New Features: Ford Mustang Knowledge Base
The unofficial resource center for Mustang owners and enthusiasts
Ford Mustang Forums - Ford Mustang Classifieds - MustangForums.com Photo Galleries - MustangForums.com Chat Room - Create an Account - Mustang News


Go Back   MustangForums.com > Ford Mustang Tech > 4 Cylinder NA and Turbo > 4 Cylinder General Discussion
Welcome to Mustang Forums!
Welcome to Mustang Forums.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-25-2008, 04:18 PM   #1
big_game
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Vehicle: 1991 LX 2.3 Mustang
Location: WA
Posts: 3
Lightbulb My 1991 lx V4

I have a black, totally stock 1991 Lx V4 Auto transmission and I am looking to start working on it a little bit. I don't have a lot of money and would probably be more inclined to improve the looks of the car since I don't race. A cheap performance upgrade would be nice though.

I was thinking about maybe rims and a tint and a body kit but I don't have any idea to see how it would look with those

Thinkin about http://www.grounddynamics.com/Templa...ubFolderId=578 body kit

If anyone could make some suggestions for some less expensive upgrades for my mustang that would be awesome, or if you could post some pics of what you have done maybe I could get some ideas from that.

Edit: By the way, are there additional costs for painting/installing the body kit? I would probably need to paint the whole thing right? I doubt I could find paint made to look as old as mine lol
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!

Last edited by big_game; 11-25-2008 at 04:28 PM.
big_game is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2008, 05:53 PM   #2
WyldeSoul
1st Gear Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 118
Default

Welcome!

Well... I gotta say a couple things. First is just a nitpick. It's an I4, not a V4. "I" means inline, since they're all in a row, and not in a V pattern.

Second.. Going that much bodykitting on a car while keeping the drivetrain a stock slow, weak 4banger auto is just BEGGING to be called a Poser or a Domestic Rice.

Bodykits are very expensive to do right, as you have to get the paint just right, and often have to paint the whole car as well so that it matches. Anything else just looks like crap.

If you were wanting some good, less expensive ways to improve the looks, probably your best bet would be a really nice wax/polish, lowering springs, and a nice set of rims, something like GT Ponies or Cobra R's. (Yes, that would actually be cheaper than getting a bodykit done right).

With an all black mustang, you would probably get the best look improvement from just polishing and freshing up the paint, and tinting the windows. Smoked headlights might help, if you like that look. And that won't cost much at all. Just a lot of elbow grease to get the paint looking nice again.

But for the love of all that is holy, don't go for a cheap bodykit.
__________________
Good morning is an oxymoron.

Last edited by WyldeSoul; 11-25-2008 at 05:57 PM.
WyldeSoul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2008, 06:18 PM   #3
big_game
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Vehicle: 1991 LX 2.3 Mustang
Location: WA
Posts: 3
Default

Thanks for the input, after looking around more I found the body kit to be a bad idea after all. Probably going to go for some rims and tint, and are there any not expensive performance upgrades, some of my friends recommended a cold air intake, what do you think about that?
big_game is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2008, 06:40 PM   #4
WyldeSoul
1st Gear Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 118
Default

The only real way to get performance out of a 2.3 is to turbo it, or rather, swap in a turbo engine.

For a few more ponies, go to the boneyard and grab a 94-96 Ranger 2.3 "manifold". They came stock with headers, and it'll give you a bit more torque, and save a lot of weight. Doing a CAI won't help overly much, you're better off gutting your silencer and removing the snorkle. You'd also be better off getting a good muffler than a full cone filter intake.

But you're really not going to be getting much more than 110, 115 hp before you start to hit some really hard walls with the car, and have to spend lots of money.

