM   
S281 E

 

Posts: 2695
Joined: 3/30/2006
Status: offline
True but a well designed twin screw will always be more efficient than a well design roots.

(in reply to Arak Nafein)
Post #: 19
RE: saleen or roush SC? - 9/14/2006 11:26:34 AM   
RedFire281

 

Posts: 156
Joined: 9/3/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Arak Nafein

Let's not forget. Roush is in good with Ford. Don't they develop some OE stuff? Either way, they worked with Ford on their supercharger. They didn't have to reinvent the wheel when it came to the computer aspect of their supercharger kit.

Auto manufacturers have a vested interest in using roots type blowers - fewer moving parts which translate into more predictable reliability, which by extension means lower maintenance costs. Because roots blowers do not make internal compression they will never have the potential of twin screws or centrifugals. Roots blowers have the poorest adibiatic efficiency of the three types because of leakage blow back through the input shaft. The upside (besides maintenance and reliability costs) is that roots blowers make boost almost immediately and are at full boost often at 1800 to 2000 rpm. Roush, of course, will pick up the remainder of your 3/36 driveline warranty which is a big consideration for a lot of folks. So after all is said and done it seems to me to come right down to personal preference.

IMO, I'd love to have a Roush for the pros stated above but the group buy price for the Saleen is way too good to pass up so I've already contacted Haney Motorsports to put my name on the list. No reason to go into the pros of the twin screw because I think most people will agree that the current technology and potential for upgrading your car does not favor roots type blowers.

Just my .02

Thanks, John

(in reply to Arak Nafein)
Post #: 20
Login OR Register now to post a reply to this forum topic.
Page:   [1]

 

 
Mustang Forum >> Ford Mustang Tech >> Saleen, Roush and Boss Mustangs
Jump to:
Forum Rules & FAQ
Today's Posts
Most Active Topics
RSS Feeds
Make A Donation

Mustangs:
Classic Mustang
Mustang II
Fox Body Mustang
sn95 Mustang
New Edge Mustang
s197 Mustang
Mustang Clubs
2007 GT500 Mustang
2009 Mustang
Ford Mustang Prices


Featured Sponsors
Advertising Info

Top 10 Posters
pro50sc17992
nanaki14702
dan04cobra14540
88bluegt14536
addermk214188
ride of the 13794
hotrods_n_bo13347
2000gt4.612548
mustangman0212097
1slo8511868

New Vendors
Extreme Dimension
Year One
Auto Badges
Trickflow
Speedware Motorsports
LTM Global
Late Model Restoration
Southern Mustang Parts
BrandMotion
AMSOIL - Performance Oil Technology

MustangForums.com is not affiliated with or endorsed by Ford Motor Company.