The unofficial resource center for Mustang owners and enthusiasts
Ford Mustang Forums - Ford Mustang Classifieds - MustangForums.com Photo Galleries - MustangForums.com Chat Room - Create an Account - Mustang News


Go Back   MustangForums.com > General Mustang Forums > Mustang News, Concepts, Rumors & Discussion
Welcome to Mustang Forums!
Welcome to Mustang Forums.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


View Poll Results: Should the EcoBoost V6 come in the Mustang?
No-two engines are enough 4 4.12%
Yes-It should replace the V8 4 4.12%
Yes-Yes, it should be a mid level performance/economy model, but not called SVO. 33 34.02%
Yes-Midlevel performance, and It should be called the SVO. 33 34.02%
Yes-It should replace the current V6, so there is just the EcoBoost and the GT engine. 23 23.71%
Voters: 97. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-22-2008, 11:01 AM   #1
Demon 340
Administrator
 
Demon 340's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Vehicle: 1972 Dodge Demon 340
Location: yep
Posts: 15,380
Send a message via AIM to Demon 340
Default How about an EcoBoost Mustang?

See this front page article for an explanation behind this topic.

But the poll is simple..

Should Ford offer the 3.5TT DI, making 340hp in the Mustang, supposing that the 2010 GT has 400 horsepower? If so, should it be a mid level performance model, still offering the base V6?
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
Demon 340 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2008, 11:13 AM   #2
mustangfan410
3rd Gear Member
2008 Ford Mustang
 
mustangfan410's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Vehicle: 2008 V6 Pony Pkg.
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 674
Default

it would have to be a mid level mustang under the GT but above the v6.
__________________
mustangfan410 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2008, 11:29 AM   #3
bolivianpimp
4th Gear Member
2008 Ford Mustang
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,020
Default

I think it would be really cool since you would be able to mod for cheap since turbo's are already in place. Just like those ppl with subarus and neon's that can beat my v8 mustang.
bolivianpimp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2008, 11:56 AM   #4
tfyzorg2
2nd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Vehicle: 06 mustang v6
Location: Florida
Posts: 154
Default

twin turbo 300hp v6? SIGN ME THE HELL UP!
__________________
2006 mustang v6, black

4.10 gears
t-loc
underdrive pulley
steeda cai
mrt axleback
diablosport tuner
tfyzorg2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2008, 11:58 AM   #5
Elwood
2nd Gear Member
 
Elwood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Vehicle: 2007 Mustang GT
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 395
Default

midlevel, call it an SVO. The name would be recognizable amoung car enthusiasts and more could possibly sell. Unless they can come up with another cool name...
The Aussies do this engine arrangement with their Ford Falcons. They have N/A 6's for base models, Turbo 6's for moderate performance, and v8's for their high performance option. The 6 cylinder models used to be I6's but I believe they're going to start importing the ecoboost and duratec 35 (cyclone) engines soon. (Don't quote me on that though)
__________________
"Gus"-96 Dodge Caravan
-tape deck, squeaky steering wheel when cold

"Our Lady of Blessed Acceleration" -07 Vista Blue GT (Stored til spring)
-JBA Axle-Backs
Elwood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2008, 12:02 PM   #6
Demon 340
Administrator
 
Demon 340's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Vehicle: 1972 Dodge Demon 340
Location: yep
Posts: 15,380
Send a message via AIM to Demon 340
Default

I agree that the SVO name would get attention from the Mustang world more than something like GT-E...they have stuck with vintage names for the most part with the S197, but imagine if the Boss name came back with the Boss 302, and the Boss 35 could be the ecoboost package.
Demon 340 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2008, 12:36 PM   #7
Derf00
6th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location:
Posts: 6,838
Default

Keep it simple/stupid. Two engines is all they need (V6 ecoboost and V8). Give too many options (like 3 or 4 different engines) and you lose some of your market because the car will have too many competitors in various segments and people will start cross shopping with cars it's not supposed to compete with. (BMW, Camary (2dr), and things like Impalas and subies)
Derf00 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2008, 12:37 PM   #8
baddog671
5th Gear Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Vehicle: 1998 Ford Mustang
Location: Maryland- "The Fee State"
Posts: 4,076
Default

How about do that with another model, and leave the Stangs alone?
__________________
67coupe-351W-new modded suspension-front Granada disc-rear MarkVII disc-new manual steering-braced-31sp 3.25 lok 9" w/ 4pin-sound proofed- reloc. batt

98v6auto DD

"Wether you think you can or can't, you're probably right" -Henry Ford
baddog671 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2008, 12:45 PM   #9
Texotic
5th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Vehicle: 2005 Mustang GT
Location: College Station, TX
Posts: 2,161
Default

i say make the EcoBoost a midlevel performance model. the guys that want V8's will get GT's. the average buyer that is somewhat worried about fuel economy and isn't really getting the car for the performance aspect will get the V6. having this be a midlevel allows ford to put more go-fast goodies on it like a better suspension, heavier duty transmission, sport seats, etc. that will all appeal to the tuner crowd that is going to be the most interested in this car. each model targets a different audience and if you start cutting out models, you start cutting out market share. look at how many variants there are of the F150... it's been the top selling vehicle for over 30 years.
__________________
2005 Satin Silver GT Manual
Euromax 612's w/ Nitto NT555's
Tunable Induction/XCAL2/93 Tune
Steeda Rear Swaybar & G-Trac Brace
Corsa's
Sequentials
Waiting to be installed: BMR Adj. Street Combo LCA's
Texotic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2008, 01:00 PM   #10
GerRod
1st Gear Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Vehicle: 2008 Mustang Bullitt
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 85
Default

340 hp midlevel? I could be wrong but I don't think the V8s will be much over that if any. It'll be too close. Go with the 265/250 V6 that's in the Edge crossover and give us a 350 hp 5.0 L.
__________________
2008 BLK Bullitt #4020
GerRod is offline   Reply With Quote



Reply



Tags
2010, 2012, 612, cylinder, ecoboost, engine, euromax, ford, forum, mks, mustang, replace, v6, v8, wwwecoboost

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:33 PM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company