On the other hand... If you find a 2.3 Turbo engine out of a Thunderbird, Cougar, SVO, or Merkur, grab the computer, the VAM, and the whole engine, and you're looking at usually 150 hp out of the box, with the simple, cheap potential to get to 200-250 with very, very little mods. It's a direct drop in on when you take the old block out. If you have an engine hoist, a few friends, and an open weekend, you can definately do that.
__________________
Good morning is an oxymoron.
WyldeSoul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2008, 10:48 PM   #5
924banger
4th Gear Member
1992 Ford Mustang
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Springfield, TN
Posts: 1,695
Default



Welcome

Do you have any pics of your car? A 4cyl T5 manual tranny would be something to look for when your auto goes out. They do on all of them(mine went and I had it rebuilt rather then look for a T5). Without spending a lot of money there really isn't much you can do to the n/a 4cyl other than what WyldeSoul stated.
__________________
Red 92 LX mustang 4cyl
1992 Bronco 5.8L
2003 Cavalier 2.2L Ecotec
1993 Lightning #1579...Died 12/21/06
924banger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2008, 05:18 AM   #6
86GT 93LX
5th Gear Member
 
86GT 93LX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,389
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 924banger View Post


Welcome

Do you have any pics of your car? A 4cyl T5 manual tranny would be something to look for when your auto goes out. They do on all of them(mine went and I had it rebuilt rather then look for a T5). Without spending a lot of money there really isn't much you can do to the n/a 4cyl other than what WyldeSoul stated.
that body kit was a bit much but this one on the same sight is kinda ok take a look
http://www.grounddynamics.com/Templa...bFolderId=1298
__________________
86gt maf,bbk underdrives,taurus 3g alt, contour dual e fan,crane cams ignition/coil,mac equal length shortys, off road h pipe, flows dumped. 5 lug and aluminum drive shaft next.
86 cherokee 6" lift 4.10s
89 cameo el
???
86GT 93LX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2008, 12:13 AM   #7
WyldeSoul
1st Gear Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 118
Default

Well, my personal opinion, that one's not that bad. Looks just like a slightly tweaked stock GT bodykit, and it's urethane, rather than cheap fiberglass. However, you'd once more run into the issue of the high cost of doing it right, and even if it does look beautiful, you'd better not let anyone know what's under the hood or they'll call you a poser, but especially if it looks shoddy and the paint's mis-matched or faded or something.

Once more, my opinion is you'd be far better off getting the black paint to look beautiful, lowering it just a little, and getting some nice rims to compliment the look. To me, at least, rarely, rarely does a bodykit look good. I much prefer clean and shiny stock body, with some tasteful 5 spoke rims, and an inch or two drop.

I guess I just really like the LX bodystyle, even over the GT.
__________________
Good morning is an oxymoron.

Last edited by WyldeSoul; 12-03-2008 at 12:17 AM.
WyldeSoul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2008, 01:57 AM   #8
924banger
4th Gear Member
1992 Ford Mustang
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Springfield, TN
Posts: 1,695
Default

If the body pieces are broken then replace them or go with a body kit, but otherwise I would spend that money on cleaning the car up and replacing items that are worn out or broken(like suspension, seats, ect).
Personally I would fix any mechanical problems(or just start stashing money away for a 4cyl turbo motor), clean it up(as in deep clean the interior, engine bay, and paint), then go for suspension replacement/modification, and then on to interior restoration/modding.
__________________
Red 92 LX mustang 4cyl
1992 Bronco 5.8L
2003 Cavalier 2.2L Ecotec
1993 Lightning #1579...Died 12/21/06
924banger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2008, 08:55 PM   #9
al_ngl
4th Gear Member
1993 Ford Mustang
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Vehicle: 1993 Mustang LX 2.3
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 1,014
Send a message via Yahoo to al_ngl
Default

I chuckled at "V4". I almost thought you had done a Volvo head swap (four valves per cylinder). Sorry, not trying to be mean.

I agree with 924banger. Make the car a good daily driver, and then start modding it. There's no point having a car that looks nice to you if it's annoying or unreliable to drive. It really doesn't take much to get these 2.3s up to spec with how they came, but typically they all have problems from the time you buy them (at least everyone on this forum seems to have car problems). How long have you had the car, and what has been done to it as far as repairs and maintenance since owning it?
__________________
"The battery is discharging, the oil temperature is very high, the oil pressure is very low, the engine temperature is off the end of the scale, I'm running out of petrol, but the clock is correct!"- James May
al_ngl is offline   Reply With Quote



Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:34 PM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company